Don Moynihan Profile picture
Jan 31 6 tweets 2 min read
Part of a consistent pattern by a public Texas institution to violate the first amendment by threatening and then firing faculty for exercising protected speech rights. But it doesn't make a dent in the broader discourse because it doesn't fit a very specific narrative. 1/
This history professor says he was fired from their university after they visibly advocated for the removal of confederate statutes and criticized the absence of public health messaging on campus. 2/ Image
Couple of points here. This is at least the fourth prof removed in similar circumstances by this college. The last one won a settlement. But the institution just keeps on doing it. Sometimes, a fine is just a price for misbehavior, not a disincentive. 3/ lawandcrime.com/first-amendmen…
This college can create an atmosphere where faculty know they can be fired for speech because it does not have tenure. That is why a) attacks on tenure are attacks on speech protections, and b) why adjunct faculty are especially vulnerable to efforts to shut down speech. 4/
It seems to be possible to activate a free speech coalition to come defend you, but only under certain circumstances, which often involves speech that creates offense among historically marginalized population at fancy institutions. Being critical of power isn't enough. 5/
The coalition there to defend someone on paid leave* for remarks that will reasonably raise concerns among students of color will be mostly marked absent when a Texas professor is fired b/c of fairly mundane speech on health and race.
*He won't be fired, and shouldn't be IMO. 6/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Don Moynihan

Don Moynihan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @donmoyn

Feb 3
Here, Douthat offers what is intended to be a parody of liberal reliance on expertise and autonomy. Instead, it is a parody of Douthatism: the tendency to waive away the excesses of radical right and equate them as equivalently dangerous the basic aspects of running a democracy. Image
Douthat: Trump attempting a coup and managing to create massive distrust in US elections is not good, no, but it's complicated. Cast in a certain light it reflects intellectual traditions on the right.
Also Douthat: Now let me tell you about the dangers of schoolteachers. Image
There is so much in this single paragraph that it falls apart on the slightest inspection. Did Fauci "lead" pandemic decision making? No, the President does, and is free to discard Fauci's adivce.
Better ?: would we have been better off granting Trump the power to fire Fauci? No. Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2
Lisa Cook's work documenting how a collapse in Black personal security dramatically undermined innovation is amazing. It speaks to the value that an empirical approach and different perspective provides a deeper understand of the economy. paulromer.net/lisa-cook/ ImageImage
What struck me looking that Cook's graph documenting a Reconstruction-era spike and Jim Crow era collapse in Black patents, is you see the same pattern in political participation (graph on the right documents voter registration in Louisiana, from Keele, Cubbison, and White, 2021) ImageImage
This historical data had to be painstakingly assembled to provide a broader picture of US history. They speak to the enormous long-term costs of the abandonment of Reconstruction in terms of not just equality but human innovation and prosperity.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
Started my morning doing a zoom panel hosted by the OECD presenting research about US government performance improvement reforms to a group of international finance officials. What I didn’t mention is that Congress is no longer sharing the data that the research is based on.🧵
Bit more background. Every few years the GAO surveys federal employees about how they use performance data in government. Here is an example of a report based on those surveys. 2/ gao.gov/products/gao-2…
I have used that survey data to understand what sorts of factors make it more likely that public employees use performance data, and how they use it. The resulting studies provide insights into US government, and specific variables like the effects of ideology or training. 3/ ImageImageImageImage
Read 12 tweets
Jan 26
TN county school board votes to remove use of graphic novel about the Holocaust, Maus from school curriculum. Complains about vulgarity and naked pictures. tnholler.com/2022/01/mcminn…
All I’m suggesting folks is that maybe it’s a good thing if the professional autonomy of teachers was respected a little more
We don't know a lot about the details of the removal of the book Maus, but since the anti-CRT push we've seen a) a 60%⬆️in effort to bans books, and b) the election of school board members who are less likely to accept the judgement of education officials. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-book-ban…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 26
Looking forward to the guys who floated the theory that a Kavanaugh doppelgänger attacked Christine Blasey Ford and she just misremembered the whole thing now turn their attention to questioning the credentials and temperament of Black female candidates
People sort of memory-holed this, but the nuts Kavanaugh doppelgänger theory was given credence by NY Times columnists, and became the means by which Senators who said they didn't think Ford was lying could still vote for Kavanaugh vox.com/2018/10/1/1791…
If I had promoted a wild conspiracy theory designed to protect a SCOTUS nominee from credible allegations of assault, I would simply stop weighing in on SCOTUS nominations for the rest of my life.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
People laughed about the Stephen Douglas/Frederick Douglas mistake, but this bill is really bad. The key goal is to silence, discredit, and put a bounty on teachers, while further undermining the attack on public schools. 1/
The bill has the standard blocking of "divisive concepts." In other words, you can't suggest structural racism is a real and persistent force in America, despite evidence of this point. Doesn't matter if it's true as long as it's "divisive." 2/
It also blocks teachers from talking about current events that might be controversial, that is, the news. If for any reason they do, they have to present both sides. 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(