1/ Interesting supplemental filing from Durham. Horowitz must have complained that Durham publicly exposed him. But the supplemental filing does not address the crucial issues, i.e. it does not address Horowitz's lies and omissions about Sussmann, it only covers Baker's phones.
2/ Remarkably, even though the supplement is limited to Baker's phones, it is speculative on that issue. Horowitz says it's "likely" Durham was told about the phones in 2018. Durham says he does not recall being told. Be that as it may, the main issue is left totally unaddressed.
3/ Never mind what was or wasn't said in 2018. The point is that Horowitz failed to disclose his possession of the phones in Oct 2021 when Durham specifically requested any information that may be relevant to the Sussmann case (Baker is the main witness, his phones are relevant).
4/ Durham's latest filing just covers the bases. He doesn't want to be accused of concealing anything. No big deal. Much bigger deal is why Horowitz complained about this to Durham in the first place, especially on such flimsy grounds. My guess is that Horowitz is nervous.
There are many ways we know it came out of the lab. This is probably still the best reason.
Daszak's explanation as to why he didn't have a conflict of interest is mind-bogglingly insane. Yet, instrad of taking down Daszak's fraudulent natural origins letter, the editor of the Lancet (himself a CCP stooge) spent a year negotiating with Daszak. What is going on?
2/ On January 24, 2017 @SergeiMillian was falsely outed as the primary source for Steele’s dossier by @MarkMaremont of @WSJ. Maremont identified Millian as being the individual named as both source D & E in Steele’s dossier.
3/ Maremont claimed that “Some of the most explosive parts of a dossier containing unverified allegations that President Donald Trump had secret ties to Russian leaders originated from” Millian. The allegations attributed to Millian are crucial to the Steele dossier.
-you claim that Steele is respected
-you try and make it look like Republicans had something to do with the dossier
-you absolve Hillary
-you fail to tell your readers that NOTHING has been corroborated
-you claim that questions over the dossier are "partisan attacks"
-you unskeptically repeat misinformation about GOP funding
-you mislead your readers about the fact that Steele hasn't been in Russia in decades
-you unskeptically parrot Clinton lies nytimes.com/2017/10/24/us/…
This one is particularly egregious:
-you again misdirect about GOP funding of the dossier
-but then you go all in on creating false innuendo about the role that Washington Free Beacon and Paul Singer might've played in creating the dossier
Franklin Foer, the stenographer who wrote the fraudulent Slate article smearing Trump and Alfa, sent Fusion GPS an advance copy of that piece after having been told "time to hurry".
Slate was very excited about smearing Trump and Alfa.