WA state is weighing whether to include covid vaccine as a requirement for school entry. As part of this process, a BOH Technical Advisory Group has been tasked with evaluating this vaccine against 9 criteria. Here I’ve highlighted each criteria, along with key observations. 🧵
CRITERIA 1: ACIP Recommendation
ACIP has recommended vaccinating school-aged children. However, it should be emphasized that during this discussion with ACIP the FDA specifically warned AGAINST MANDATING this vaccine in 5-11 year olds.
Question is how well the “vaccine prevents individuals from contracting the disease”. With undeniable spread of Omicron among fully vax/boosted, it’s fair to demand more compelling evidence that vax in school kids significantly prevents spread.
CRITERIA 3: Cost Effective
A parent may need to stay home to care for a child with minor vax side effects. In the context of a non-sterilizing vaccine with boosters annually or more often, the potential loss of wages could add up significantly. These costs are hard to quantify.
CRITERIA 4: Vaccine Safety
The FDA has stated that the covid vaccine is safe for children. It should be noted that other countries limit these vaccines to only children at high risk, partly due to concerns about potential risks, and overall risk/benefit assessments.
CRITERIA 5: Prevent Severe Outcomes
Severe outcomes from covid are extremely rare in school-age children even without vaccine. The FDA vaccine trial in this age group was too small to prove a significant reduction of this already low occurrence.
CRITERIA 6: Reduce Transmission in Schools
The CDC has stated covid vaccine does not prevent transmission. With the emergence of Omicron it’s unclear how well vax may reduce infection/transmission, and whether this reduction is enough to compel mandatory use in school children.
CRITERIA 7: Public Acceptance
Currently only 25% of 5-11 year olds in WA are fully vaccinated. It’s clear there is significant hesitancy among parents. Mandating vaccines in schools would be highly divisive. If forced, many students would likely disenroll from public education.
CRITERIA 8: Administrative Burdens
Monitoring vaccine compliance is already a huge burden for school officials. Tracking vaccine records for a seasonal respiratory virus that may require frequent boosters w/multiple individualized schedules would be an administrative nightmare.
CRITERIA 9: Parent Burdens
Aside from transportation and time, we should also consider burdens of exemptions. How might exempt students be excluded from attending school? Do those exclusions fall disproportionately on certain demographics? What if parents can’t afford childcare?
SOURCE: Info on the WA BOH decision-making process related to requiring vaccines for school entry per WAC 246-105-030 and associated TAG criteria can be found here: sboh.wa.gov/Portals/7/Doc/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If a single sea turtle in CA choked on a plastic straw we’d be bombarded with hyperbolic headlines for weeks.
Yet *actual humans* have been breathing in this giant plume of toxic polyvinyl chloride for over a week in Ohio and…barely any news coverage? #OhioChernobyl
For more info, check out this thread from @JenWEsq👇
It’s discouraging to see that this list hasn’t budged since I last posted a month ago. But I’ve updated my graphic here to show the full snapshot.
Keep fighting! College 💉 mandates are coercive, reckless, & completely unnecessary.
Colleges requiring all students to get the bivalent booster as of 12/12/22:
Notre Dame
UCs/CSUs
Harvey Mudd
Pitzer
U of Denver
Yale
Hampshire
Harvard
Smith
Tufts
Wellesley
Goucher
Carleton
Macalester
St Olaf
Fordham
Kenyon
Wooster
Champlain
Whitman
This list doesn’t include hundreds of colleges STILL requiring a single booster (which now = bivalent by default in prev unboosted students) + hundreds STILL mandating original monovalent vax. There’s no clinical evidence to support mandating these shots in college students.