How is it NOT “embodied” when there are real bodies on the other side of the screen? Those are human beings on the screen, joining with their bodies via an alternative way of presence.
I don’t leave my body while on Zoom?
The problem is that too many dehumanize others in virtual space. That’s what happens with Twitter, etc.
Real humans are here, participating, reading & responding bodily - but many users don’t recognize the bodies they engage.
We’ve not yet grasped bodies vis a vis technology.
I promise you, my butt is really in this chair. My eyes really struggle to read the screen. My feelings really hurt when people are cruel.
Online life is experienced in our bodies.
Theologically, our understanding of humanity, creation, and presence are all begging for massive revision - and that revision will speak not only to the immediate issue of technology, but will open issues of patriarchy, racism, poverty, etc
Because the question of virtual worship (esp Eucharist) is ultimately a question of bodies - Whose body counts? Where is God’s body? What is the nature of embodiment?
To close or limit Eucharist (God’s body) guarantees the exclusion of some bodies and reifies injustice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm getting phone calls asking me how the Episcopal Church can harbor views like Tish Warren's on disability.
Because even smart pastors from other mainline denominations think she's Episcopal clergy! And think her newsletter represents our church.
TEC, we've got a problem.
I spent a good portion of my morning explaining to close friends that she's part of a break-away fundamentalist Anglican church that is NOT part of the global Anglican Communion.
The Episcopal Church is the recognized Anglican Communion partner in the USA.
NOT Warren's sect.
Her theological views in no way are shaped by or significantly represent those of the Episcopal Church.
Pretty certain Warren has never read Nancy Eiesland’s The Disabled God - because you can’t speak of embodiment w/o accounting for the church’s continuing exclusion of disabled people.
Eiesland: "For many people w/disabilities, the Eucharist is a ritual of exlusion & degradation. Access to this celebration of the body is restricted because of architectural barriers, ritual practices, demeaning body aesthetics, unreflective speech & bodily reactions...
...Hence the Eucharist becomes a dreaded & humiliating remembrance that in the church we are trespassers in an able-bodied dominion. For many at the margins of the institutional church, the Eucharist is ... 'a sacrament of disunion' ...
In the 90s/00s, it was an open secret that evangelical Xian colleges practiced affirmative action.
Toward which group?
White men.
At the time, most Xian colleges had wild gender imbalances - some as much as 70% W to 30% M.
This was for many reasons - young Xian women influenced by feminism, high achieving female students in app pools, &parents sending daughters to evangelical colleges to keep them "safe."
But the colleges worried that they'd stop being attractive to talented young women IF potential female students were concerned there weren't enough men in the dating pool.
So, many of the college strove to even out gender balance - trying to equalize around 60% W/40% M.
They’ve also successfully ignored, silenced, or punished those who formerly made these same critiques. I know. I’m one of their previous targets. 25 yrs ago they attempted to ruin me.
Social media was unavailable to me then. I had no tools to rally support. They held the cards.
Many - if not most - of the early critics were women. (Which, of course, makes theological and sociological sense.)
But there weren't that many evangelical women with doctorates and we were particularly vulnerable to powerful men running ALL evangelical institutions.
In those days, you had to figure out how to critique and survive.
I was too naive to understand that. I thought that sound academic critique was akin to truthfulness-and the "truth will set you free." So, I wrote, spoke, taught history & doctrine as honestly as possible.
The 1st creed, forgotten even by Xians, was of human solidarity:
"The original credo (was) something like this: For you are all children of God in the Spirit. There is no Jew or Greek, no slave or free, no male & female; For you are all one in the Spirit."
-Stephen Patterson
Patterson's stunning, award-winning book, "The Forgotten Creed," argues that the first Xian creed insisted on the unity of humankind in God. That it affirmed hope for a world where ethnicity, class, and gender could not be used to divide.
If you recognize that creed, it is because Paul borrowed it & included it in Galatians.
But, as Patterson suggests, it was actually the 1st baptismal creed.
The earliest creed is about justice. It didn't divide between "us" & "them," but was a creed making us all ONE.
When Manchin shifts now on Biden’s bill, it will confirm something I’ve thought obvious - Youngkin and Manchin have been in cahoots. Probably around some WV - VA oil and gas plot.
It is the only thing that explains Manchin’s behavior.
Think about it - Manchin holds off making VA Dems increasingly angry at Biden and pushes open a political door (like in 2009 and Obamacare) for Youngkin. Then, Manchin shifts and regains Dem cred. In the meanwhile, he & Youngkin strike some sort of WV-VA deal - most likely w/coal