WA state is weighing whether to include covid vaccine as a requirement for school entry. As part of this process, a BOH Technical Advisory Group has been tasked with evaluating this vaccine against 9 criteria. Here I’ve highlighted each criteria, along with key observations. 🧵
CRITERIA 1: ACIP Recommendation
ACIP has recommended vaccinating school-aged children. However, it should be emphasized that during this discussion with ACIP the FDA specifically warned AGAINST MANDATING this vaccine in 5-11 year olds.
Question is how well the “vaccine prevents individuals from contracting the disease”. With undeniable spread of Omicron among fully vax/boosted, it’s fair to demand more compelling evidence that vax in school kids significantly prevents spread.
CRITERIA 3: Cost Effective
A parent may need to stay home to care for a child with minor vax side effects. In the context of a non-sterilizing vaccine with boosters annually or more often, the potential loss of wages could add up significantly. These costs are hard to quantify.
CRITERIA 4: Vaccine Safety
The FDA has stated that the covid vaccine is safe for children. It should be noted that other countries limit these vaccines to only children at high risk, partly due to concerns about potential risks, and overall risk/benefit assessments.
CRITERIA 5: Prevent Severe Outcomes
Severe outcomes from covid are extremely rare in school-age children even without vaccine. The FDA vaccine trial in this age group was too small to prove a significant reduction of this already low occurrence.
CRITERIA 6: Reduce Transmission in Schools
The CDC has stated covid vaccine does not prevent transmission. With the emergence of Omicron it’s unclear how well vax may reduce infection/transmission, and whether this reduction is enough to compel mandatory use in school children.
CRITERIA 7: Public Acceptance
Currently only 25% of 5-11 year olds in WA are fully vaccinated. It’s clear there is significant hesitancy among parents. Mandating vaccines in schools would be highly divisive. If forced, many students would likely disenroll from public education.
CRITERIA 8: Administrative Burdens
Monitoring vaccine compliance is already a huge burden for school officials. Tracking vaccine records for a seasonal respiratory virus that may require frequent boosters w/multiple individualized schedules would be an administrative nightmare.
CRITERIA 9: Parent Burdens
Aside from transportation and time, we should also consider burdens of exemptions. How might exempt students be excluded from attending school? Do those exclusions fall disproportionately on certain demographics? What if parents can’t afford childcare?
SOURCE: Info on the WA BOH decision-making process related to requiring vaccines for school entry per WAC 246-105-030 and associated TAG criteria can be found here: sboh.wa.gov/Portals/7/Doc/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: This morning I investigated resources posted in an anti-ICE Signal group. I quickly found this disturbing link detailing the origins of these highly organized anti-ICE networks.
CrimethInc is a private-donor funded site with a known history of fueling extreme activism. They clearly state that the goal of these anti-ICE Signal groups is to increase confrontation and coordination in order to facilitate illegal harassment and obstruction of ICE agents.
They don’t even try to hide it!
I’ve documented more findings in the thread below. 👇🏼
Counter-surveillance has long been a critical element of their mission. Protesters and observers meticulously stalk and record ICE agents’ vehicles while maintaining a comprehensive searchable database of license plates.
This database is actively weaponized to target and illegally harass federal agents.
In the aftermath of two tragic protester deaths it is incredibly unsettling to see this extremist site aggressively promote ‘infectious courage’ while discouraging ‘overcautiousness.’
All while praising protesters who ‘use their bodies’ and violently attack federal agents.
🧵This 2024 federal funding audit from the WA State Auditor exposes an astonishing failure of accountability with a clear and persistent pattern of unauditable payments to the Department of Children, Youth, and Families totaling nearly $416 million dollars.
The findings are significant and also highlight over $76 million in additional questioned costs.
🚩“For the fourth year in a row, we are questioning all child care payments from the Child Care and Development Fund at the [DCYF].”
🚩”[DCYF] did not ensure payments to providers were allowable and properly supported, and did not comply with federal reporting requirements.”
🚩”[DCYF] did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to child care providers were allowable.”
The report does note corrective actions to resolve these issues with a timeline to improve accountability. But here’s the bottom line…similar findings have been REPEATING every fiscal year for at least the past four years.
This is completely unacceptable.
Remember, these tax dollars belong to ALL Americans, not just Washingtonians. We all need to push for accountability and transparency on how our money is spent.
More details and sources linked below.
I’ve highlighted the key findings here in red. This is a complete failure of oversight.
Among the fourteen agencies with findings, DCYF was issued the most findings by far.