WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was granted permission by the British High Court of Justice to appeal to the Supreme Court
In court to cover the proceedings, @MElMaazi reported that the High Court certified the issue of diplomatic assurances was important enough to allow Assange an appeal to the Supreme Court
Assange will remain in Belmarsh prison throughout the duration of this appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
Courts and Tribunal Service in the UK, which had done fairly well granting international journalists access to follow Assange proceedings, utterly failed.
Video links issued finally at about time High Court announced decision. Then video had issues when opened so most missed.
British High Court opens door for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to appeal their prior decision to the Supreme Court thedissenter.org/british-high-c…
If you'd like to stay updated on the latest developments in WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's appeal before the Supreme Court, I encourage you to subscribe to The Dissenter Newsletter.
“What happened in court today is precisely what we wanted to happen,” declared @StellaMoris1. “High Court certified that we had raised point of law of general public importance, and that Supreme Court has good grounds to hear this appeal." #Assange
@StellaMoris1 "The situation now is that Supreme Court has to decide whether to hear the appeal. But make no mistake, we won today in court," @StellaMoris1 added.
Without certification, extradition request could've been sent to Home Secretary Priti Patel. That was prevented—for now. #Assange
@StellaMoris1 At 12pm ET, I'll join @RightsDissent policy director @ChipGibbons89 for a discussion on the UK High Court decision that opened the door for Julian Assange to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.
Tune in:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Martin Luther King Jr.'s analysis of "consensus presidents" applies considerably to Joe Biden.
Biden is a technician, not an innovator. His admin works only for what is widely acceptable, which there isn't much consensus on anything. shadowproof.com/2016/01/18/mar…#MLKDay
Biden delays action constantly. His administration abandons promises and doesn't fight for policy.
MLK Jr. would likely say Biden lacks mass movement that will force him to act and give him an achievement to define his presidency as more than an exercise in mediocrity. #MLKDay
To Martin Luther King Jr., "The overwhelming national consensus followed" the acts of the most lauded US Presidents. "It did not precede them." That was owed to grassroots social movements (i.e. Civil Rights Movement). #MLKDay
I spent several hours in December watching "Bob Saget's Here For You" when I needed a break. One evening, I was drawn into Bob Saget's charm as he called fans. He was so warm and kind. I watched over an hour of Bob joking & talking with them about life in our pandemic normal.
Then there was this episode of Bob Saget's podcast with one of his best friends, Gilbert Gottfried. In between stories, Bob and Gilbert kept going back to this unusual problem Gilbert has with birds and damn, it's funny.
And thanks to Bob Saget's show I heard George Lopez tell story of the Secret Service coming to his house while Donald Trump was president after he tweeted, "We'll do it for half"—a response to a report of an Iranian legislator putting out a bounty against Trump. #RipBobSaget
CPJ (@pressfreedom) is deeply concerned about Assange's extradition but not enough to defy US government's decade-plus campaign to redefine Assange as someone who is not a journalist—which officials have done to justify the criminalization of his journalistic work.
CPJ may dislike pushback they're receiving for excluding Julian Assange from annual journalists index. That's why they posted this thread on December 21. But CPJ is increasingly an outlier.
The European Federation of Journalists recognizes Assange as a jailed journalist.
For more background, including their inadequate response to my question about why Assange remains excluded from CPJ's jailed journalists index: thedissenter.org/cpj-still-excl…
British High Court of Justice will announce their ruling on the US government's effort to overturn a district judge's decision, which blocked the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. I'm covering.
Thread for following proceedings at the High Court.
If you are not familiar with the grounds of appeal in the Julian Assange case submitted by the US government, which the High Court will rule for or against today, here is the guide I assembled outlining each aspect:
Programming Note: I've reported on every stage of the case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange pursued by the US government. thedissenter.org/tag/julian-ass…
Reality Winner didn’t commit espionage. She was found guilty of violating the Espionage Act. That’s an important distinction that responsible broadcast journalists should make for viewers. #60Minutes
Rather condescending opening as #60Minutes dwells on her name and says that may not be the most baffling aspect of her story
At the British High Court of Justice, Julian Assange's defense present their response(s) to the United States government's effort to overturn a district court decision, which blocked extradition.
Thread for updates on the second day of the appeal hearing.
To recap: On Day 1, Crown prosecutors, led by James Lewis QC, attacked the work done by District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, who weighed facts to determine if it would be "oppressive" to Assange's mental health to grant US government's extradition request.