There’s plenty of anti-Asian bias in elite universities (just ask Amy Wax). But gutting affirmative action for other discriminated against groups is not the answer.
Affirmative Action: Supreme Court to consider landmark challenge to Harvard and UNC cnn.com/2022/01/24/pol…
Anti-Asian bias in academia is real. Instead of gutting affirmative action for other discriminated against minorities, elite universities that receive federal funds should be required to end admissions preferences for faculty children and rich alumni.
A university that solicits applications (and application fees) and has an undisclosed admissions preference for children of faculty and rich alumni is defrauding other applicants. That's what DOJ and state AG's need to look into, not fully disclosed affirmative action programs.
Elite university faculty in particular lobby in their kids and sometimes grandkids. Subpoenas would uncover the emails and other communications. This should be the focus rather than attacking affirmative action for discriminated against minorities.
If the Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action in private universities without dealing with the faculty brat problem and rich alumni who lobby their kids in, we might was well just call the universities restricted country clubs (which they already are for most part anyway).
If you are a White applicant denied admission to an elite university this Spring, it's far more likely that your spot was taken by a White faculty brat, alumni kid, or friend of faculty/administrators than by an African American or Hispanic applicant. Let's get real about this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This terribly mishandled harassment case at MSU has now resulted in a lawsuit. Both MSU and Minnesota’s Board of Regents need to investigate.
Rachel Croson’s involvement in employee conduct case at MSU prompts discussion – The Minnesota Daily mndaily.com/236167/news/ad…
A separate harassment, discrimination and retaliation lawsuit by a tenured professor against the University of Minnesota’s School of Music is headed to trial. Same problem. The Administrators don’t care.
These dirty old men picked the wrong woman to pick on.
If this professor had denied Germany's WW2 crimes his article would have been retracted. But war crimes in Asia are different?
I and thousands of others asked journal editor Jonathan Klick (@pennlaw) to retract this article. All he did was ridicule us. nytimes.com/2021/02/26/wor…
Sorry Professor Klick (@pennlaw). The objections that I and thousands of others, including two Nobel Prize winning economists, had to a "peer reviewed" article justifying wartime rape and sex slavery were not "incoherent."
Retract the article NOW! leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2021/02…
Nazi Germany's war crimes and crimes against humanity included but were not limited to the Holocaust. Some, not all, of these crimes were prosecuted. Same for Japan. Accepting historical revisionism and calling it "scholarship" makes it more likely it will happen again.
As usual blogger Brian Leiter (he's taking a break from attacking my Minnesota exploratory committee) is defending Amy Wax's right to say these racist things and keep her job.
Same guy who said law deans must be silent about racism and the killing of George Floyd. Go figure.
There are limits to "free speech":
A president who tells an angry mob to go to the Capitol while Congress is in session and "fight like hell" should be FIRED - PERMANENTLY!
A law professor who says Black students are inferior and there are "too many Asians" in should be FIRED!
We need leaders who will fight crime and racism, leaders who will support the police but have zero tolerance for racism in policing.
Too many of these politicians don''t get it. Race baiting is as destructive as defunding the police. duluthnewstribune.com/news/minnesota…
There may be no more racist police officers than there are racist professors (I've dealt with a few here), but in both cases racists need to get fired. There is no "freedom" to be a racist and keep a job. People who don't get that do not understand the rule of law.
As for the DFL, too many politicians knew about racial profiling in policing and did nothing and said nothing about it. One former City Council member, a lawyer, even admitted it on the record in Falcon Heights in 2016 (minutes, pg.6).
Vote them out! falconheights.org/home/showdocum…
There will always be those who put the self interest of an institution and the inflated egos of their colleagues within it over standing up for what it right.
That's true of many institutions but such behavior in the U.S. Senate is destroying democracy. nytimes.com/2022/01/13/us/…
Given a choice between supporting inflated egos of "colleagues" in my line of work and supporting the rule of law and abolishing a vestige of Jim Crow, I would choose the latter. @kyrstensinema and @Sen_JoeManchin choose the former.
American democracy now is on life support.
We see collaboration among "colleagues" to pursue selfish ends and ignore wrongdoing in the church, in universities, in business organizations, in police unions and elsewhere. But the U.S. Senate is supposed to REPRESENT US. @kyrstensinema and @Sen_JoeManchin DO YOUR JOBS!
Ridiculous, but this is what I told Reuters would happen if the GOP gets control of the House or Senate. reuters.com/world/us/anoth…
On ethics @POTUS is batting 95%. The White House should have nothing to do with Hunter Biden's art sales (the president has no obligation to control his son) and there are too many problems with the Biden name being used by @PennBiden, a private organization, but that's about it.
Problems with @PennBiden are: 1) Penn uses the Biden Center to raise money and Penn solicits large foreign donations, 2) the 2017-19 professor appointment Biden had with Penn is now over; 3) Penn's inability to fire a racist professor; and 4) Penn is elite, expensive and private.