A great rahasya in MB - droNa, upon death attained mukti.
Due to grief over his son, he felt helpless to even continue living – “Akinchanyam”. He had only one goal – bhagavAn, for freedom from misery. This is “ananyagativam”.
Thus, he performed sharaNAgati+
सन्न्यासाय शरीरस्य योक्ष्यमाणः स वै द्विजः'। सर्वाण्यस्त्राणि धर्मात्मा हातुकामोऽभ्यभापत
[That noble minded dvija, intending to join with the self (in meditation) for the sake of surrender & desirous of casting aside all his weapons…]+
“सन्न्यासाय” – nyAsa vidyA or surrender. “शरीरस्य” – jIvAtma, which is the body of Brahman & subservient to him, the self. ShvetAshvatAra Up. also calls the jIva “देहम्”.
DroNa wished to meditate on the self as a शरीर of Brahman, reflecting on it’s subservience for surrender+
उत्सृज्य च रणे शस्त्रं रथोपस्थे निविश्य च । अभयं सर्वभूतानां प्रददौ योगयुक्तवान्
[He cast aside his weapons & sat down on his chariot. He, united with Brahman, the highest means (योगयुक्तवान्), gave fearlessness to his senses]
[Drona leaving his weapons, was abiding in highest knowledge of the self. Having said “namaH”, taking recourse to Brahman, the Supreme Means, he of high knowledge became resplendent]+
“साङ्ख्यमास्थितः ” – “साङ्ख्यम्” is the highest knowledge concerning the self. What is this knowledge? That the self, by nature, is subservient to bhagavAn and belongs to him.
droNa meditated on shesha-sheshi bhAva, saying “namaH”+
पुराणं पुरुषं विष्णुं जगाम मनसा परम् ।
[He went by mind, to VishNu, the Purusha, who has an ancient form that appears ever new (upon experience).]
By his grief, droNa extinguished his pApa. By his bliss on seeing bhagavAn’s form in his mind, he extinguished his puNya+
[His face bent down, with chest forward, closing his eyes, situated in sattva (without ego), he entrusted himself to contemplation on Brahman in the mind.]
[Remembering the Ruler of brahmA, that god whose greatness never diminishes, the Supreme Master – AchArya (droNa) verily obtained the Supreme Abode, difficult to attain for even the gods]+
[Breaking open the skull via the suShumNa nADi, that noble-minded one became resplendent with the light of the self. He went to that Supreme Abode, Vaikuntha, leaving his body in the chariot]+
Only a select few saw his mukti, hence it was a rahasya:
[Dhrishtadyumna was bewildered when droNa ascended to brahma loka (paramapada).
We five alone among men saw droNa, yoked to bhagavAn, the supreme means, proceed to the highest state - Myself (Sanjaya), Arjuna, kR^ipAchArya, vAsudeva and yudhiShThira. None else could see that]+
Sanjaya could see droNa’s mukti by vyAsa’s anugraha. The others saw him by anugraha of vAsudeva. dhR^iShTadyumna, would-be killer of droNa, never saw it.
अन्ये तु सर्वे नापश्यन्भारद्वाजस्य धीमतः । महिमानं महाराज योगयुक्तस्य गच्छतः । ब्रह्मलोकं महद्दिव्यं देवगुह्यं हि तत्परम्+
[All others did not see that wise bhAradvAja, his glory, as he united with bhagavAn as the means, proceeded to that highly respendent brahma loka, a secret known only to nitya sUrIs, that Supreme Abode from which there is no return]
[AchArya, situated in Brahman, the supreme means, obtained brahma loka, while his body was pierced with arrows, bleeding, having relinquished his weapons]+
sharaNAgati can be done at anytime, anywhere, by anyone.
droNa performed it in midst of battle. He was a brAhmaNa, yet he was fighting – which was adharma.
He was fighting for the Kauravas – again, adharma. Yet, he attained the supreme abode by self-surrender+
A few clarifications - Why didn’t droNa perform sharaNAgati to ensure his was son alive, instead of mukti?
Because he was weary of samsAra itself. He knew that even if his son was alive, grief would assail him again due to such attachments – so he wanted to leave samsAra+
dhR^iShTadyumna cut off the head of a lifeless body. But agni purANa says “धृष्टद्युम्नशराक्रान्तः पतितः” – droNa fell by dhR^iShTadyumna’s arrows. Why?
dhR^iShTadyumna defiled a prapanna’s body, dear to bhagavAn, incurred the latter’s wrath, & was killed through ashvattAma+
Finally, svargArohanika parva says droNa entered brihaspati upon death. YudhiShThira sees droNa with brihaspati. If he had attained moksha, how is this possible?
A mukta has free movement in all worlds – so saying droNa attained brihaspati’s world is true & preserves a rahasya+
Also, mukta assumes infinite forms. The mukta who was formerly droNa appeared in a similar form near brihaspati for dharmaputra’s sake, by bhagavad anugraha.
Normally, muktAs are not seen by samsArIs, so this was a special favor of bhagavAn to yudhiShThira.//
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Salutations to the Supreme Brahman whose nature is incomparable & is not manifest in his avatArAs, who is free of blemishes & full of kalyaNa guNas, whose form is the support of the whole Universe]+
“अचिन्त्याव्यक्त रूपाय” – His divine nature which is incomparable & not manifest to anyone even in his avatArAs. “रूप” means nature here. Only the liberated can see this nature.
“निर्गुणाय गुणात्मने” – One who has no blemishes of triguNAs, & is full of auspicious attributes+
The final battle between duryodhana and bhIma is more fascinating if you understand that it is the battle between the body (duryodhana) and upAsana (bhIma).
Every move of duryodhana & bhIma is worth several janmas of movement in samsAra. That is why vyAsa describes it in detail+
Each time Duryodhana jumps up and strikes bhIma while coming down, it is the body taking the upAsaka to svarga & upper worlds. Then the blow - bringing the upAsaka down when fruits are exhausted.
When Duryodhana jumps crookedly or sideways, it is transmigration to lower worlds+
When bhIma strikes duryodhana, bhakti has an upper hand in controlling the body. The blood on bhIma's face which he keeps wiping off is rajo-guNa caused by the body.
Reading the fight in this manner, as a back-and-forth battle of yogI vs samsAra is fascinating+
[Keshava, intelligent in protecting his bhaktas & devoted to their welfare, told Arjuna, “droNa, that foremost of bowmen, cannot be defeated by direct conflict in battle, even by gods with Indra. He is capable of being killed even by humans, when he lays down his weapons”]+
Just a small clarification - the purpose of the Veda is to describe the nature, form, qualities and vibhUtIs of the Supreme Brahman.
So, the style of the samhita is that a sUkta will choose a particular guNa of Brahman and start elaborating on it+
During the course of this, the Veda may highlight an avatAra or deed of bhagavAn described in shAstra, as an example of the guNa it is describing.
It is in this vein that the Veda occasionally makes references to incidents in ithihAsa+
In the example I gave, the guNa that the Veda was describing was soulabhya or accessibility, conducive for sharaNAgati. Thus, it highlighted rAma who embodies that guNa+
So, nobody is rushing to misinterpret sUktAs to say, "hey look this sUkta is about rAma wowee so cool!!1!1! +
अहश्च कर्ष्णमहरर्जुनं च वि वर्तेते रजसी वेद्याभिः
[pApa and puNya which illumine all experiences are terrible and pure respectively; these two impurities move away by the contempations of Brahman.]+