Germany's original sin is that didn't use all its powers to push back against aggression from the very beginning. It should have learnt this lesson after WWII. ft.com/content/25b54d…
Where Germany got the idea about a strategic partnership with Russia from is also a mystery to me. My Mother always told me to never associate with criminals. Germany should have known this too. It was obvious what kind of Putin is even before he became president.
Further, even if Germany liked to see Nord Stream 1 and 2 as commercial energy projects it was obvious they were Molotov - Ribbentrop part II for Russia. A knife is lethal even if it can also be used to cut potatoes.
Some say Scholz is worse than Merkel but keep in mind it was Merkel who approved Nord Stream 2 within a year after Russia started the war against Ukraine in 2014. Nord Stream 2 was probably seen as a nod of approval in Moscow.
That Schröder wasn't ostracized for working for Russia years ago shows a fundamental moral problem within the German Social Democratic Party, SPD. A moral deficit of sorts.
Now there are signs that Germany might finally come around and maybe finally start to oppose Russia. But that it should take a war in Georgia, eight years of war in Ukraine and almost an outbreak of a major war in Europe for that to happen is remarkable.
Germany's place in Europe, as the leading economy with the largest population, should be that of a moral and concrete leader of Europe. Germany should take responsibility and set good examples for others to follow, not be a drag and shy away from pulling its weight.
If Germany finally took the role as a leader in Europe things would change dramatically and those changes would benefit us all, not the least Germany. A prosperous, democratic and secure Europe is good for all of us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Germany could just say it out loud: We lack the spine to take a stand against Russia, and since the U.S. and NATO protect us we have no reason to take a stand in the first place. Better enjoy the benefits from not spending on the military and do business with the autocrats too.
Sweden on the other hand stands on the barricades for human rights, at least as long as it doesn't have a negative business impact on HM, Volvo, Ericsson, IKEA, Atlas Copco, Scania, Alfa Laval, or any other Swedish business.
Americans, and others, who claim that Russian speakers in Ukraine are pro-Russia because of the language they speak should ask why English speakers in America revolted against England and created the United States. Because it's about ideology and belonging, not language.
Then look at ethnicity. How many of the Americans who revolted against the English were ethic Englishmen? I bet a large part of the supporters of American independence were ethic Englishmen, so why did they revolt? Because was not about ethnicity, it was about ideology.
Americans typically identify along certain shared values and are proud to call themselves Americans. Despite this I have met many Americans who express pride in their heritage. Was JFK foremost an Irishman or an American? Heritage is one thing, current identification another.
Putin is being compared with Hitler also by German politicians now.
"Putin is using the same arguments for protecting people in other countries as Hitler did."
- The foreign policy speaker for CDU in the German Parliament, @juergenhardt.
'Dialogue' must be the most useless term in international politics now. Who ever suggested cutting phone lines, internet, diplomatic relations and international platforms? Maybe 'dialogue' is the new 'concerned', a word to show I read the memo but wont act on it.
'Dialogue' is like walking into a shop to chat with the attendant with no purpose to buy anything. The attendant will lose interest in me soon enough. No, I go to the shop to buy something, the dialogue might be a part of the purchase process, but it's not the goal in itself.
Instead of saying "we must have dialogue" diplomats should say what they want to achieve, or at least know that themselves, before going into dialogue to achieve those preset goals.
Putin is a good tactician and great at spotting opportunities. But Putin is a lousy strategist. Long term he is weakening Russia's position to a point were breakup is a real possibility. Don't forget that.
Putin couldn't manage Yanukovych so Ukraine was lost and as revenge Putin made sure the most pro-Russian voters would lose their influence in Ukrainian politics.
Instead of mediating Lukashenka's departure Putin went all in to support him, which will eventually make the friendly Belarusians turn against Putin and Russia.
Global protests against the war in Iraq in 2003 were some of the largest the world has ever seen.
When Russia is about to attack Ukraine, the "peace" movement is completely silent. This phenomenon has to be scrutinized. Photo from London. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_Februa…
The COVID pandemic is a reason not to have street protests but there is plenty of space in media and online. But also there the "peace" movement is completely silent.