THREAD 1. Anyone who thinks English exceptionalism, nationalism and ‘regulatory realignment’ - the root drivers of Brexit - would have ended with a ‘soft brexit’ ie a customs union or a Norwegian style deal, misunderstands what brexit has always been about.
2. ‘No-deal’ has always been the logical goal for those who’ve driven the brexit agenda. The question @UKLabour should be asking the govt is, ‘what part of the ‘level playing field’ do you want to change? Food standards? Env protections? Workers rights?
3. The issue of fish, whilst playing to worst instincts of territorial jingoism is, excuse the pun, a red herring. This is about phase 2 of the neoliberal project. Building on the gains of the last 40 years.
4. The reality for those who want to challenge this grim trajectory is to understand phase 2 will be about hollowing out what’s left of our democracy as @FisherAndrew79 eloquently argues here theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
5. The crisis of democracy, which brexit is but the latest manifestation, is what we must mobilise against. So many other issues are but symptoms of this underlying malaise.
6. To do that we have to practise and deepen a culture of democracy & tolerance of dissent in our own respective progressive political movements. This applies to @uklabour, trade unions, campaign groups.
7. It also means building alliances with as broad a range of those opposed to authoritarianism, racism and the hoarding of wealth and power that is accelerating globally.
8. If we don’t deepen our democracy and decentralise power to people and communities then as @XRebellionUK have already shown, ecological and climate destruction will prevail.
9. Brexit has always been about preventing that and enabling the already wealthy and powerful in this country to take back yet ever more control for themselves, the 1%
10. To stop that we have to win power and quickly. Deepening our democracy, the best defence against this onslaught, can not be done from opposition. Here’s how we win:
The aim of Tory govt in the 80s was to smash the postwar consensus of unionised work & the welfare state & place the “market” as the cornerstone of UK governance.Blair & Brown took this & added a layer of income redistribution to blunt its harshest effects theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I don’t agree with the above simply to ‘trash’ the @UKLabour brand. We did much good between 1997-2010. But till you understand what we got right and along with what we got wrong, our analysis will never be complete... cont
In the spirit of pluralism, diversity and generosity that I’ve promoted throughout this campaign, I’m withdrawing from the leadership contest so that those who’ve supported me can recast their nominations. cliveforleader.com/clive-lewis-mp…
For me, this election was never just about the Labour leadership but about our survival as a political movement and mapping our path to power
Whilst I’m disappointed not to have progressed further, I’m proud to have led the debate on progressive alliances, electoral reform, the crisis in democracy, democracy in our party, diversity & climate change. These issues need to be tackled head on if we are to stay relevant
1. Media asking for ‘comment’ on @IanLaveryMP article about causes of the 2019 defeat. Of course what they actually want is for me to attack him. Most MSM isnt really interested in any meaningful analysis taking place. What they want are profitable & clickable ‘row’ headlines.
2...And whilst that is in their interest it’s certainly not in ours as a party seeking to rebuild. This is going to happen a lot, to all of us. Whilst I don’t agree with everything he’s said I do agree with parts of his analysis...
3. So perhaps if all we use the coming elections as a lens through which to listen to each other, we can work out a path ahead. Because @IanLaveryMP is correct to say we face an existential crisis as a Party...
1/For many of us todays brexit decision was disappointing. But let’s take a hard, sober look at where we now find ourselves as a party. 1. Unlike a just a little while ago we are now unanimously a party that will fight and campaign for a PV... theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
2/...with Remain on the ballot. That’s something many of us would have given our right arm for last year. 2. The Kyle/Wilson amendment must now be whipped by @UKLabour inside parliament should any deal now come before parliament.
3/Any argument that @UKLabour MPs could now vote for a Johnson deal have been blown out of the water. There is now NO excuse to do so with this policy, whatsoever. That threat needs to be put to bed.
1. Lots of people asking how the @UKLabour whipping system in Parliament works. So here goes..
Whipping:
There are three levels of whip and they have two functions - attendance and vote direction.
2. One line whip:This is the weakest of the three. It implies you don’t have to be on the parliamentary estate. If there are votes you are briefed which way the front bench is directing the PLP to vote.But the fact attendance is optional, it’s not considered a critical vote.
3. Nonetheless technically it’s still a disciplinary matter to break the whip. By imposing a one line whip on a controversial issue it could be claimed you are in effect giving tacit sanction to abstain/avoid the vote without recrimination.