US warns Russia conflict with Ukraine would be ‘horrific’ as tensions simmer theguardian.com/world/2022/jan… The words used to describe the situation like "panic" are not helpful. I was an Indications & Warning officer. You go through your checklist based on Soviet/Russian doctrine. You
2/ You look at the indicators changing from green to yellow to red. At some point, they are ready to invade. The hardest thing to determine is intent. IMHO Putin is trying to divide NATO, divide the EU; to create fissures in the alliances. His ultimate objective is the US out of
3/ Europe. Short of that, he wants Europeans to view the US as an unreliable ally. Putin wants to dissolve NATO. We simply have to stick to our guns. And make it clear to Putin that another invasion of Ukraine is going to cost his army, his mafia, and himself dearly. We should
4/ continue arming and training Ukraine's territorial defense forces--a strategy Ukraine borrowed from Tito. Tito was not going to defeat the USSR. Tito wanted to bleed the USSR to death. The Yugoslavs were going to use their terrain & TD units to wage guerrilla war against the
5/ Soviets. Second, we ought to now start figuring out how to get Ukraine into the EU. Put them on the on-ramp and step on the accelerator. The EU, World Bank, etc have to move ahead faster.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Scaminaci III

James Scaminaci III Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @4GWDOTDOTDOT

Jan 20
EXCLUSIVE: The Oath Keeper Podcast Interviews - New Insights Into Jan. 6 and Continued Threats justsecurity.org/79889/exclusiv…
1/ These Oath Keeper podcasts with Ernest HANCOCK add a second person involved with the so-called "continental congress" staged by Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty, the Christian Reconstructionists' Constitution Party, and elements of the Libertarian Party: Hancock. He was a
2/ founding member of the "continental congress." Here are the receipts: splcenter.org/get-informed/i…
Read 6 tweets
Jan 13
The FBI arrested Stewart Rhodes, head of Oath Keepers, and Edward VALLEJO of Phoenix, AZ. My research files contain an "Edward Vallejo" from Arizona. At one time he was a member of the 9/12 Project from Pinal County, AZ. He was a member of Tea Party Patriots and a member of the
2/ Ron Paul Campaign for Liberty in Phoenix. He was also a delegate to and signer of the "Articles of Freedom" at the right-wing "continental congress" organized by the Ron Paul movement, the Christian Reconstructionist's Constitution Party, and elements of the Libertarian
3/ Party. Vallejo was a member of End The Fed and the John Birch Society, according to his bio for the "continental congress." Among the "Articles of Freedom" was a call to abolish the Dept of Homeland Security and establish militias in all 50 states under the auspices of the
Read 18 tweets
Nov 18, 2021
Pentagon inspector general raises questions about former D.C. Guard commander’s Jan. 6 account washingtonpost.com/national-secur… There is another criticism of former CG Walker that has not been made, though it is glaringly obvious. The DCNG has about 1,100 troops. In Walker's own 03 March
2/ testimony had 320 Guards personnel, to include a 40-person QRF ready. In Q&A, he confirmed the 340 number. In another Q&A, he said the QRF was ready to go at 1500h. In another Q&A, he stated half of his 300, that is 150, had been helping the MPD control traffic and the other
3/ 150 were on stand-by to relieve the guards with the MPD. So, if he had 190--the 150 plus the 40-QRF, why did only 155 show up at the Capitol? Why didn't the 150 on standby show up? Why weren't more called in? CG Walker made a great show of how stressed he was by the events.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 11, 2021
For those concerned about Fox News in particular and right-wing media in general, I saved this quote from Noel Malcolm's book, Bosnia: A Short History (p. 252). "But having watched Radio Television Belgrade in the period 1991-2, I can understand why simple Bosnian Serbs came to
2/ believe that they were under threat, from Ustasha hordes, fundamentalist jihads or whatever. As the independent Belgrade journalist Milos Vasic put it to an American audience, it was as if all television in the USA had been taken over by the Ku Klux Klan. 'You must imagine a
3/ United States with every little TV station everywhere taking exactly the same editorial line--a line dictated by David Duke. You too would have a war in five years.'" The US as a whole is not saturated with that problem, but Fox has managed to move the GOP base towards David
Read 4 tweets
Nov 8, 2021
The Inevitable Rivalry foreignaffairs.com/articles/china… via @ForeignAffairs Both articles in Foreign Affairs, by Giddis and this by Mearsheimer, leave unmentioned the role of business elites during a potential conflict or run-up to a conflict. M alludes to it. American capitalists are
2/ heavily invested in China. The PRC accounts for 28% of global manufacturing. Russia is not even in the top 10. During Cold War I, the US rigidly controlled technology transfers to the USSR. Except in nuclear weapons & space, the USSR was not an economic competitor. The PRC has
3/ built-in advantage in having a potentially strong pro-PRC bloc in the US business community. And, in all fairness, if we think we have supply chain problems now with a pandemic, how much worse would it be if the PRC used its industrial leverage in a time of crisis? Both FA
Read 7 tweets
Sep 18, 2021
The Scientist and the A.I.-Assisted, Remote-Control Killing Machine nytimes.com/2021/09/18/wor… After the gee-whiz, isn't this an act of war? How can you argue that Iran's response is not a legitimate act of self-defense? I'm not pro-Iranian. But there are rules of land warfare.
2/ There is international law. Suppose some country decided to assassinate our scientists because they were working on a project that jeopardized a key weapon system of theirs. Would their attack be legitimate? Would we just go, "shit happens, too bad"? Or does the US & Israel
3/ believe one set of rules do not apply to them and the rules only apply to others? If Iran killed one of our most senior generals as retaliation, would we not object? And so what are legitimate weapons now? Well, AI-directed robots. Roadside IEDs. Suicide bombers.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(