$BABA cloud business is being completed missed by the market.
Let me explain why Alibaba Cloud, which makes up just ~10% of LTM revenues, could become worth more than the entire current market cap by FY25
1/
Alibaba Cloud made US$9.2 Billion in revenue for FY21 and grew 33% YoY.
They have ~38% market share of the cloud industry in China. Which is slightly more market share than AWS has in the US.
2/
In their investor presentation, $BABA projected that the cloud market in China will grow at a 37% CAGR until 2025.
The IDC estimated the CAGR to be 33% over the next 5 years.
The global cloud market is estimated to grow at 17.5% annually.
3/
If we take the IDC’s more conservative annual growth estimation of 33%, and $BABA maintains their 38% market share, they would generate $28.8 billion of revenue in FY25.
Alibaba cloud even benefit from scale economies and continue to take more market share.
4/
If we apply a 10x sales multiple we get to a $288 billion valuation for the cloud business in FY25.
Analysts typically value AWS, Azure & Google cloud at closer to 15x sales. So a 10x multiple for a company with more domestic market share and a higher CAGR isn’t unreasonable
5/
The $288 Billion FY25 valuation is equal to 88% of the current $BABA market cap. Whilst it currently contributes to just ~10% of the total revenues.
The upside from Alibaba cloud is something the market seems to be missing, although it is uncertain.
6/
I’ll discuss China’s cloud industry in depth in my newsletter write-up on $TCEHY which is out in a few days.
$SPOT is a dominant market leader in music streaming, above $GOOGL, $AAPL & $AMZN.
They are also now market leader in podcasts, taking over $AAPL last year.
2/
After a 46% decline from ATH, $SPOT now trades at ~3x NTM sales and ~11x NTM gross profit.
If gross margins expand in FY22, it maybe be closer to 9-10x gross profit.
3/
@TSOH_Investing made an interesting point of $SPOT possibly being the only company below a $50 Billion market cap with the potential of reaching 1 billion MAU.
As of Q3 2021, 24% of total revenue came from domestic gaming & 8% from international gaming, so 32% overall.
2/
Tencent’s LTM revenue is $87b, therefore $27.8b came from gaming.
If we look at the $MSFT acquisition of $ATVI for $68.7b as a guide, they are paying 7.6x revenues for the gaming business.
3/
$TCEHY gaming business at 7.6x sales is worth $211 billion.
Tencent’s gaming business is a faster growing & higher quality business compared to $ATVI with a much lower customer acquisition cost and incredible exposure through WeChat & QQ.
UK value firm Phoenix took advantage of beaten down stock price in 2018 and & have played an activist role.
They have increased their position twice, now owning ~30%. The CIO of Phoenix, Gary Channon is temporary CEO at $DTY currently. Old management has been replaced.
Since the IPO in 2004, Tencent has returned ~45% annually to shareholders, turning $1 into $553.
Let's have a brief look at what returns could look like moving forward over the next 5yrs...
1/
Let's start with a base case.
@JordsNel from Vineyard Holdings put in the hard work with his deep-dive that I highly recommend. He shared the est. global industry 5Y growth rates weighted against Tencent's revenue (see below).
Jordan's weighted avg. growth rate was 14.6%
2/
Let's round that up to 15% which is still conservative considering China's CAGR in each industry is likely to be above the global avg.
Additionally the capital allocation from Pony Ma & management + the dominant market positioning is likely to lead to much higher returns
My largest position in my portfolio is a ~45% weighting in an Australian micro-cap. The company is Kelly Partners Group $KPG.AX
Here is a brief introduction to my highest conviction idea..
2/
Kelly Partners is a specialist chartered accounting network founded by Brett Kelly in 2006. They listed on the ASX in 2017 and now have a ~$200m market cap.
Since 2006, revenues have compounded at 32%. The business has doubled in size on average every three years.
3/
Founder & CEO Brett Kelly owns 50.4% of Kelly Partners. The partners, management and board of directors make up another 8.9%. So overall, the insider ownership is 59.3%
Management are aligned with shareholders and incentivised to create long-term value.