In 1968, UC Berkeley hired Eldridge Cleaver, a convicted felon and Black Panther leader who called raping white women "an insurrectionary act," to teach a course as part of its inaugural Black Studies program.
The left-wing revolution has always been subsidized by taxpayers.
The "coddling of the American mind" thesis is dead-wrong. The precursors to "wokeness" were already in place during the 1960s. They simply adapted the language of "white privilege," etc., as a method of social manipulation. It's feigned weakness as a strategy to accumulate power.
In a sense, Cleaver and the other antecedents of "wokeness" were at least honest about their intentions and their methods. They advocated pure revolution, which has now been passed through the language of HR and psychotherapy.
The frustrating part of our debate now is that our language is comprised almost exclusively of euphemisms. They have filtered the ideology of the Black Panthers through the vocabulary of the hyper-empathetic bureaucracy: "equity, inclusion, belonging, compassion." Utterly fake.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The brilliance of Glenn Youngkin's executive order on critical race theory is that it merely clarifies and strengthens existing civil rights law.
Now the Left has to take the unenviable position of opposing the principles of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The "centrist" argument that anti-critical race theory legislation is "censorship" is bunk for the same reason. The Civil Rights Act already restricts speech in schools and workplaces. Do the centrists support abolishing it? And if not, are they, too, enemies of "free speech"?
The real innovation for the New Right is to strengthen civil rights laws to protect *all groups* and stop ceding administrative authority to the left-wing bureaucrats who dominate the existing civil rights apparatus. Youngkin is executing on this beautifully.
The ethnic studies director for Seattle Public Schools created a fake identity as an oppressed Latinx, married a convicted child molester, and pressured her child to become transgender.
It's not an exaggeration to say that woke politics is driven in significant part by mental instability, personal pathology, and sexual deviancy. Activists such as Tracy Castro-Gill project their own neuroses onto society and hijack public institutions to "cure" everyone else.
Washington State designated this woman Teacher of the Year. And, under the current moral framework that dominates big-city public education, they made the logical choice: fake identity, personal pathology, and identity-based grooming are rewarded.
BREAKING: Following a lawsuit from parents, the State of California has permanently removed the "In Lak Ech Affirmation" from the state curriculum, which would have forced students to chant to the Aztec god of human sacrifice in order to become "warriors" for "social justice."
I broke the story about this curriculum for City Journal last year. Parents took immediate action—and now they have won. city-journal.org/calif-ethnic-s…
Congratulations to attorney @PaulJonna, who represented parents and forced the State of California to abandon the controversial curriculum, which violated students' right to conscience. When parents stand up for their kids, they win.
Fact-checking is truly the lowest form of journalism.
Last year, AP did a laughable "fact check" on the Biden DOJ going after school board protestors as "domestic terrorists." Editor @KarenMahabir locked her account and has been hiding ever since.
Cowardly hairsplitters who run interference for the regime.
The issue isn't vaccines or the FBI—it's that our purportedly neutral news organizations are all voluntarily coordinating in service of the dominant left-progressive ideological regime, then laundering that political agenda through the pseudo-scientific "fact checking" process.
My goal this year is for 10+ state legislatures to pass curriculum transparency bills, requiring public schools to make all teaching materials easily available to parents via internet.
It's time to get the political predators out of the shadows—and return power to families.
The strategy here is to use a non-threatening, liberal value—"transparency"—to force ideological actors to undergo public scrutiny. It's a rhetorically-advantageous position and, when enacted, will give parents a powerful check on bureaucratic power.
The Left will expect that, after passing so-called "CRT bans" last year, we will overplay our hand. By moving to curriculum transparency, we will deflate that argument and bait the Left into opposing "transparency," which will raise the question: what are they trying to hide?