Madima Profile picture
Jan 24 24 tweets 9 min read
Foreign Direct Investment flows to South Africa increased to $41 billion in 2021 from $3 billion in 2020 largely driven by the share swap between Naspers and ita majority-owned subsidiary Prosus.

Who is Prosus and why did Naspers embark on the share swap?

[Thread]
When Naspers coughs, the entire JSE catches a cold.

The JSE had record trading volumes on 17 Aug 2021 and of the R148bn traded, Naspers and Prosus accounted for R125bn in value.

Naspers’s size on the JSE was 25.9% the JSE Shareholder Weighted Index in 2019 and 23.3% in 2021.
In 2019, Naspers decided to unbundle all of its internet interests outside of South Africa including the famous Tencent stake into a new company which was called Prosus.

Prosus got a primary listing on Euronext Amsterdam and a secondary listing on the JSE.

Naspers held 73.2%.
Prosus is a top 12 global consumer internet company.

Before the creation of Prosus, Naspers's size on the JSE was 25.9% of the JSE Shareholder Weighted Index (SWIX) which had become untenable.

Post listing it ⬇️ to 18.4%
of the SWIX but ⬆️ to 23.3% as at Apr 2021.
Valuation of Tencent created a serious headache for Naspers.

Naspers sought to fight the gap between its market value and the sum of its parts (Naspers' shares trade at a substantial discount to the value of its underlying investments).

Listing of Prosus didn't help.
Trading at a discount to the sum-of-the-parts is common for holding companies

When entity trades at discount to NAV,it means if investors were to hold individual positions in entity's underlying assets,they would be worth more than holding shares in parent that owns those assets
What 'complicates' things with holding companies that have unlisted investments is the difficulty in valuing those unlisted investments (lack of proper disclosure).

Valuing listed investments within holding companies (Remgro) is often easier than valuing unlisted investments.
There is a clear correlation between Naspers’s increasing size on the JSE and the growth in the discount.

Prior to Prosus listing, Naspers traded at a discount to NAV of 35%-40%, and has averaged 50% post listing.

Prosus trades at an average discount to NAV of just below 34%.
Naspers’s 2001 acquisition of a 46.5% stake in Tencent for a mere lousy $32m is the greatest investment by a SA company and is valued at $221bn.

H1 2021, Prosus sold 2% of Tencent and generated proceeds of $14.6bn.

Prosus ⬇️ to 28.9% and won't sell again in the next 3 years.
Market participants have previously suggested that in order for Naspers to close the gap, it should unbundle Prosus’s stake in Tencent to its shareholders, but Naspers has previously cited both strategy and potential huge tax bills as reasons why an unbundling won't work.
So what did Naspers and Prosus do?

A complex financial engineering took place in 2021.

Prosus decided that it will acquire 45.33% of Naspers N Shares of Naspers which owned 73.2% of Prosus in exchange for its own shares.

Prosus would get a 49.5% economic interest in Naspers.
Prosus acquired 45.4% (197.5 million) of the issued Naspers N ordinary shares and Prosus issued, 449.3 million new Prosus ordinary shares N to tendering Naspers N shareholders.

This increased the number of issued Prosus ordinary shares N to 2,062 million
How was Naspers’ shareholding of Prosus affected by the transaction?

Naspers’ stake in Prosus decreased to 57.2% of issued Prosus N Shares
down from 73.2%.

A Cross-Holding Structure was created.
Naspers owned 73.2% of Prosus with a 26.8% free float (a financial measure that represents the % of shares of a listed company that can be freely traded).

Post the complex deal, Prosus free float ⬆️ to 42.8% ($100bn) due to Naspers only owning 57.2% of Prosus.
What are the consequences of a free float?

A higher free float often means that the share will become more liquid allowing more investors to buy it.

Prosus now owns 49.5% of Naspers reducing its free float (giving Naspers' holders less access to returns generated from Tencent).
The proposed transaction was expected to generate between R3.8bn and R5.8bn of tax revenues for South Africa.

Prosus spent R2.1bn ($144m) in transaction fees to get this transaction over the line.
In FY20 Naspers contributed an estimated R10.2bn in direct and indirect taxes to South African public finances, including an estimated amount of R7.2bn which related to the listing of Prosus in September 2019.
Prosus is very big on Edtech.

Prosus has invested over $3bn in 9 companies in the Edtech space.

It is often said that education is an area of massive consumer spend which is expected to reach $10trn by 2030 that remains largely untouched by technology.
In 2015, Naspers through its Naspers Ventures made a strategic investment of ~$60m in Udemy and has since invested +/-$121m in Udemy.

Prosus holds a ~13.98% stake in Udemy.
Prosus’s latest acquisitions/investments in Edtech:

Stack Overflow for $1.8bn (community and Q&A platform for developers).

62% of GoodHabitz for $259m, (online corporate training leaders)

$500m investment in Skillsoft (corporate digital learning company in the US).
South Africa’s direct investment liability inflows increased from R17.4 billion in Q2 of 2021 to R557.9 billion in Q3, as among others, Prosus N.V
acquiring 49.5% of Naspers Ltd from the existing Naspers Ltd shareholders.
Portfolio investment liabilities ⬆️ from an outflow of R0.1bn in Q2 of 2021 to an outflow of R370.9bn in Q3.

Net sales of equities of R362bn in Q3 of 2021 can, among others, be attributed to non-resident investors exchanging shares held in Naspers Ltd for Prosus N.V. shares.
When Naspers and Prosus take a beating due to the regulations that affect Tencent, market participants specifically portfolio managers in South Africa quote "ebhen phoyeth" Malusi Gigaba when addressing the issues affecting the decline in the share prices.
36 asset managers and investors (who collectively represent total assets under their management of more than R3.6trn) wrote an open letter to the boards of Naspers and Prosus not to go the route of the share exchange between the two companies.

Naspers and Prosus:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Madima

Madima Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaanoMadima

Jan 18
GSK Consumer Healthcare has rejected a bid from Unilever to acquire its consumer health joint venture with Pfizer for a total acquisition value of £50bn comprising £41.7bn in cash and £8.3bn in Unilever shares.

Pfizer owns 32% of the joint venture while GSK owns remaining 68%.
GSK had received 3 unsolicited, conditional and non-binding proposals from Unilever plc to acquire the GSK Consumer Healthcare business.

GSK rejected all 3 proposals made on the basis that they fundamentally undervalued the Consumer Healthcare business and its future prospects.
What is a competitive offer for the GSK/Pfizer?

It would be based on a multiple to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) in the high teens, potential synergies of 14 to 15 per cent and a premium of at least 25%,
Read 5 tweets
Jan 18
Quick one on where the battle between Peter Moyo and Old Mutual emanates from.

Sango Ntsaluba, Thabiso Tlelai and Peter Moyo co-founded NMT Capital. Old Mutual Life Assurance owned 20% of NMT Capital.

Moyo was the CEO of Old Mutual and non-executive director of NMT Capital.
Jul 2018, Peter Moyo is alleged to have participated in a meeting of the NMT Capital board at which it was decided to pay an ordinary dividend of R105m.

Co-founders shared R84m, while omitting to pay preference share dividends, valued at R65.4m at the time, due to Old Mutual.
Why was the dividend declaration an issue?

Old Mutual stated that declared was in contravention of the preference share subscription agreement between NMT Capital and Old Mutual that prescribed that preference share debt is to be settled before ordinary dividends can be declared
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
Banks and private equity firms have seen the amount of money sports has and want to benefit.

1) Citi appointed as the sole global coordinator bank to set up UEFAs European Club Football Recovery Plan €2bn programme.

2) CVC Capital Partners invested €2bn in La Liga.

[Thread]
1) Citigroup beat Goldman Sachs and Macquarie and private equity firm Apollo to be as appointed as the sole global coordinator bank to set up UEFAs European Club Football Recovery Plan €2bn programme.
The financing programme aims to provide teams with liquidity aimd the effects of Covid-19.

European Club Football Recovery Plan which seeks to use UEFA club competition revenues as security.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 15
Massmart intends to sell 15 of its 114 Game stores due to the damage caused by the July 2021 unrest.

The July protests, like Covid-19 are often used as a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Game has been on the ropes for a while now.

Massmart impaired Game by R570m. Image
Walmart paid ~R16.5bn (R148/share) for a controlling stake (51%)in Massmart in 2011.

The 51% is now valued at ~R6.5bn.

Massmart is at ~R57/share.

Things have went bad for Massmart in the last 10 years and Game stores were not spared. Image
To arrest the downward spiral, Massmart came up with a Turnaround Plan.

This plan included the closure of DionWired stores and the divested from underperforming Masscash stores.

Massmart closed 23 DionWired stores. Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 10
Dragan Šolak from Serbia has purchased 80% of Southampton FC for £100m from Gao Jisheng with Katharina Liebherr retaining the remaining 20%.

The transaction gives Southampton FC an enterprise value of +-£230m including debt.

Who owns some of the EPL and PSL teams? 🧵
Gao Jisheng paid £210m for 80% of Southampton in 2017.

Gao hasn't invested any money into the club as he wants the club to be self sufficient (“I am not treating Southampton as a pig to be fattened and sold".

Club has generated £63m from operations and £62m from external loans.
To weather the Covid-19 storm, Southampton got access to a very expensive term loan of £78.8m provided by MSD Partners (football lender) which replaced a working capital facility.

End result was a cash balance of £40m with gross debt rising from £31.8m to £91.3m.
Read 23 tweets
Dec 11, 2021
Mergers & Acquisitions, corporate actions, prominent executive movements that I followed in 2021. 🧵

1) Mr Price bought Power Fashion for between 3% (R1.5bn) and 4% (R2bn) of Mr Price’s R50.7bn market cap.

2) Mr Price bought Yuppiechef for 1% of Mr Price's R47bn market cap.
3) Sipho Maseko stepped down as Telkom Group’s CEO.

4) Cashbuild had proposed to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of The Building Company (TBC) for R1,074,700,000. In May, the Commission recommended that the proposed transaction be prohibited.
5) Equities Properties and the Eskom Pension & Provident Fund agreed to form a joint venture that will buy the DSV Campus from DSV Real Estate for R2.05bn and lease it back to DSV for an initial annual rent of R157.5m.

6) Comair entered into voluntary business rescue.
Read 110 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(