THREAD II: And now on to the second brief filed by @carterwpage attorney, with @McAdooGordon serving as local counsel. This brief responds to GOVERNMENT's motion to dismiss. The other brief was the 8 individual actors: This is DOJ/FBI as entities. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
2/ Interesting. Didn't realize this was part of relief sought:
3/ Yup, that's just what our government did:
4/ Synoposis of full argument:
5/ With zinger to close introduction:
6/ A great point: This wasn't about Page--this was about Trump!
7/ Still trying to zero in on who the actual leaker was. Doesn't matter if they were all in on it but the emails b/w Strzok and Page (see THREAD I) are suggestive.
8/ Back shortly: Math & lunch time for DS.
9/ Reading on to see if they are identified...
10/ These are Page's claims against government as an entity. The FTCA is basically a federal statute that allows you to sue it under basic "tort" principles that apply to business/individuals.
11/ Patriot Act claims are based on gov't unlawful use of information gathered. Here, Page claims gov't unlawfully used info in "media leaks" strategy and also in later FISA applications.
12/ Also, on point that warrant was issued to they are all protected, this argument is solid:
13/ This paragraph is a perfect capsulization of why SOL has not expired.
THREADETTE: There were several telling exchanges during yesterday's SCOTUS argument in Trump v. Slaughter, but the one that struck me most was the final exchange between Justice Jackson & Slaughter's attorney. Read the full exchange below. 1/
2/ The problem is fundamental! Article I of the Constitution vests in CONGRESS the power to legislate--not unelected bureaucrats! And this ties into a second point: Jackson, Kagan, & Sotomayor all stressed Congress's "reliance interests" in creating "independent" agencies
3/ with the threesome arguing Congress relied limits on President's removal authority in granting agency regulatory authority. Well, there is a much bigger reliance interest at stake!
😡😡😡ABSOLUTELY. DISGUSTING! So-called "Republican" Dan Schaetzle is smearing my brother Jamie O'Brien, who is huge MAGA (might that be why?). While a local story, Schaetzle's behavior should be make him anathema in not just politics but polite society! 1/
/2 Also shame on @16NewsNow for pushing Schaetzle's preferred narrative that it is about my brother when more accurately Schaetzle is claiming the County never should have sought pension for ANY County Council attorneys most (all?) of whom were Dems before my brother.
@16NewsNow 3/ Here's the backdrop on Slimy Schaetzle's plot with details from Amy Drake.
Holy CRAP! A district court judge entered an injunction that allowed the states that had processed 100% of SNAP without authorization to keep the money! Trump is still seeking stay of lower court's order to fund SNAP with school lunch money. 1/
2/ Trump Administration calls out 1st Cir.'s ridiculous reasoning. This in essence is the problem: