@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer I am honestly appalled by your behaviour here. You are a medic and a public communicator, and you seem unable to use basic and commonly-understood words when discussing concepts like population health screens.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer The WHO make it clear that an ethical population screen uses clear language that will maximise capture of the target demographic. Who are the target demographic for prostate screens?
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer To define the population demographic for prostate screening as ‘those with prostates’ lacks any explanatory value. It’s a linguistic dead end. Replace ‘prostate’ with a less well-known structure, and then consider how effective a screening campaign will be….
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer Or consider the premise of identifying an at risk group defined as being as ‘those at risk’. You’re not identifying any group, you’re just repeating yourself.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer You are privileged to know what a prostate is, as am I. I know that I am incredibly unlikely to need prostate screening, while my husband will. We know that because we’ve been educated about such things.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer Remember that education? What if a teacher had taught us that the people who have prostates are the people who have prostates.

You want the teachers to say the words ‘male’ and ‘boy/man’ while you keep your social media hands clean.

And fail to advocate effectively for men.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer What specifically about my GP registration will flag me for a prostate exam/screen? What’s the relevant data field? Nobody has ever looked to check if I have one.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer My husband is a man. He is male. He was born with a male reproductive system. And that data field - sex: male - is how his GP knows to get him in for prostate screening.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer You know this, yet you are too worried to say it. And in refusing to say it, even laughably pretending you don’t understand the questions being asked of you, you are failing to do your job.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer So I’ll do it for you.

Attention men, males, those with male reproductive systems:

You should consider prostate screening when the time comes, because it is men, males, those with a male reproductive systems that have prostates.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer Attention women, females, those with female reproductive systems:

You will not need prostate screening. But please consider taking up cervix screening services when offered.
@xandvt @MumpGorithm @refined_devon @BBCMorningLive @BBCiPlayer Please see here for guidelines from the WHO about how to run an effective screening service, in this example for cervical screening.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emma Hilton

Emma Hilton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FondOfBeetles

4 Jan
@tomhfh Tom. Promise me you will never teach statistics.

The graph you have posted clearly shows two overlapping normal distributions.

Each normal distribution is associated with either the female sex or the male sex.
@tomhfh As you correctly point out, short males are not female.

Yet a very short male may appear in the little area of overlap highlighted, because they are at the far left of the male normal distribution, not because they are magically ‘intersex’ or ‘a bit female’.
@tomhfh The X axis in the graph is not ‘sex units’. The graph is not mapping sex. It is a mapping schematically a characteristic associated with sex, like testosterone levels (in some concentration unit).

Sex is why you have a bimodal distribution of testosterone levels.
Read 11 tweets
22 Dec 21
My husband is laughing at me talking about Lennon’s death.

Turns out I got this very wrong.

What happened and was there there a sniper?
To explain, despite being a fan of the Beatles, I have never given thought to check out Lennon’s murder (and too young to remember it).

For some reason, perhaps too much Day Of The Jackal, I thought he was shot at long range by a sniper while…
…(and I can’t believe I’m about to type this)…while he was boating on that lake in Central Park. 😂

A lake I’ve visited 🤦‍♀️
Read 4 tweets
15 Dec 21
On staggered starts as a means of correcting for advantage. Thoughts for discussion.
Grevenberg has proposed that advantage carried by transwomen into female categories of sport might be corrected by means of ‘staggered starts’. Taking a broad view, we’ll assume this means some kind of handicap applied to transwomen.
Usain Bolt’s 100m WR average speed was 10.44 metres per second. FloJo’s was 9.53 metres per second.

We could, on these stats, create a dead heat between the two by starting Bolt 109.52m from the finish (FloJo at 100m) or starting him 0.91 seconds later than FloJo.
Read 14 tweets
5 Dec 21
These are sexes.

There are two. They are called ‘female’ and ‘male’, and those words refer large (eggs, ovules) or small (sperm, pollen) gametes, respectively.
These are body plans.

There are many ways the two sexes are organised in individuals, separately or together, immutable or not, time-dependent.
These are (a small set of examples of) sexual systems.

There are many ways the various body plans are organised in species.
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec 21
This is interesting. Revealing, but AL doesn’t realise it.

AL assumes something has shifted for women, captured by the US right etc.

AL doesn’t consider that something has shifted in what women have been asked to accept.
We *have* been using toilets and so forth with transwomen for decades. Maybe some we clock, and no idea how many we don't (because we don't).
It was a social contract - a compromise - for a *specific demographic* who were either completely undetectable as male, or for whom we rarely encountered but for whom we, presumably understanding male violence, shared refuge.
Read 7 tweets
1 Dec 21
This is a 200 yard freestyle analysis of Lia Thomas, a transgender woman and US college swimmer. Lia began transition last (Covid-cancelled) season, having competed in male competition for the three previous years.
Pre-transition, Lia's PB was 0.21s off the NCAA female record for the 200 yard free, set in 2015 by 5 time Olympic gold medalist Missy Franklin.

Lia's most recent time is -4.2% slower than the pre-transition PB.
Lia's winning margin in the race was +5.6%. The times for the remainder of the field clustered within 5.5% of eachother.

That is, Lia was (very) slightly further ahead of Bridget O'Leary in P2 than O'Leary was to the slowest finisher.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(