Spotify "losing $4 billion of value" doesn't mean they lost $4 billion or that $4 billion worth of business was taken away from them by cancelations.
It's referring to the market valuation of the company. It's not nothing, but it's also not quite money.
Like so many tech companies presenting as media companies, presenting themselves as a solid choice for investors is a big part of their strategy. "Line go up" = success. But the line going down is temporary until it's not.
If you've been wondering why Spotify isn't panicking or why "spending $100 million to lose $4 billion" doesn't immediately trigger a reversal, it's because they don't yet have any reason to fear their share price won't recover.
That's possible. But shareholders with enough of a stake for Spotify to listen are here for a long time, not a consistent time. If they have faith in Spotify's future, they might just buy in more, since there's currently a discount.
Friendship ended with Wordle, now Vampire Survivors is my best friend
I will probably keep playing Wordle. It just wasn't something I thought of today the way I did the other days since I started playing.
Vampire Survivors is not anything like Wordle but I feel like they both exist within a similar space of games that have figured out ways to sort of gently caress the addiction buttons.
On this note, if I say something like "Mute _____ if you don't want to see this thread." or talk about how I am threading about D&D or Muppets to shake loose the new followers who don't want that content and you reply "Joke's on you, that's why I'm here," I 100% despise you.
A tweet isn't about you if it isn't about you. I cannot stand people who take a tweet that is not in any way speaking to or about them and reply in a way that simultaneously acknowledges that a statement has targeting parameters that exclude them, while making it about themselves
"Mute if you don't want to read it."
"But what if I DO want to read it?"
Then you read it, Blichael. You read the thread if you want to read it. You and twenty-three of your most asinine friends really had to jump in and seek clarification on that point?
So that "own a color on the blockchain" thing is less of a pipe dream and more of a pipe nightmare. It's a system you have to opt in to. This dude has created a pseudo-financial ecosystem where joining it means you have to agree you'll pay money every time you create art.
The thing is, there isn't a "smart contract" that's smart enough to know every single time you use a color. Even if you've opted in, you could use whatever colors you want and mint them through an unconnected protocol. It requires voluntary cooperation every step of the way.
Which, I mean, it's good. It's good that this joker can't actually use arbitrary code to lock you out of using a digital color combination freely whenever you want.
But it demonstrates how every promise made by NFTs and crypto is a lie. "Smart contracts" require participation.
Every time I'm not watching Star Trek Discovery, I forget that Tig Notaro is on this show as an ascerbic lesbian Star Fleet engineer named "Jett Reno" because this information is too awesome to retain.
Like, "Jett Reno, hotshot engineering genius from the future" is obviously a character she made up after casually wandering into a shoot one day.
...oh, actually, my mistake, she's not one of the "from the future" characters. I mean, she's from the 23rd century, which is the future relative to us, but she's not one of the characters from the future of the future.
As handy a metaphor as the Emperor's New Clothes is about speaking truth to power, I feel like the relative ease of conning people who are desperate to be seen as wise and in the know is an under-discussed aspect of it.
In the story, it's not just the threat of going against the Emperor socially that keeps the crowd going along with the illusion. The core of the swindle is that the ability to see the miraculous, magical garments is held up as a test of the viewer's intelligence and competence.
NFTs and crypto currency generally grow via cult-like dynamics, one of the key ones being the appeal of secret knowledge that elevates the holder and makes them special and powerful.
No, YOU spent an hour yesterday researching heraldic tinctures and attitudes to make a "blazon code" (cf. handkerchief code) for a sci-fi Omegaverse setting.
It's like... okay, the gender-equivalent dynamics of this world require people to be able to signal multiple statuses to each other, along with what they're looking for, in a way that's distinct and visible at a distance outside of pheromone range, and it has to be standard.
And then it's like, oh. There is an already existing visual language with standardized vocabulary that incorporates animals of different orders/ranks, postures, directional movement, with a limited but expressive color palette and room for additional notations.