Believing and perpetuating myths and misconceptions about trans athletes is harmful. Denying trans people the right to participate is discrimination and it doesn’t just hurt trans people, it hurts all of us. ImageImageImageImage
There is a long legacy of sex discrimination in sport. Myths, such as the idea that physical exertion would harm women’s reproductive systems or that women were inherently inferior athletes, were historically used to “protect” women out of participation. Image
The marginalization of trans trans & intersex athletes is rooted in the same harmful history of gender discrimination and stereotyping that has impeded the achievement of gender equality in sports as a whole. ImageImageImageImage
Old stereotypes regarding athleticism, biology, and gender are being directed at transgender girls, who are frequently told outright that they are not girls (and conversely transgender boys are told they are not really boys).
This policing of gender has been used to justify subjecting transgender athletes to numerous additional barriers to participating in sports, from onerous medical requirements to segregation in locker rooms to outright bans on their participation.
The truth is, transgender women and girls have been competing in sports at all levels for years for over 46 years, and there is no research supporting the claim that they maintain a competitive advantage.
These stereotypes are also being invoked in the arena of professional sports, where so-called “gender testing” has been used to police the bodies of women of color and intersex women.

medium.com/the-establishm…
The @WorldAthletics
has targeted athletes like Dutee Chand and Caster Semenya for testosterone testing based on arbitrary limits. The current regulations, which Semenya is challenging, requires 46 XY intersex female athletes to undergo unnecessary medical....
...treatment to suppress their hormones in order to compete.

XX women should be concerned whenever an alleged concern for “protecting” their wellbeing is invoked to justify exclusion.
We’ve seen these arguments play out with the harmful and debunked “bathroom predator” myth, where false concerns for cis girls and sexual harassment have been used to promote legislation banning transgender people from public restrooms.

abcnews.go.com/US/sexual-assa…
We’ve seen it harnessed by legislators like those in America, the UK and Australia who have capitalized on transphobic comments to push for bills , which would ban all trans youth from playing sports in school consistent with their gender identity.
One thing is clear: The politicians who introduce these anti-trans bills luke the #HB500 are not concerned with the integrity of girls’ athletics, any more than proponents of bathroom bans are concerned about preventing gender-based violence.

4vawa.org/ntf-action-ale…
We must see these efforts for what they are: fear mongering intended to push transgender and nonbinary people out of public spaces.
When misinformation about biology and gender is used to bar transgender and intersex girls from sports it amounts to the same form of sex discrimination that has been used against all women in sports for over a century.
In 2022 sports should look for ways to support all girls who want to participate in sport, rather than attempt to police gender on the basis of impermissible sex stereotypes.
The new @iocmedia gender Framework has made it possible for us to reimagine sport. Sport with an emphasis on prevention, & athlete health wellbeing & safety. This reimagining would pre-empt the endless circular debates about fairness that dehumanise the very people that compete.
The new IOC framework may also elevate people to a better understanding of human diversity, which we should be cherishing for what their efforts and accomplishments teach us about being human. It would shift the focus to them as athletes and people.
I am bullish on the IOC’s new framework. I feel the new direction will pay dividends throughout sports. It is treating us all as individuals instead of a monolithic community. That is a number one paradigm shift. That is what I fought for from day one in this discussion.
Left out of the framework is the focus on direct regulation of blanket endogenous levels for transgender women. In its place, the new framework focus on evidence-based, sport-specific solutions that use sport results and lab results as the measuring stick.
The arbitrary T (testosterone) level made no sense. There was no assessment of speed, no assessment of endurance, no assessment of strength or physique.
The new IOC framework, suggests that restrictions for participation should be based on, “data collected from a demographic group consistent in gender and athletic engagement. No longer can sports use proxies for trans athletes such as @WorldRugby did.
The IOC & sports moving forward cannot introduce blanket T levels. The IOC understand the legal precedents involved, led by the case of Canadian cyclist Kristen Worley, who first took the Union Cycliste Internationale to court after being the first trans athlete to submit to
gender testing after the initial Stockholm Consensus in 2003. Worley won a settlement from both the UCI and Canada’s national governing body for cycling in the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in 2017
after it was determined that the policy calling for forced reduction of testosterone was detrimental to her overall health.

crossingthelinesport.com/story/kristen-…
Kristen with evidence base science proved beyond any doubt that androgen deprivation is a serious illness and that is what they have forced athletes like @CarolineLayt, me and athletes like Caster and we’ve all become unwell.
Kristen choose to lose her career to fight for the better cause because this isn’t just a trans or intersex issue. This is a women in sports issue and we wouldn’t be here without Kristen Worley. Image
In this episode of The Trans Sporter Room -- I talk about Why the IOC Framework Can Work even in full contact sports such as @WorldRugby. I also talk about why the T blanket policy was removed.

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the…
This new policy reflects some of what I have been pushing for years, namely a framework that is built around each individual sport & athlete. I talk about the effects that transitioning has had on myself & why I am is so encouraged by the new IOC policy.
podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/out… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kirsti Miller

Kirsti Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KirstiMiller30

Jan 28
@BritishCycling trying to reach out to you to talk about you recycling failed policy. Your new trans guidelines is a breach of human rights and harms the health of affected women. Image
In 2017, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario recognised that policies originating from the IOC had infringed the human rights of cyclist Kristen Worley.
@ukantidoping
sportsintegrityinitiative.com/worleys-case-o…
Due to IOC policies regarding gender, the international cycling union (UCI) denied her the testosterone her physiology needed in order to maintain normal health, causing her medical and psychological harm. Image
Read 68 tweets
Jan 27
It has been argued by the likes of Tucker & Hilton et al without evidence that cisgender women athletes could be at greater risk of physical harm and injury if they compete in sports with larger and stronger transgender and intersex athletes.
This is the basis of World Rugby’s ban on trans women. According to the report prepared for World Rugby, trans women who transition after male puberty retain ‘significant’ physical advantages over cisgender women — even after they take steps to lower their testosterone levels.
The report claims advantages include being 30–40% stronger and more powerful and 10–15% faster.101 Importantly, the report concludes these advantages create at least a 20–30% greater risk of injury for cisgender female rugby players competing against transgender female players.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 26
All these clowns that have said Laurel Hubbard at 10nmol/L competed in Tokyo, with up to 10 times the amount of T than an XX women don't have a clue. Laurels T levels have been under .04nmol/L since 2012 impossible for her to have any higher. She met the rules of the 2003 policy.
At 3minutes 20 Laurel confirmed in 2017 that she competes under the rules of the 2003 IOC policy meaning she was more than two years post operative when she first competed in the women's category. Her injury in 2018 was a direct result of CAD.

I spoke about the serious consequences to health Laurel was forced to compete with in this interview. My prediction cane true Laurel competed with a massive disadvantage.

Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Sports like #WorldRugby blanket banning #transgender women on safety grounds place themselves on a slippery slope. Safety has no gender!

austlii.edu.au/au/journals/Ad…
A separate trans policy is not necessary to address physical safety risks in sports. It is the disparity in size/strength that is relevant, not the source of the disparity.
Assessing any group of athletes as a monolithic group especially amongst trans athletes is flawed. Trans is an umbrella term many different body stages of transition & body types. ImageImage
Read 26 tweets
Jan 19
Pride Games is not just about celebrating Pride out on the sporting field!
Way before celebration of Pride there is an urgent need for all sports to develop programs & solutions to these problems to improve youth mental health, boost physical activity rates, & mitigate the negative influences of traditional gender norms.
Although there has been more progress on the issue of homophobia in sport, there was a LOT more work to be done on issues affecting trans people. Trans athletes in sport are being attacked by the likes of Trump even our PM @ScottMorrisonMP called us heavy handed in cricket.
Read 32 tweets
Jan 18
Academics and leading scholars in the fields of Kinesiology, Law and Policy, and Gender Studies agree that trans women DO NOT have an inherent advantage are not a threat to women's sports. ⁦@FallonFox⁩ ⁦@AlanaFeral
@DrRyanStorr
athleteally.org/future-womens-…
This document
athleteally.org/wp-content/upl…

utilizes a close reading of peer-reviewed, credible sources to better understand trans athletes, to dispel misinformation about trans athletes that has spread in recent media and political debates,
to outline critical legal and policy discussions about trans athletes, and to highlight why access to sport matters for everyone.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(