1/ This dude said in his godawful Matthew Shepard episode of You're Wrong About that people who care about the actual truth of what happened in situations like that killing or Michael Brown's (regarding whether he had his hands up) are missing the point because concerns with the
2/ actual facts could distract people from Deeper Truths and/or provide succor to political conservatives. He is on record saying that whether we should fact-check or fight misinformation depends wholly on who benefits from a given claim. The high horse is unwarranted.
3/ Hobbes' argument is structured similarly to Jeet's. It turns out that yes, *technically* plenty of people in our tribe also spread misinformation but you see we've decided that that's not as bad for [reasons], so there shouldn't be a clampdown.
4/ "Has Glenn Greenwald ever done anything to advance liberal interests or ideals?"
Good stuff
My bad for getting sucked back into this, let alone checking his feed -- I still need better internet
5/ There's more of this here with Gay's piece. There's this sense of these folks coming to some sort of careful, reasoned conclusion that Joe Rogan's misinformation is so bad it warrants action, and I feel like you just have to ignore SO MUCH to get there
1/ Blocked so can't reply directly but it was a specific choice on the part of the activist groups to pathologize the idea that people have an original biological sex, to treat this as some sort of forbidden knowledge that can't be uttered aloud. This was always an insane...
2/ ...decision because people understand what sex is and what the answers to questions like Hawley's are. Activists -- not, by any means, all or even most trans people -- have ignored, like, a decade's worth of feedback on their chosen framing. It failed completely. This is...
3/ ...partly a class thing. The people who believe the weirdest versions of Butlerian gender theory and its offshoots tend to be highly educated and enmeshed in progressive circles. The activist/consultant class. If you talk to just normal trans people, they themselves have...
Lot going on in the world so it's mportant to stay updated about BlueSky:
Someone replies to the CEO demanding for the 500000th time I be banned (HIPPO), CEO makes the grave error of responding jokingly instead of with the seriousness the situation warrants, it doesn't go well
2/ These people have created a world in which they relentlessly harass and dox and death-threat anyone they dislike enough while simultaneously convincing themselves that all the stuff they do to other people is being done to them. It's truly an asylum
3/ The folks running Bluesky appear to have had enough. They've been getting screamed at, nonstop, by some of the angriest and most unhappy people on the internet for almost a year and it has to just get brain-breaking
1/ After Jordan Neely randomly punched a 67-year-old woman in the face, which led to one of his three dozen or so arrests, several for assault, he spent 15 months in jail, max. Then The Helpers arrived(!), leading to "a carefully planned strategy between the city and his lawyers to allow him to get treatment and stay out of prison."
2/ The traumatized, violent, deeply mentally ill guy got to do basically an honor-code type of deal where he sorta pinky-swore to stay in treatment. But 13 days later he just walked out (because of course he did!).
3/ Then outreach workers saw him on the subway. They approached him and he started pissing in front of them. They called the cops, who didn't bother to check if he had a warrant out -- they just shooed him off the train. Three weeks later he was killed.
[con't] There's a consistent error American liberals make, which is that it will be ~obvious~ to persuadable American voters that Trump is beyond the pale, that he is steamrolling important norms. Voters don't see it that way! They see both sides endlessly screaming.
[con't] Persuadable voter is going to land on something like "Maybe Trump made some cuts he shouldn't have, but weren't the Dems also bad on covid? And what about that weird gender stuff?" You gotta meet voters where they're at not pretend there's *nothing* to Jennings' argument
3/ Gordon Guyatt and Romina Brignardello-Petersen emailed the authors of all five systematic reviews McMaster worked on w/SEGM and proposed inserting language about bans being "unconscionable." As Guyatt admitted to me, this is very unusual language for a systematic review.
"No one can invest significantly in the U.S. if they have no idea what the policy is going to be from day to day" is a concept that understandable by a bright 6-year-old. There's really *no one* left in Trump's orbit with *any* power to deter him from this garbage?
2/ None of this is even internally consistent. He will reward other countries just for *calling* us, regardless of what was said or how productive the conversation was? The man has no idea how to negotiate.
3/
1. announce tariffs, wiping out trillions
2. temporarily *partially* suspend *some* of them because some countries... called
3. retain huge tariffs on largest producer in world
4. *all of this is* re-re-reversible at *any* point, for *any* reason, if DJT feels like it