In a healthy democracy Boris Johnson would by now be a former PM. The fact he's still in post - having lied to Parliament and the public last year - tells us we have a problem that goes beyond his personal qualities as a political leader, to the heart of our failing democracy.
We now know Boris Johnson and the No 10 operation either didn’t understand the lockdown rules they made, or they didn’t believe those rules applied to them.
Either of these possibilities means this PM should resign and his government fall. But they haven’t.
There has been scant empathy with the public, who largely complied with lockdown measures to protect their families and communities.
While much of the public acted in the collective interest of our country, the same can't be said of some who devised & imposed the lockdown rules.
So what now, after such serious allegations have been made about the conduct of the Prime Minister, and the update in Sue Gray’s preliminary report out today?
The power to hold the Prime Minister to account for his actions is now in the hands of the damaged institution of the Metropolitan Police - which has finally and belatedly started investigating - and Tory MPs who have the cover of the 1922 committee.
Herein lies the problem. Without a written constitution and without strong checks and balances on an increasingly powerful government committed to doing away with the weak checks already there, the institutions of our democracy will continue to be fatally undermined.
Right now, the government is using their power to make sure the public has none – whether that is through attacks on our voting system and the independence of the judiciary, or the hollowing out of the right to protest, the right to vote, citizenship rights, and our human rights.
Boris Johnson should go. But this issue goes far beyond the integrity of the PM or even his government.
Until we undergo a programme of democratic renewal, we’ll be stuck with a system that has proven itself unfit for the challenges we face now and in the coming century.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s time to challenge the Tory’s false narrative that the NHS is on its knees because of the behaviour of individuals and supposedly unforseen 'emergencies'. They’re shifting the blame away from their own role in creating a public health crisis.
The NHS is there to provide universal healthcare, and the virus is with us for the foreseeable future.
The total NHS waiting list is now 5.9m & growing. This is symptomatic of the Tory's failure to build a resilient NHS that's adapted to our new reality. thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Sajid Javid blames the unvaccinated, who he says “must really think about the damage they are doing to society.”
What about the damage done by sick pay so low it can’t be lived on, and the absence of support for workers in Rishi Sunak's Omicron package?
First, there will be no free or universal care system for the elderly and disabled. The user will pay and their assets will be liquidated in the process.
Second, that general taxation will not rise, nor will it be used to force the richest to bear the biggest burden.
I was disappointed to not be selected to speak in the debate on Afghanistan today. I served there in 2009. This doesn't makes me an expert on that country but it does - like others who’ve worked or served there - give a perspective I hoped would be useful in deliberations.
I have intense pride in the good and decent men and women I served with, both British and Afghan. Many of them paid physically and mentally for their efforts on our behalf. And of course others – too many - never returned home at all.
Unlike some that spoke today, I was never certain of the legitimacy of our precence in Afghanistan. I wanted to believe I was there for the right reasons – but it’s hard to convince yourself of that cause when you witness first-hand the human toll of your presence.
Thread: 1. I think we need to first define ‘opposition’. The problems facing @UKLabour are far more to do with existential structural factors rather than any one leader/policy, however they’re perceived. Changing the latter will not solve the former.
2. The Tories are fast becoming hegemonic. They’re also no longer the Tory party as we know but increasingly an English nationalist party. One that is south/south eastern centric and reactionary. This has implications for the acceleration of support for @theSNP & @Plaid_Cymru
3. Because of the nature of this Tory variant of English nationalism and political nationalist accelerations in Scotland & Wales - other regional movements like @FreeNorthNow or similar movements will grow as a result. Indeed they already are.
What I think he actually meant to say was, respecting party democracy, he would seek to overturn the @UKLabour policy of #FreeMovement at our next annual conference. Top down, policy by diktat rarely ends well.
It does raise the question - why do this now just before the Scottish elections? It simply helps the SNP galvanise their vote in 68% remain Scotland?
Post-Brexit it now seems increasingly clear the Scottish people have two clear choices before them: 1. Union with a declining imperial power, ruled by hard-right, neoliberal English nationalists - or (cont)
THREAD 1. Anyone who thinks English exceptionalism, nationalism and ‘regulatory realignment’ - the root drivers of Brexit - would have ended with a ‘soft brexit’ ie a customs union or a Norwegian style deal, misunderstands what brexit has always been about.
2. ‘No-deal’ has always been the logical goal for those who’ve driven the brexit agenda. The question @UKLabour should be asking the govt is, ‘what part of the ‘level playing field’ do you want to change? Food standards? Env protections? Workers rights?
3. The issue of fish, whilst playing to worst instincts of territorial jingoism is, excuse the pun, a red herring. This is about phase 2 of the neoliberal project. Building on the gains of the last 40 years.