1/ Woke education activists have decided that during math class *5th graders* should learn to, and I quote: "challenge the hegemonic structure of marriage."
It's not just Critical Race Theory, they're bringing woke gender theory into k-12
Gender theory in k-12:
a thread🧵
2/ This comes from a paper by Christopher Dubbs, education professor at East Stroudsburg University.
Dubbs wants k-12 teachers to use queer pedagogy (teaching methods) and to engage in "Queering Mathematics."
The key words for the paper are, of course, "equity" and "diversity"
3/ I will explain everything going on here so you can understand exactly what's happening.
Most people think the goal of a math teacher in k-12 is to teach math: to teach students how to do addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.
That's now how woke professors think
4/ As you can see in this video, woke teacher/activists believe teaching "Woke" Social Justice" is fundamental to ALL education.
In their view, the main role of the teacher is not to teach skills, it is to inculcate students into the "woke" Social Justice ideology.
5/ Here we have a woke teacher who does not know when America declared independence, and who says she doesn't teach the curriculum. Instead she chooses to teach things that aren't in the curriculum, such as "How to be an Anti-Racist" (which is the name of a book by Ibram Kendi).
6/ So we have to keep in mind that woke activist teachers see their job as being a political act.
That is, they see their job as being first and foremost to spread awareness and acceptance of their woke political ideology, agenda, and activism.
They say this explicitly:
7/ Why do they think this way?
In "The Critical Turn in Education" Isaac gottesman, explains how leftist brought Marxism into universities and radicalized education in the 70's (pic 1) and brought in Postmodern feminist ideas and critical race theory in the 80's and 90's (pic 2)
8/ There isn't time in this thread for the whole story, for now it's enough to know that from the 70's to the 90's activists (most notably Henry Giroux and Paulo Freire) succeeded in radicalizing education, and bringing in postmodernism, neo-marxism, and Critical Race Theory.
9/ The result is that there is now an entire cohort of teachers, activists, and radical professors who believe that k-12 education is a "site of struggle" where they are to engage in political action and to teach students to accept a particular sort of social justice politics.
10/ This is how you end up with a guy like Christoper Dubbs who wants to engage in "queering mathematics" in the name of diversity and equity.
So what does it mean when a professor wants to "queer mathematics?" What is he saying?
Let's discuss...
11/ In "Saint Foucault" David Halperin wrote:"'queer' does not name some natural kind or refer to some determinate object; it acquires its meaning from its oppositional relation to the norm. Queer is by definition whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant"
12/ This means that "queer" has no stable clear definition. In this context queer means to be opposed to and idea, concept, practice, or discourse that is seen to be dominant, legitimate, or normal. It is "an identity without an essence."
Read that again, then let's continue.
13/ On this view any idea seen as dominant, settled, correct, hegemonic, or socially legitimate needs to be challenged, undermined, subverted, and challenged. Why? because any idea that is dominant is though of as having power, and woke theorists want to undermine that power.
14/ This is why the woke ideas surrounding transgenderism are, in academic circles, referred to "queer theory."
They want to subvert and undermine our societies ideas about sexuality, and gender. They believe the idea that men and women are mutually exclusive categories...
15/ Is an oppressive social construct created by straight white men to oppress anyone who isn't a straight white man. They think that Straight white men used the ideology of "science" to legitimize their ideas about sexuality, and they did this in order to benefit themselves.
16/ The idea is that straight white men used their power to make the things straight white men become the standard by which all sexuality was to be judged, and that they used this power to oppress anyone who did not fit with their ideals. In other words, woke gender activists...
17/ Think the idea that there are differences between men and women, most people are straight, and this is a result of biology, is a set of ideas straight white men just made up in order to make everyone conform to their arbitrary standard of straight white male sexuality.
18/ As such they think all the institutions, ideas, practices, and customs that result from these ideas need to be "deconstructed" and "dismantled." As such we need to challenge everything from the legitimacy of marriage to the idea that men and women are biologically different.
19/ As Christopher Dubbs shows, they think the place to do this is in the grade 5 classroom...during math class.
And, as we have seen, from the perspective of the woke activist this makes perfect sense. They think that k-12 education is ought to be a site of political struggle
20/ And since they think teaching is a political act, they think a good place to begin to politically liberate themselves from the idea that men and women are biologically different, is the grade 5 classroom while they're supposed to be teaching your kids how to do multiplication
21/ This is what they are doing. They are not just trying to make gay students feel at home in the classroom, they want to challenge both the fundamental axioms of mathematics, and the structure of marriage as we understand it.
They are doing this to your children.
22/ Make no mistake, they are going to do this behind your back until you force them to stop. They won't back down, negotiate, or compromise. they think that to allow you to tell them "no" would make them "complicit" in the oppression of anyone who isn't a straight white male.
23/ Now that you know what is going on, the only question that matters is "what are you going to do about it?"
And you better do something or your kid is going to come home thinking there's no difference between men and women, and that 2+2=5
This is, again, the countercultural idea at the heart of the critique of mass society.
This version claims the "Christofascist conservative" vision requires repressive conformity, and thus creativity can only be found by those who rebel against the culture of Christofascism.
Since the 60's the political left has thought that there is a "mass society" that depends upon homogeneity and conformity in order to reproduce itself, and that the system brainwashes the masses so that they accept the repressive conformity the system demands.
Having accepted this view, the leftist countercultrual rebel concludes that great art is a product of rejecting the conformity that the system demands, and thus believes that great art can only be produced by those who rebel against the system.
1/ As Trump abolishes DEI departments, de-funds woke NGO's and non-profits, and removes woke activists from government, a large group of well trained political and social activists will watch their industry be destroyed, leaving them unemployed with no plausible career path...
2/ Activists, administrators, bureaucrats, and other credentialed members of the professional/institutional social justice left will be left without a job, and a resume that's only suitable for finding work in the very Social-Justice government-NGO complex Trump is shutting down
3/ This means the best trained and most politically extreme leftist organizers are going to be left broke, angry, and unemployed. They will have nothing better to do then street level activism where they can agitate and organize for their social and political revolution full-time
1/ The left is demoralized and exhausted, but they are not going away and will try to maintain their hold on cultural, education, and government institutions.
This is what happened in the 80's. Reagan won, but the left took over universities, schools, and cultural institutions.
2/ The fact that the right had won a significant political victory only made the left more desperate to take over the social institutions that make up our society.
So they went about taking over our colleges, universities, public schools, accreditation boards, and so fourth.
3/ The result was that even while it looked like the right was winning, the left was putting themselves in a position to control all of societies knowledge production and legitimizing institutions.
They made themselves the gate-keepers of respectable opinion.
The left owned our cultural institutions (Journalism, televsion, advertising, Universities, entertainment, social media, medicine, publishing, non-profits/NGO's, education, government) and used them to flood the culture with anti-trump messaging for a decade.
Trump still won.🧵
They spent a decade using a vertically integrated messaging apparatus to run anti-Trump messaging in every inch of the culture, 24/7, for a decade, while censoring, deboosting, suppressing anyone who pushed back against their extreme leftist ideas.
Trump still won.
The left had complete control of the institutions of: 1. cultural production (movies, music, books, magazines, art,) 2. knowledge production (universities, public schools, academic journals, scientific journals, accreditation bodies, colleges of education)
In 2012 a weird form of identity politics mixed with "social justice" emerged from academia and used social media to take over of journalism, the Arts and culture industry, NGO's, Non-profits, news media, and the government; and used that power to censor the rest of society....
Then, for the next decade, anybody who thought men and women are different, believed kids can't pick their gender, or judged people by character rather than race, was driven out of our societies institutions by mobs of online social activists screaming social justice slogans.
A group of social activists, moral entrepreneurs, and grifters, used their dominance of our social institutions and their influence online to create what amounts to a social and economic death star that they aimed at the reputation and social standing of anyone who opposed them.
Christianity began to recede because the plausibility of its claims had been degraded on multiple fronts by attacks from both postmodernism and secular humanism.
Part of what @jordanbpeterson has done is restore the plausibility of the Christian understanding of the world.
@PaulVanderKlay has been saying that @jordanbpeterson has been excising the spirit of secular materialism from the culture.
I agree with that, but what interests me is the way Peterson has done this. It isn't by providing a point by point refutation of Dawkins style atheism...
@PaulVanderKlay @jordanbpeterson Rather, what he has been doing is a revivification of Christianity by rehabilitating the underlying the worldview and understanding of the way he world works. You can see this quite clearly in his recent conversation with Andrew Huberman (@hubermanlab)....