Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jan 29 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
This is a verified blue tick Times columnist still spreading the discredited false claim that Brexit somehow advantaged the UK when it comes to the vaccine.

Has long since been fact checked to death and found false by many separate sources.

Status: Flat Earth.
Here's the Channel 4 Fact Check team...
channel4.com/news/factcheck…
BBC Fact Check

"But the idea that Brexit enabled the UK to press ahead and authorise [a vaccine] is not right.

It was actually permitted under EU law, a point made by the head of the UK's medicines regulator on Wednesday."

bbc.co.uk/news/55163730
Full Fact
fullfact.org/health/coronav…
Institute for Government
instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/covid-vac…
France24
france24.com/en/tv-shows/fa…
So this isn't an "opinion" matter. There's aren't two sides to a fact.

Brexit did not help the UK vaccine rollout, period.

Also worth noting: it's a marathon not a sprint, and the EU is ahead of the UK on vaccinations now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡

Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uk_domain_names

Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 31
Banging the populism gong wildly, Boris Johnson's apparently going to try and change the EU system of flight compensation for a home-grown alternative.

Of course, the effect is predictable: if this costs airlines more, they'll raise the cost of flights to the UK to compensate. Image
Remember, the UK's sovereignty stops at our borders. So any change can at best only affect two categories of flights:
A) Flights by UK-registered airlines
B) Flights originating from or ending up in the UK

A) will encourage more airline firms to move domicile away from the UK.
Going back to the Express article, it's vital to note that all that's actually been announced is the start of a consultation process.

So UK consumers will see zero benefits "now" and the compensation scheme remains exactly as it was.

Journalists? Liars.
express.co.uk/news/uk/155832…
Read 4 tweets
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 30
The Daily Mail health reporting team are a real piece of work.

Yesterday, there was a throwaway comment about Scotland's missing covid stats (invalidated the entire article) and today both NI and Scotland's stats are missing - the latter unacknowledged.

And look at the wording! ImageImage
NI and Scotland are running at about 8,000 new daily cases at the moment, meaning the Daily Mail disregarded the missing 8,000 cases to calculate its nonsensical statistics and produce an utterly false headline.

It's not a secret that the data is delayed (see below) - just LOOK! Image
So it wasn't "the lowest tally since December 14" at all, because that involves an 8,000 case fiddle factor.
Read 6 tweets
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 29
The Express are ranting about an EU law that the UK can now repeal.

There are two gaping flaws with this:
1) The EU recognised the issue and has already changed its own law
2) The EU has also allowed member states to diverge from EU law to eliminate the last dregs of the problem Image
Here's the EU's existing revision to the old EU law in question (it would have been revised for us too had we still been a member, but we're stuck with the "dated photocopy" we made pre-Brexit)...
eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2021/2…
And here's an analysis last year describing how the EU fixed the problem, and how the UK needs to play catch-up.
12ft.io/proxy?q=https%…
Read 6 tweets
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 29
We're now nearly two years into the pandemic.

Have you noticed that the main UK government sources of information still de-emphasise the primary source of transmission (droplets and aerosols in the air) and over-emphasize the danger of catching it from surfaces?
It's particularly telling when you compare with international information (WHO, Mayo Clinic, EU etc.) which all place a much greater emphasis on the primary transmission route of droplets and aerosols suspended in the air, sometimes for hours, after they're breathed out.
This seems honest. It's in the middle of a long document from the Cabinet Office: "Coronavirus: how to stay safe and help prevent the spread"

But all the stuff about airborne transmission, speaking, singing etc. magically disappears in other core docs.
gov.uk/guidance/covid…
Read 5 tweets
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 28
BBC's "justification" for inviting those who've refused the vaccine onto Question Time. (They're now having to screen applications for rabid anti-vaxxers.)

Ridiculous non-logic, because belief in a Flat Earth can't put the lives of others at severe risk.
theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2…
Can you imagine the mindset of someone who's essentially saying: "f*** reality - if people want to believe stuff that's KNOWN OBJECTIVELY to be untrue, we should give them a platform anyway"?

Having them anywhere near the flagship national broadcaster is beyond ridiculous.
It's the old "from the point of view of representation, Mrs Miggins the pie shop owner knows as much about international trade as customs specialists" Brexit argument all over again.

Except this time it's deadly.
Read 5 tweets
Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture
Jan 13
The Express touts letting more immigrants into the UK as a major benefit of Brexit.

Once more, with emphasis.

The ***EXPRESS*** touts letting ***MORE IMMIGRANTS*** into the UK as a major benefit of Brexit.

Unbelievable hypocrisy. Just staggering.
express.co.uk/news/politics/… Image
And as per usual with the Express, most of their website visitors will only ever see the headline.

Why? Because the headline, and only the headline, gets automatically syndicated all over the site.

And very very few people who see it (comparatively speaking) will click through. Image
So all they'll see is something vague and undefined being touted as:
A) Simple
B) A Brexit breakthrough
C) Under the UK's control

And think "aha, another Brexit positive".

And they'll never realise what the Express are actually advocating for.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @uk_domain_names has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @uk_domain_names!

Read all threads by @uk_domain_names

:(