Started my morning doing a zoom panel hosted by the OECD presenting research about US government performance improvement reforms to a group of international finance officials. What I didn’t mention is that Congress is no longer sharing the data that the research is based on.🧵
Bit more background. Every few years the GAO surveys federal employees about how they use performance data in government. Here is an example of a report based on those surveys. 2/ gao.gov/products/gao-2…
I have used that survey data to understand what sorts of factors make it more likely that public employees use performance data, and how they use it. The resulting studies provide insights into US government, and specific variables like the effects of ideology or training. 3/
My research based on this GAO data did not just generate papers, it was also used by policymakers. It was cited in a couple of President Obama's budget proposals, and is included in current OMB guidance to agencies about how to do their performance reporting. 4/
The same research has been used in World Bank and OECD reports, and when the Trump administration tried to gut performance reporting by federal agencies was the basis of advocacy to stop them (which the Biden Administration ultimately did). 5/ govexec.com/management/202…
GAO is part of Congress, and Congress is not covered by FOIA. So to request the data, which goes back to the 1990s, I would email the GAO after every new survey, and seek a de-identified version, which they would provide. Until this year. Response letter below. 6/
When I asked GAO why they would no longer share data that was previously released and had generated lots of good research I was told only that "We reached out to the committees of jurisdiction and were not authorized to release the data for this report." 7/ @HSGAC@OversightDems
I could try to replicate the research myself, but apart from the expense and effort, outsiders surveying federal employees get less than a 20% response rate, about a third of the response rate when the government itself administers the survey. 8/
Unless something changes this will be pretty much the end of the road for me doing this research on US federal government performance, and it's unlikely anyone else will step in. Its not a trivial loss for the community who is interested in empirical evidence about this topic. 9/
Politicians say they want academics to work on real-world problems but its not uncommon for them to refuse to share data when we try to. The committees of jurisdiction presumably have some interest in research on the topics they oversee, but are shutting down that research. 10/
If anyone has suggestions, insights, feedback (or friends on the committee staff!) would welcome that. In the meantime, I will move on to other research areas. 11/ @GOPoversight@OversightDems
So I don't sound too bitter, want to say thanks to @USGAO and @OMBPress staff who valued this research and made it part of the policymaking conversation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here, Douthat offers what is intended to be a parody of liberal reliance on expertise and autonomy. Instead, it is a parody of Douthatism: the tendency to waive away the excesses of radical right and equate them as equivalently dangerous the basic aspects of running a democracy.
Douthat: Trump attempting a coup and managing to create massive distrust in US elections is not good, no, but it's complicated. Cast in a certain light it reflects intellectual traditions on the right.
Also Douthat: Now let me tell you about the dangers of schoolteachers.
There is so much in this single paragraph that it falls apart on the slightest inspection. Did Fauci "lead" pandemic decision making? No, the President does, and is free to discard Fauci's adivce.
Better ?: would we have been better off granting Trump the power to fire Fauci? No.
Lisa Cook's work documenting how a collapse in Black personal security dramatically undermined innovation is amazing. It speaks to the value that an empirical approach and different perspective provides a deeper understand of the economy. paulromer.net/lisa-cook/
What struck me looking that Cook's graph documenting a Reconstruction-era spike and Jim Crow era collapse in Black patents, is you see the same pattern in political participation (graph on the right documents voter registration in Louisiana, from Keele, Cubbison, and White, 2021)
This historical data had to be painstakingly assembled to provide a broader picture of US history. They speak to the enormous long-term costs of the abandonment of Reconstruction in terms of not just equality but human innovation and prosperity.
Part of a consistent pattern by a public Texas institution to violate the first amendment by threatening and then firing faculty for exercising protected speech rights. But it doesn't make a dent in the broader discourse because it doesn't fit a very specific narrative. 1/
This history professor says he was fired from their university after they visibly advocated for the removal of confederate statutes and criticized the absence of public health messaging on campus. 2/
Couple of points here. This is at least the fourth prof removed in similar circumstances by this college. The last one won a settlement. But the institution just keeps on doing it. Sometimes, a fine is just a price for misbehavior, not a disincentive. 3/ lawandcrime.com/first-amendmen…
TN county school board votes to remove use of graphic novel about the Holocaust, Maus from school curriculum. Complains about vulgarity and naked pictures. tnholler.com/2022/01/mcminn…
All I’m suggesting folks is that maybe it’s a good thing if the professional autonomy of teachers was respected a little more
We don't know a lot about the details of the removal of the book Maus, but since the anti-CRT push we've seen a) a 60%⬆️in effort to bans books, and b) the election of school board members who are less likely to accept the judgement of education officials. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-book-ban…
Looking forward to the guys who floated the theory that a Kavanaugh doppelgänger attacked Christine Blasey Ford and she just misremembered the whole thing now turn their attention to questioning the credentials and temperament of Black female candidates
People sort of memory-holed this, but the nuts Kavanaugh doppelgänger theory was given credence by NY Times columnists, and became the means by which Senators who said they didn't think Ford was lying could still vote for Kavanaugh vox.com/2018/10/1/1791…
If I had promoted a wild conspiracy theory designed to protect a SCOTUS nominee from credible allegations of assault, I would simply stop weighing in on SCOTUS nominations for the rest of my life.
People laughed about the Stephen Douglas/Frederick Douglas mistake, but this bill is really bad. The key goal is to silence, discredit, and put a bounty on teachers, while further undermining the attack on public schools. 1/
The bill has the standard blocking of "divisive concepts." In other words, you can't suggest structural racism is a real and persistent force in America, despite evidence of this point. Doesn't matter if it's true as long as it's "divisive." 2/
It also blocks teachers from talking about current events that might be controversial, that is, the news. If for any reason they do, they have to present both sides. 3/