Trump ripped up presidential records
"well into the latter stages of his presidency"
Which is unlawful when you're sitting in the Oval
Records management analysts taped them back together
J6 committee has them
No wonder he's so scared!
Thread washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01…
2/"When [NARA] handed over a trove of documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, some of the Trump White House records had been ripped up and then taped back together, according to three people familiar with the records.
3/"Trump was known inside the White House for his unusual and potentially unlawful habit of tearing presidential records into shreds and tossing them on the floor —
4/"creating a headache for records management analysts who meticulously used Scotch tape to piece together fragments of paper that were sometimes as small as confetti, as Politico reported in 2018.
5/"But despite the Presidential Records Act — which requires the preservation of memos, letters, notes, emails, faxes and other written communications related to a president’s official duties —
6/"the former president’s infrangible shredding practices apparently continued well into the latter stages of his presidency.
7/"[NARA] took the unusual step of confirming the habit, saying in a statement that records turned over from the Trump White House “included paper records that had been torn up by former President Trump."
8/"In its statement, [NARA] said that “White House records management officials during the Trump Administration recovered and taped together some of the torn-up records.
9/"These were turned over to the National Archives at the end of the Trump Administration, along with a number of torn-up records that had not been reconstructed by the White House.
10/"The Presidential Records Act requires that all records created by presidents be turned over to the National Archives at the end of their administrations.”
11/"It’s unclear what documents in the tranche delivered to the Jan. 6 committee were damaged. But legal records indicate that the documents over which Trump sought to assert privilege included presidential diaries, schedules, appointment information,
12/"handwritten notes concerning the events of Jan. 6 from White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, speeches, remarks, and more.
13/"Trump also sought to assert privilege over four pages from the records of presidential findings concerning the security of the 2020 election, four pages of a draft Executive Order on the topic of election integrity,
14/"three pages of talking points on alleged election irregularities and two pages of a draft text of a presidential speech for the Jan. 6, 2021, 'Save America March.'" ~excerpts WaPo
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WOW!
NEW Per NYT:
Trump told Giuliani to call DHS re seizing machines in swing states
Giuliani did it
They're getting closer to actual proof
every. single. day!
Thread: nytimes.com/2022/01/31/us/…
2/"Six weeks after Election Day, with his hold on power slipping, President Donald J. Trump directed his lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, to make a remarkable call. Mr. Trump wanted him to ask the Department of Homeland Security if it could legally take control of voting machines
3/"in key swing states, three people familiar with the matter said. Giuliani did so, calling the department’s acting deputy secretary, who said he lacked the authority to audit or impound the machines.
Growing chatter that -at McConnell's behest- a bipart gp of Senators will propose Electoral Count Act (ECA) reform
Giving Manchin cover
& avoiding filibuster reform & passage of actual voting rights
ECA is *very* narrow
It won't fix what GOP are doing in states
Not good
⤵️
ECA is a relatively arcane 19th Century law that governs how Electoral College votes are tabulated & certified
-which is what Trump tried to get Pence to corrupt on 1/6
Has *nothing* to do with state level issues at the core of voter suppression & a lot more that vrl covers
⤵️
Make no mistake:
Manchin said yesterday he is only in favor of making minor filibuster change
And he wants 2/3 (GOP) agreement to make the change
He's obfuscating again
This ECA thing is McConnell throwing Manchin a bone
And it's very, VERY dangerous
⤵️
Per Daily Beast:
Peter Navarro's new book:
Bannon coordinated w/ over a HUNDRED Republican MOC & Bannon on a "hail Mary" attempt to stop Biden cert
Called the mission "the Green Bay sweep"
He names Gosar & CRUZ as officials who spearheaded this
READ THIS! thedailybeast.com/trump-advisor-…
2/"'We spent a lot of time lining up over 100 congressmen, including some senators. It started out perfectly. At 1 p.m., Gosar and Cruz did exactly what was expected of them,' Navarro told the Beast.
3/"'It was a perfect plan. And it all predicated on peace and calm on Capitol Hill. We didn’t even need any protestors, because we had over 100 congressmen committed to it.'
Jen Psaki today on what Biden's phone call with Manchin will be:
“The president looks forward to speaking directly with Sen. Manchin and making the case for why the president feels this legislation should move forward.
⤵️
"He feels that their conversations have always operated in good faith, and he expects this to follow that same approach.
⤵️
"I would note that Sen. Manchin has been in touch over the course of the last several weeks closely with senior members of the White House staff and we expect this just to be a continuation of that conversation.”
More from WaPo on the power point Meadows gave to J6:
Waldron, who was circulating it says he met with Meadows at the WH "on multiple occasions"
Also: Graham, Giuliani & Eastman
And this presentation is complete blueprint for overthrowing the Gov't
Thread: washingtonpost.com/investigations…
2/"[Waldron] said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
3/"Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,”
Jovan Pulitzer was involved in the power point Mark Meadows gave to J6
Looks like Pulitzer & Phil Waldron are the original pushers of the China/Venezuela theory
Despite denials it looks like this is their work
And Meadows 'help' went DEEP
(thread): nytimes.com/2021/12/10/us/…
2/".. appears to be based on the theories of Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, a Texas entrepreneur and self-described inventor who has appeared with Mr. Waldron on podcasts discussing election fraud.
3/".. On Jan. 4, members of Mr. Waldron’s team-he did not identify them-spoke to a group of senators and briefed them on the allegations of supposed election fraud contained in the PowerPoint, Mr. Waldron said.