Jamie's wording here is aimed at making you think that the pandemic has triggered a huge increase in psychiatric/suicide related call-outs in Wales.
The graph below is correct, but let's take a closer look...
1/
Actually you don't need to take that close a look to see that there's something odd with the data. Only 1 case in 2017, rising to 28 in 2019 - all before the pandemic.
So it looks like there are data quality issues here. A change in reporting method maybe?
2/
Let's look at a monthly analysis next - I've helpfully split out the period before any restrictions started, and you can see that the big increase was all prior to the pandemic taking hold.
It looks like a reporting change happened in late 19 - so nothing to do with COVID.
3/
And here's Jan and Feb, which in 2020 predated the pandemic, and you can see the big increase again.
Indeed the figures are higher in 2020 than in 2021 at the height of the second (Alpha) wave when the country was in lockdown.
4/
As a senior ex-ONS employee, for balance Jamie might also have mentioned his former employer's assessment that suicides were significantly lower in the first quarter of the pandemic, giving a slightly different picture to that he tries to paint.
Jamie's misleading tweet with the implication it gives has been RT'd 367 times so far.
6/
Mental health is of course a very important issue, and more so during the very difficult times we've had over the last 2 years. But it's important not to overstate the issue, as @statsjamie has done, for what motivation he has.
7/
If you are struggling, and need help, or have otherwise been affected by these issues, here are some links to services which are there to help you, including the @samaritans helpline on 116 123.
Update:
Jamie has issued a clarification, after the Medical Director for the Welsh Ambulance Trust stepped in to the discussion (in a way not exactly helpful to his position, shall we say).
Surprise, surprise, Jamie's followers seem less inclined to RT the clarification, meaning that in terms of coverage the damage is done, and the retraction is much less impactful than the original tweet, which remains at the time of writing.
10/11
And the opportunity to properly put the record straight, with an image from the link showing the clear statement from the ONS that suicides actually fell in 2020 is missed with the blandest of statements instead.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A great thread on the state pension and National Insurance.
For me, the trailed abolition of NI and thus its replacement by general taxation in terms of funding state pension benefits will have a major generational redistribution of tax.
It’s been the case that (in aggregate) at any one time the working generation funds the SPs of the retired generation above it.
2/
If the abolition of NI results in an increase (albeit smaller - else why bother) in income tax, whilst those in work will in total be better off, pensioners will be worse off.
3/
The Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association has updated its guide to living costs in retirement. The full report is well worth a read, and goes into a lot of detail.
One key point is that it assumes that pensioners own their home outright - probably reasonable now, but the shift to renting means that in future years that may become increasingly questionable.
2/
It focuses on retirement income, but note that other sources may be used to fund retirement, whether it be income from savings/investments, or gradual withdrawal of capital. Much more likely to be relevant for those aspiring to a comfortable lifestyle of course.
3/
UKHSA estimates that prevalence of COVID in England and Scotland has nearly tripled in the month since the ONS restarted its COVID infection surveillance.
Fortunately prevalence is lowest at the oldest, more vulnerable age groups, but is estimated at just under 6% in the 18 to 44 age groups.
2/
Prevalence is estimated to be highest in the London area, at just over 6% across the population. Note though that confidence intervals are wider due to lower sample sizes than in previous studies.
So with the news this morning that the earnings growth announced today means the state pension (SP) will very likely increase by another 8.5% next year, it's time to set out once again why the SP triple lock (TL) is such a bad idea.
1/
It's all down to cherry-picking the best of the three rates each year. I did a thread nearly a year ago, that hopefully sets out clearly how the mechanism inevitably means that the SP will grow over time against both earnings (E) and prices (P).
With BH's still distorting individual weeks' figures, the cumulative position gives a better view, with the latest CMI age-standardised analysis showing mortality 3.8% (of a full year's mortality) worse than its reference year of 2019.
Here's the mea culpa - it was only wrong by a factor of 13, but at least the post has been deleted rather than just corrected and left up, when experience shows that only a fraction of the original audience will see the correction.
So what are the true numbers?
2/
In E&W the peak week in 2020 was just under 9,000, and the second wave peak was pretty close to that number.
In total ONS has recorded 199,728 COVID related deaths in E&W since the pandemic started.