Jen Psaki today on what Biden's phone call with Manchin will be:
“The president looks forward to speaking directly with Sen. Manchin and making the case for why the president feels this legislation should move forward.
⤵️
"He feels that their conversations have always operated in good faith, and he expects this to follow that same approach.
⤵️
"I would note that Sen. Manchin has been in touch over the course of the last several weeks closely with senior members of the White House staff and we expect this just to be a continuation of that conversation.”
On negotiations:
“I will let [Manchin] speak for himself and again the president looks forward to communicating directly with him this afternoon…I wouldn't see this as a negotiating table as much as a conversation between two people
⤵️
"who have been in public life for some time and have had good faith discussions directly, and this is just a continuation of that.”
Re Manchin's inflation "concerns":
⤵️
“It's not just us, a range of economists, 17 Nobel laureates who have conveyed this will help address inflation over the long term… It's about how we lower costs for the American people … this Build Back Better plan will help lower costs for people across the country.
⤵️
"That is fundamentally what it will do, so we will continue to make that case publicly and privately to Sen. Manchin as well."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More from WaPo on the power point Meadows gave to J6:
Waldron, who was circulating it says he met with Meadows at the WH "on multiple occasions"
Also: Graham, Giuliani & Eastman
And this presentation is complete blueprint for overthrowing the Gov't
Thread: washingtonpost.com/investigations…
2/"[Waldron] said that he visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoke with President Donald Trump’s chief of staff “maybe eight to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on the eve of the Jan. 6 riot.
3/"Phil Waldron, the retired colonel, was working with Trump’s outside lawyers and was part of a team that briefed the lawmakers on a PowerPoint presentation detailing “Options for 6 JAN,”
Jovan Pulitzer was involved in the power point Mark Meadows gave to J6
Looks like Pulitzer & Phil Waldron are the original pushers of the China/Venezuela theory
Despite denials it looks like this is their work
And Meadows 'help' went DEEP
(thread): nytimes.com/2021/12/10/us/…
2/".. appears to be based on the theories of Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, a Texas entrepreneur and self-described inventor who has appeared with Mr. Waldron on podcasts discussing election fraud.
3/".. On Jan. 4, members of Mr. Waldron’s team-he did not identify them-spoke to a group of senators and briefed them on the allegations of supposed election fraud contained in the PowerPoint, Mr. Waldron said.
Surprise!
Per WaPo:
Sidney Powell is under federal investigation
A September grand jury subpoena sought records dating back to 11/20
This fed'l prosecutor is also handling J6 matters & Bannon's charges
Thread: washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
2/"Federal prosecutors have demanded the financial records of multiple fundraising organizations launched by attorney Sidney Powell after the 2020 election as part of a criminal investigation, according to a subpoena reviewed by The Washington Post.
3/"The grand jury subpoena, issued in September by the U.S. attorney’s office for the District of Columbia, sought communications and other records related to fundraising and accounting by groups including Defending the Republic,
Good Morning..hope you all had a great holiday weekend
Because..
Gov't funding runs out on Friday
New Gov't spending CR must be passed by midnight 12/3 (no one expects a shutdown, but..)
And...
Debt limit deadline 12/15
NDAA
BBB
Brace yourselves:
December will be insane
2/Re NDAA:
Schumer expects to push it thru the Senate without too much trouble
The issue will be GOP amendments
Before Thanksgiving he tried to get a bipartisan agmnt to limit them and at the last minute it fell thru
3/Re Debt ceiling:
Per Yellen gov't will default by 12/15 if this is not resolved
Tho McConnell still doesn't want Dems to use a reconciliation fix he & Schumer appear to be slightly more agreeable about getting it done
Some House chatter @ getting rid of it altogether
We'll see
ICYMI:
Yesterday DC Court of Appeals asked lawyers for Trump, J6 & NARA to prep to argue whether the courts even have the jurisdiction to hear this case
Hearing is Monday
NOT looking good for Trump
Here: nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
2/"[Appeals court] raised the question on its own, meaning it was not suggested by the lawyers in the case.
3/"It asked: "Does the provision in the Presidential Records Act providing that the Archivist’s 'determination whether access to a Presidential record ... shall be restricted ... shall not be subject to judicial review, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section'
Big deal?
The Manhattan DA's office has convened a new grand jury
Tish James is considering a new law suit against Trump
Cy Vance is retiring next month
Is *this* how newly elected Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg will finally be able to criminally indict Trump? washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
2/"'This is way, way beyond anything that’s believable,' said Norm Miller, a professor of real estate finance at the University of San Diego who has appraised properties for 50 years. “I’ve never seen anything with a gap that extreme.”
3/"But extreme is not the same as illegal. Legal experts said that if prosecutors wish to prove a crime, they will need to do more than simply prove Trump’s valuations were wrong.