Drew Holden Profile picture
Jan 26, 2022 19 tweets 13 min read Read on X
🧵Thread🧵

It seems not all cases of a president swearing at a reporter are created equal.

When Trump used an expletive about journalist Chuck Todd, it was a crisis.

When Biden did the same thing to Peter Doocy? Well, let me know if you can spot a different attitude.⤵️
First, some context. Back in 2018, then-President Trump called Chuck Todd, host of Meet the Press, a “son of a bitch” at a rally. The MSM was apoplectic.

Yesterday, Biden used the same term in response to a question from Fox’s Peter Doocy during a presser. This time, no outrage.
@politico captures the difference well.

Back when Todd was on the receiving end of an insult, Politico wrote a piece titled “When the president of the United States calls you a ‘son of a bitch’” but when Biden does the same he’s just making “plain his opinion” about a reporter.
Not to be outdone, @CNN got out ahead of the comparison, jumping in to play PR for the Biden White House in response to the outburst.

I’m guessing a “How Peter Doocy responded to President Biden’s vulgar insult” piece isn’t on the way.
I know that plenty of others have dunked on @brianstelter for suggesting Trump’s quip would “expose journalists to threats and intimidation” but ICYMI Stelter then went on to suggest the hubbub this time was because people are…deprived of political authenticity.
She has me blocked but it wouldn’t be a thread if it didn’t point out that @joyannreid is entirely full of it.

From deep concern about Trump’s use of an expletive and attacks on the media to Biden winning Twitter for the same behavior.
Speaking of media figures who don’t always act in good faith, it doesn’t appear that we’re getting another #stayclassy call out from @atrupar
With Todd, outlets like @HuffPost practically tripped over themselves to quote the victim about the terrible message that it sent to kids that the President would swear in public.

But now, the hand waving is about Biden calling Doocy - I kid you not - “a not so nice name”
We saw the same thing out of @NYMag. When it was Todd, we got a morality play about Trump and children.

But when the Bad Orange Man is no longer the offender? Well, it’s just “a level of candor [Biden] probably should’ve reserved for the Oval Office.”
And once more, this time from @TheWrap: when it’s Trump, it’s Chuck Todd on to bemoan how Trump’s words are a “challenge to all parents.”

Odd how we don’t see that type of hand-wringing when the vulgarity comes from Biden.
Beyond the media, we’ve seen plenty of folks treat these very similar situations radically differently.

Here’s newfound decency advocate @WalshFreedom.
Perhaps my favorite is @funder, who suggested that “Trump should be forced to resign for calling Chuck Todd a son of a bitch.”

But when it’s Biden? It’s just “fake outrage.”
Apparently @danpfeiffer no longer thinks a dig against a journalist is an indication that someone shouldn’t have the nuclear codes.
I don’t usually put people without a blue check on blast but I couldn’t not include this about-face from @PaulaChertok.
These from @NancyLeeGrahn presented without comment.
And of course many were eager to explain how Trump’s comments were of deep concern who haven’t said anything about Biden doing the same thing.

I’m not holding my breath for similar takes from:
@jayrosen_nyu
@MoveOn (lol)
@MarkHertling
@sbg1 (“this is so hard to watch”)
Needless to say, that goes double for @WHCOS @RonaldKlain, who you may recall once suggested that perhaps Rep Waters would have a hearing about Trump’s language, or something.
Look. I get it. The president swearing at a reporter is far from the biggest news these days.

But it isn’t lost on millions of Americans that so many people in and around the media are putting their fingers on the scale when it comes to reporting on the President.
I get that this whole situation is silly, and so I’m not gonna wax poetic about it any more.

But it’s worth reminding folks about the sort of naked hypocrisy that many in the media have grown comfortable with on issues both large and small.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
🧵Thread🧵

Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.

Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.

Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.

That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…Image
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.

I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.

The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.

An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(