Taking all comers,
and knowing enough
about
all the things
that they can then process
and help turn almost any complaint
into a diagnosis and treatment plan.
If you are lucky,
you have a doctor who knows you,
but they probably
don't know
exactly
why you are coming in today.
(In a walk-in setting, they don't know you🙄)
In either case, the work they need to accomplish in each appt is... estimated.
*reminder, every appt in primary care incl:
S-taking a history to figure out what is going on
O-making observations about how you are +/-review tests
A-review above & making a list of "diagnoses" for the day
P-creating a plan for each diagnosis
+writing note
+other paperwork
The demand for appointments is high, so we try to see as many people as possible
In BC,
the average # appts/ hour ~5,
that is 12 minutes each
That's to do EVERYTHING for each undifferentiated presentation in the day
talk to you
examine
decide
explain
answer ?'s
document
etc
Well...
If the appointments are too short...
make them longer, right?
It can be hard to predict which appts will be longer
sometimes someone finally feels comfortable enough to share a deep fear, & the doctor REALLY wants to hear & support that, even if she runs late, AND...
there has been some work done on how to best schedule and plan for primary care needs
BUT...
we can't really use it in most places because of the
SECOND ISSUE,
the primary care structure being stuck in 1980's
Primary care in the community
ie "having family doctor"
is FUNDED by
paying the MD's
for each visit (=fee for service)
And the usual visit fees (="0100") have not changed much since they were first offered.
And the doctors need to pay for their rent, staff, supplies, PPE, etc from that amt, = "overhead"
Usually 30-40%, so now it is ~100$/h
fewer visits/h
means less $ to pay overhead
and
less to take home
They can't delegate work to skilled team members, because then they can't bill anything, AND, they would have to pay that person out of their other billings.
Imagine if we paid teachers per kid/per lesson?
Like how we fund public education, what we need is a reasonable definition of community needs, central funding to organize the care and then we hire the staff (MD's, NP's, RN's etc) to deliver the care.
To sum up
a key part of the #FamilyDoctorShortage
&
why your GP is always running late
is that we squeeze too many appointments into a day
+
we are stuck doing that
because of
how primarycare is funded
SOLUTION
Fund primary care as a service, not via MD pay (like schools)
Allow a CLINIC rooted in the needs of its community, plan for how long visits should be, what work can be best done by a social worker or RN or family doctor.
Don't expect each family doctor to build their own business that perfectly addresses health needs
(also, important policy note for BC, we have messed around with making changes to the 0100, adjusting for age etc, + adding new fees, & it HASN'T ⬆️ the # of doctors doing community-based primary care, when asked, they say they want teams&salary) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958382/
A 🧵 to explain
why we need a whole
new math equation
to actually
fix the problem of
equitable access to
🇨🇦primary care
1/
We only need 4400 family doctors...
2/
We have a shortage
because
the assumptions
of the math equation
are... wrong.
❤️🩹Not every patient has the same primary care needs
❤️🩹Not every family doctor provides community-based longitudinal care
❤️🩹Not every doctor can work 5 days/week, 52 weeks/year, forever
3/
What can you do to keep yourself as healthy as possible if you don't have a family doctor?
A🧵of (unofficial) ideas for "the unattached" 1/11
2/ ❤️🩹🩺
First, let's get this important caveat out of the way...
If you are VERY SICK
e.g. issues breathing
or chest pain
or you're bleeding excessively
or another urgent/emergency condition
GO TO THE CLOSEST EMERGENCY ROOM or CALL 911
3/ 🩺❤️🩹
2nd crucial caveat
If over the last 3-6 mon you
-had unintended weight loss >10lbs
-have drenching night sweats (& aren't experiencing menopause)
-blood in your stool/urine
-have a breast lump
Get seen by an MD < ~2 weeks, & tell them these things (in person>>virtual)
3/5 200 participants (FPs, NPs, Nurses, and community members) attended an educational webinar focused on opioid sparing practices and the (lack of) evidence for opioid analgesics to treat noncancer pain.
You can read more here: doi.org/10.1093/fampra… (3/5)
The REDONNA study doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.…
began from the motivation for improved & safer opioid prescribing in primary care
We aimed to educate MDs about their OWN prescribing practices using audit & feedback letters developed by the @Drug_Evidence@JanKlimas@ShawnaNarayan 1/4
They received information about the number of new opioid initiations & how they compared to the average physician. They were provided information on the (lack) of effectiveness on pain for opioid naïve patients through an educational webinar: doi.org/10.1093/fampra… (2/3)
From this study, we hope to support the uptake of quality prescribing practices that are equity-oriented and evidence-based to help patients experience less pain. (3/4)