Sex is *observed* at birth by “reading” external genitalia, which is a remarkably sensitive marker of sex. Sex is also now routinely observed in utero, again by “reading” external genitalia and, increasingly, by DNA analysis.
@RealTayChaTLC The definition of female is: of or denoting the sex that can produce large gametes.
This not a matter of *observation*, this is a matter of *definition*.
@RealTayChaTLC Very few animals and no plants menstruate, yet females exist across almost all complex life.
We do not become men at menopause. We certainly don’t “revert” to men, which implies we were men at some point before menopause. Maybe you think we are men before menstruation?
@RealTayChaTLC Sharron Davies is female. That means she is of the sex that can produce large gametes. Putting a penis on her won’t change that.
A man who loses his penis remains of the sex that can produce small gametes. That is, male.
@RealTayChaTLC We may not look between our legs to know *who* we are, but what’s there tells us an awful lot about an important aspect of our lives.
The position that it is not fair for TW to compete with and against females in sports is not based on winning (or not).
@RealTayChaTLC Feminism is about female liberation from patriarchy. It is for females.
I don’t think TW are predators. I think some males, under a selfID model, will pretend to be trans to access female spaces for various reasons.
@RealTayChaTLC I will repeat. Sex is observed at birth (and often in utero). Changing external genitals does not change one’s sex. You should review your definition of female ASAP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Across the natural world, male and female are defined by reproductive function, describing the contribution of small gametes (like sperm) or large gametes (like ova), respectively, to the next generation.
In healthy humans, there are two anatomical body types, each corresponding to one of the two reproductive functions. That is, in humans, there are two sexes.
In utero, males and females develop sex-specific primary characteristics pertinent to function during reproduction.
Healthy male anatomy comprises testicles, internal genital structures like the vas deferens and an external penis and scrotum.
Here is a graphic of changes in muscle and strength in transwomen pre- and post- testosterone suppression (12+ months), compared with baseline metrics from demographically matched females.
The original data is presented in Hilton and Lundberg, 2021 (Table 4).
The graphic was created by me for a policy paper I coauthored with Professor Jon Pike @runthinkwrite and Professor Leslie Howe @usask for the Canadian think tank The MacDonald Laurier Institute.
I recently tweeted about people who think I believe humans are asparagus.
This bad faith take stems (ha ha) from an analogy I’ve used to illustrate that the phenomenon of male/female is not limited to the constructions of the human brain.
Like many plants, and like humans, (some) asparagus strains are dioecious - they exist as individuals male and individual female plants. In animals, we call this set up ‘gonochorism’.
Asparagus can reproduce via the fusion of one small and one large gamete (sometimes, they reproduce asexually).
Biological convention denotes the plant morph producing the large gamete, found in the ovules, as ‘female’.
Systematic differences between the two sexes of a gonochoristic species of a physical characteristic (or set thereof), not including reproductive anatomy.
Some sexually dimorphic characteristics are non-overlapping (e.g. deer antlers) while some are very overlapping (e.g. human height).
The extent of overlapping observation/measurement is irrelevant. The only requirement is a robustly-detectable difference between sexes.
Many female humans are taller than many male humans, yet the population descriptions of height in humans consistently reveal that males as a sex class are taller than their demographically-matched female peers.
Height in humans is a sexually dimorphic characteristic.
@xandvt@MumpGorithm@refined_devon@BBCMorningLive@BBCiPlayer I am honestly appalled by your behaviour here. You are a medic and a public communicator, and you seem unable to use basic and commonly-understood words when discussing concepts like population health screens.
@xandvt@MumpGorithm@refined_devon@BBCMorningLive@BBCiPlayer The WHO make it clear that an ethical population screen uses clear language that will maximise capture of the target demographic. Who are the target demographic for prostate screens?
@xandvt@MumpGorithm@refined_devon@BBCMorningLive@BBCiPlayer To define the population demographic for prostate screening as ‘those with prostates’ lacks any explanatory value. It’s a linguistic dead end. Replace ‘prostate’ with a less well-known structure, and then consider how effective a screening campaign will be….
First, there is the stuff about how to classify CAIS and there is discussion within this thread about the dev bio, endocrinonlogy etc.
@WackyPidgeon@JamesVSD1@zaelefty@JuliaMasonMD1@madadhruadh@hoovlet I have never hidden my developmental biology understanding of sex, which is centred not on chromosomes (or any other determination mechanism) but on gamete type, which is in animals a product of gonad type.