Good morning from New York.

Michael Avenatti's cross-examination of Stormy Daniels yesterday began during the last 10 minutes of the trial day. Today, the questioning kicks off into full gear.

Follow along live with me, @LawCrimeNews.

ICYMI: lawandcrime.com/high-profile/h…
Stormy Daniels is back on the witness stand.

The jury is entering.
Highlighting Stormy's history as an actress, Avenatti asks whether that entails learning and reciting lines.

He then asks how many times she met with the government.

Six or seven times, five or six of which were in the last 30 days, she responds.
Yesterday, the government asked Daniels if she said she hoped Avenatti would be raped in prison. She acknowledged it. He asks her whether she remembers that. She says she does.

Q: You know that millions of people follow your comments, do you not?

A: (matter of factly) I do.
Avenatti asks Daniels about the meaning of the phrase "drop the soap."

Q: To have anal sex in prison, right?
A: I don't know.

Avenatti asks whether Daniels said on a podcast that she hoped he dropped something "over and over and over."

She agrees she did.
Q: Have you ever falsely accused anyone of a crime?
A: Not to my knowledge.
Avenatti pivots to Stormy Daniels's paranormal series "Spooky Babes" by saying; "Let's talk about this alleged television show."

Govt: Objection
Judge: Sustained as to form
Q: There has never been a single episode that has actually aired on television, am I correct about that?
A: Correct.
Avenatti rattles some of the paranormal experiences that are the subject of the show, including visions of a sobbing woman who cut her wrists and an anthropomorphized house Daniels refers to as "she."

Q: You talk to the house, right?
A: (frustrated) Yes!
When Avenatti asked about what Daniels perceived to be the physical effects of the house on her, Daniels referred to what Reiki scans detected.

A confused Judge Fruman asked what that means and has Daniels spells it.

Daniels: R-E-I-K-I
Avenatti says that Daniels once "I should keep my mouth should because me going around saying 'I see dead people'" because those comments could negatively impact open court cases.

Daniels: "Yes, I said that."
Q: How do you speak with the dead?
A: I don't know. It just happens sometimes.

Asked how, Daniels replies: "Cards. Meditation."

Q: And do the dead speak back to you? Do they communicate with you?
A: Yes.
Avenatti pivots to the paranormal doll named Susan on "Spooky Babes."

Q: According to you, Susan walks.
A: I've never seen her walk.

She adds that she's seen the doll in a different spot and didn't know how she got there.
Avenatti asks of "Susan," the paranormal doll.

Q: You heard her call you 'Mommy, mommy.'
A: I don't know if it was her. We assumed.

He asks her about tarot card readings.

"Technically, oracle cards," she corrects.

Q: You believe that you're a medium, correct?
A: Correct.
Avenatti asks Daniels whether she went on Michael Cohen's podcast and told him, "I did get my first couple of checks."

She agreed.
Avenatti asks whether she told Cohen "But my last big check, he intercepted by forging my signature" and claimed that she still did not get an accurate royalty statement.

She says she doesn't recall.
According to Avenatti, the second time on Cohen's podcast, Daniels said: "I got my first two payments. No issue."
Side note:

Yesterday, Daniels volunteered—seemingly apropos of nothing—that the paranormal doll Susan has an Instagram page. This is the one.
Q: Ms. Daniels, no one can tell you what to do, correct?
A: Correct.
Q: Ms. Daniels, you voluntarily picked me to be your attorney, correct?
A: I was out of options.
Q: I never sought you out initially for representation, correct?
A: Not to my knowledge.
Q: Before we met at the Waldorf Astoria, we had never spoken on the phone, correct?
A: We had not.
Avenatti asks whether this clause of their contract shows he's "entitled to a reasonable percentage" of a book deal.

Daniels: "You're very entitled, yes."
Avenatti asks whether people expect to be paid for work.
Daniels: "Of course."

Q: Why do you say 'of course'?
A: That's how we survive.
Stormy Daniels's book was dedicated to her daughter, whom she said reminds her of what really matters.

Q: Isn't it true that I wrote the dedication for your book?

She agrees and says that she approved it.
* "shut," not "should." #FridayTypos
After a morning recess, Avenatti asked Daniels about her Reiki scan.

Daniels said it was performed by an energy worker and yoga instructor.
Court proceedings during the Michael Avenatti trial usually break for lunch at 11:30 a.m. ET, but it's been pushed back until 12:30 p.m. today due to weather.

It's snowing heavily outside.

Questioning continues.
Questioning turns to Stormy Daniels's arrest in Columbus, Ohio in 2018, which she said was politically motivated by pro-Trump police.

Vice officers were later fired over the incident. nytimes.com/2020/01/24/us/…
Q: In 2018 and 2019, what did [Denver] Nicks do for you?

A: He was my publicist.
Q: Isn't it true that I was typically nice and respectful to you?

A: You lied to me. That isn't respectful.

Asked if she told the government he was nice and respectful, Daniels replies: "Yes, you were cordial. Always."
Avenatti presses whether she told the government he was nice and respectful.

"I was wrong," Daniels replies.

Avenatti objects to the answer as non-responsive.

Sustained.

He asks the question again, and she responds in the affirmative.
Avenatti asks whether Daniels ever wrote anything in her book contradicting her assertion that she didn't like him and tried to fire him three times.

She says doesn't know how to answer.

Q: "Let's break it down. 'Did you write'—you understand that right?"

AUSA: Objection.
Judge: Sustained. Mr. Avenatti...
Lunch recess.

Back in 45 minutes.
We're back.
Avenatti confronts Daniels about her public statement that rumors of her hush-money payment from Trump were false.

He says that's false, undermining her claim to always tell the truth.

She denies it was misleading because she says Michael Cohen paid her the money.
After Avenatti asks about her denying a 'relationship' with Trump, Daniels replies: "I did not have a 'relationship' with Donald Trump"
Q: What is a fact?

Objection.
Sustained.

Q: What do you understand a fact to be?

Objection.
Sustained.
Avenatti quotes Daniels previous denial of her affair with Trump: "I am denying this affair because it never happened."

Q: That was a complete lie. Wasn't it?
A: No.
Avenatti says Daniels told Anderson Cooper the opposite.

Daniels: "I don't consider being cornered getting out of a bathroom having an affair."

Avenatti objects as non-responsive. Judge sustains, instructing her to answer the questions.
Q: What is more important to you: being honest with this jury or being honest with Anderson Cooper?

AUSA: Objection.
Judge sustains, tells Avenatti to move on.
Avenatti asks Daniels whether she admitted in her book whether her January 2018 statement denying her affair with Trump was "complete bullshit."

Daniels: "It is complete bullshit."
If you need to catch up on the background of the case or the story so far, read my coverage of the morning session here.

Avenatti asked whether Daniels that as of Feb. 4, 2019, she believed that "everyone" was "fucking [her] over."

Q: Did you ever state to me on that date that 'Everyone was fucking you over'?
A: Yes.
(Context: Avenatti falsely told Daniels at that point the publishers hadn't paid her third check, even though the agent sent it to him months earlier, prosecutors say.)
Avenatti asked about legal matters he worked on for her.

Q: I filed the NDA case on behalf, is that correct?
A: Yes.

Q: Did you win that case?
A: It was dismissed.

Q: Did you win the case?
A: I don't know.

He asks whether she told people she won.

Objection.
Sustained.
Avenatti: No further questions at this time. Ms. Daniels, thank you.
That was less than the six-hour cross examination than Avenatti estimated, though it was more than four hours.

Redirect begins.
AUSA starts off with Avenatti's q-s about Daniels believing "everyone" was fucking her over.

Q: That week, did you learn who was fucking you over?

Avenatti: Objection. Argumentative.
Sustained.

AUSA: That week, did you learn anything about your relationship with the defendant?
The prosecutor shows Daniels the message she sent Avenatti on Feb. 19, 2019, and asks her to describe it.

Daniels: I sent him a screenshot of the amount and dates of my payments that were sent to him instead of to me.
Re-cross:

Q: Isn't it true that you were interested in terminating the defamation case?
A: No.

He notes that she had her subsequent lawyer pursue it to the 9th Circuit.
Avenatti's last question doesn't connect:

Q: If you never wanted to pursue the defamation case, why did you pursue it for approximately three years?

AUSA: Objection.
Judge: Sustained.

Stormy Daniels is excused from the witness box.
Quote got botched here.

His claim was that she wasn't interested in terminating it but in pursuing it on appeal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Jan 27
Good morning from New York.

Stormy Daniels is expected to be called to testify later today in Michael Avenatti's trial. Before the jury enters, Avenatti informs the court that he anticipates a six-hour cross examination.

"We'll see about those six hours," Judge Furman replies.
Avenatti's former lawyer Sean Macias remains on the witness stand.

During cross-examination yesterday, Macias testified he was "shocked" when Avenatti told him in 2018 he was "jammed up" and needed a $250,000 bridge loan.

"He was the top lawyer on TV and everything."
Macias testified on Wednesday that Mark Geragos paid him that money. Macias also said then he was enthusiastic that Avenatti might run for higher office.

Today, Avenatti says Macias sent him a text message about getting him some ‘Do, re, mi” so he could "run like a banshee."
Read 60 tweets
Jan 25
"U.S. Appeals Court Affirms Conviction for Drug Lord 'El Chapo,' Rejecting Defense Claims of 'Breathtaking Juror Misconduct'"

Coming soon: Expert @MitchellEpner explains why the 2nd Circ's ruling shows "major hurdles" for Ghislaine Maxwell.
lawandcrime.com/high-profile/u… @lawcrimenews
Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal goes to the Second Circuit, and her request for a new trial is governed by its precedent.

In rejecting a new trial for El Chapo, a three-judge panel reiterated the high bar for even probing alleged juror misconduct. Image
That said, Epner—a former sex trafficking prosecutor—noted that the juror conduct at issue here is different from the Chapo case.

Chapo's appeal involved "unsworn, uncorroborated statements" by "one unidentified juror."

In Maxwell, the juror is known and spoke widely.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 24
Good morning from New York.

Michael Avenatti's federal trial accusing him of defrauding Stormy Daniels is about to begin.

Covering it live for @LawCrimeNews.
Proceedings begin:

Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government

Avenatti's attorney Robert M. Baum for the defense
Judge Furman notes that the jury is all vaccinated.
Read 25 tweets
Jan 20
Edward Vallejo, charged in the same seditious conspiracy indictment as Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes, has a federal detention hearing that is about to begin.

He allegedly discussed “armed conflict” and “guerilla war.”

Listening in, for @LawCrimeNews
Vallejo is represented by federal defender Debbie Jang.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Boyle presides.
AUSA:

"This is not an individual who was staying at home yelling at a television screen."

Instead, Vallejo is someone who brought an "arsenal" of weapons across the country.
Read 14 tweets
Jan 14
BREAKING:

Martin Shkreli must pay a $64.6 million fine and is BANNED FOR LIFE from "participating in the pharmaceutical industry in any capacity," a federal judge ruled.

DEVELOPING story, @LawCrimeNews. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/j…
The $64.4 million is disgorgement to the states.

I'm reviewing the 135-page (!) breaking ruling to see what, if any, other liability Shkreli may face as the result of today's decision.
That ruling is embedded in the story.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11
Good morning from New York.

A hearing is scheduled to begin shortly in the case of @MaryLTrump v. Donald Trump.

Covering the proceedings virtually, @LawCrimeNews.
New York County Supreme Court Justice Robert R. Reed presides over oral arguments on the defendants' motion to dismiss.

The attorneys are:

John Quinn for Mary Trump

Gary Freidman for Maryanne Barry

James Kiley for Donald Trump
Up first, Freidman for Maryanne Barry

He says his two main arguments are that the claims are time-barred and covered by the terms of the broad release agreement.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(