Perusing @ProfMJCleveland ‘s thread on the excellent brief filed on behalf of Carter Page by @McAdooGordon , to me the single biggest claim is the one that we know the least about: the so-called “leak strategy” referenced in Lisa Page’s texts to Strzok, concerning leaks of
classified information, including the fact that there was a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page as a Russian agent. Here is @@ProfMJCleveland on that subject:
We know that former staffer with the Senate Intel Committee, Michael Wolfe, pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI about leaking to a reporter, who happened to be his mistress, the fact of the C Page warrant. But the “leak strategy” referenced by Lisa Page went beyond that single
incident. The “leak strategy” didn’t target Carter Page. Rather, it was a coordinated effort to destroy Trump and his presidency, by painting the false narrative that he was a pawn of Putin and had surrounded himself with traitors and spies. Leak followed on leak, from anonymous
sources, throughout the first half of 2017, creating the false narrative that many liberals still believe is true. The leak strategy is part of Carter’s lawsuit, because the strategy included unlawful disclosure of the warrant targeting him as a Russian agent- a warrant, by the
way, that was obtained and renewed through fraud on the FISA court by the FBI. Leaking the existence of the warrant and what it meant put Carter at the center of Trump’s traitorous dealings with Russia, according to the false narrative, and damaged his reputation immeasurably.
This part of the lawsuit will be especially fascinating to watch, as it goes to the heart of the scheme to destroy a presidency.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In a brilliant interview by @JanJekielek on Epoch Times, novelist and essayist @walterkirn describes our plight in the face of what he calls the “hydra-headed monster,” the bureaucracy: “We sit squarely in the middle of an absurdist drama.” Highly recommended.
There are gems upon gems throughout the interview. For example, Kirn takes on elitism. His view is that the elites believe it to be their job to “engineer and bring about right behavior,” using tools the masses don’t know are being used. Think psyop campaigns. Kirn is not a
conspiracy theorist. He even rejects the idea that he’s a contrarian. Rather, as someone who lives in a small town in Montana and knows the owner of the local hardware store, he has seen first hand what the elites with their increasingly absurd edicts have wrought.
This WSJ opinion article raises an interesting issue with respect to the duties of the Solicitor General who argued the mandate case last week. As the article describes, the CDC has acknowledged that vaccines do not stop the spread of the Omicron variant, which now represents
A lawyer owes an ethical duty of candor to the court, which in practice means that when a lawyer cites facts or authorities, for which there are contrary published authorities or facts in the record, the lawyer owes an ethical duty to point out the contrary facts and opinions.
This one contains some new allegations not raised before by others. First, the lawsuit outlines what’s characterized as the “Schiff Playbook.” Taken from Schiff’s recent book, Jones alleges that in reliance on techniques developed during two Trump impeachments, Adam Schiff
developed a playbook for the “draconian use of Congress’s coercive powers to bypass assertions of constitutional rights.” The playbook’s features include: a) refusal to resolve assertions of privilege in court; b) creating public crimes of obstruction for assertions of
As @Techno_Fog reported, on Friday the Durham team filed a pleading in the Danchenko case, suggesting the court take note of a potential conflict Danchenko’s new lawyers may have, because a lawyer who joined the firm in 2021 as “of counsel,” represented the Clinton campaign and
some campaign members. That new lawyer is Robert P Trout, who also appeared as attorney for John Podesta when he gave a deposition for the HPSCI. At the time Trout was affiliated with his own firm. During the Mueller investigation, Trout represented Hope Hicks, and he defended
Bijan Rafiekian, who was charged with FARA violations arising out of his business dealings with Mike Flynn. According to Durham’s filing, Trout’s new firm, Schertler, Onorato, Mead & Sears, have created a Chinese wall to protect the confidences of the firm’s new client, Danchenko
Durham’s team filed a pleading in the Danchenko case that describes a potential conflict of interest involving the law firm representing Danchenko. The issue is that a lawyer who’s of counsel to the firm, Robert Trout, represents the Clinton Campaign and certain unnamed members
of the campaign. Trout is not on the Danchenko case, and the law firm has agreed to “wall” Trout off from the lawyers representing Danchenko. Nevertheless Durham asks the court to address the issue, to satisfy itself that Danchenko has been properly advised of the conflict and
has willingly agreed to waive it. The pleading sends some very clear signals as to where Durham is heading. He states that Danchenko could end up being at odds with the campaign as they may try to blame one another for the false statements that ended up in the Steele dossier.
Peer reviewed October 2021 paper by Russian physicists suggests impact of CO2 on global warming is grossly exaggerated in climate models due to error in analyse. They claim doubling CO2 leads to average global warming of only 0.33 degrees C. Observed warming is from water vapor.
I’m not a physicist, but this seems like a big deal. What these Russian scientists say is missing from most climate scientists’ analyses is the recognition that an emitter of infrared radiation such as CO2 is also an absorber. Including that math into the current models