Today 1 February is the anniversary of the Skirmish at Bender when in 1713 around 600 Ottomans attacked Swedish King Charles XII protected by around 40 soldiers. Why did the Ottomans attack the Swedish King so far away from his home in modern-day Moldavia? I explain... (thread)
After the battle of Poltava in 1709 where the Russians defeated the Swedish, Swedish King Charles XII fled to the Ottoman Empire, an enemy of Russia. He would spend the next 4 years in the Ottoman lands!
The Swedish King was initially well accepted and settled in Bender, an Ottoman-controlled town in modern-day Moldavia which had a fortress.
There the Swedes set up their camp. From the comfort of this camp, Charles XII was convincing the Ottomans to attack Russia and involved himself in the Ottoman politics. However this also brought him enemies.
Many Ottomans were beginning to get tired of him including the people of Bender where Charles' entourage accumulated debts! The Ottomans started seeing him as a burden. They decided to capture him which led to this skirmish of Bender.
However the skirmish proved very difficult for the Ottomans. Despite outnumbering the Swedish 600 to 40, the fighting lasted for 7 hours. The Swedes were well equipped and experienced veterans, and the Ottomans' plan to capture Charles XII alive also hindered them somewhat.
Charles XII himself killed one of the Turkish soldiers with a sword, and was shooting at them from his sleeping quarters! After futile assaults, the Ottomans wisely started using fire arrows to set the roof of the building on fire and force the Swedes to come out!
Charles XII was captured after he tripped on his own spurs during escape. He would be kept a prisoner in Constantinople where he would play chess and study the Ottoman navy until he returned to Sweden in autumn the same year.
This skirmish at Bender is also called "kalabalik" from the Turkish word meaning crowd. Because of this skirmish this word entered Swedish language meaning disorder, riot or chaos!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's crazy how Americans bought the myth that during the time of Columbus people thought that the earth was flat, a complete lie popularized by quasi-historian Washington Irving in 1828.
This globe was literally made before Columbus' discovery, and has no America on it.
Washington Irving completely invented a fictional dialogue between Columbus and the Council of Salamanca, where the clergy supposedly objected him on the ground that the earth was flat.
His fraudulent book would become the most popular book on Columbus in English-speaking world.
This lie was then picked on in America and expended as some sort of anti-Catholic anti-medieval founding myth, where Columbus was supposedly representing enlightenment rationalism against irrationality and dogmatism of the Church.
The idea that monarchy and republic are opposed to each other is a modern thing.
The term republic (res publica) was often used to describe medieval kingdoms.
Even by 16th century the Kingdom of France was still called both a republic and a monarchy at the same time!
The Kingdom of France defined itself by the phrase of "chose publique" (res publica) from 1350s to 1580s, also using the word respublique, to describe the relation between the King of France and his subject.
The term was then replaced by State (État).
The absolutist French monarchy which emerged in 17th century preferred the term State over republic, and talked of the "good of the State".
However the term state also comes from earlier medieval concepts like status regis at regni (the state of the king and the kingdom).
16th century Romans developed an interesting tradition of "talking statues", attaching anonymous political commentary on statues.
The Pasquino was the first of such statues.🧵
The Pasquino is an old statue in Rome dating back to Antiquity.
It was one of many random statues in Rome until early 16th century when Cardinal Oliveiro Carafa decorated the statue with Latin epigrams on the occasion of the Feast of Saint Mark.
The Cardinal's actions unintentionally inspired ordinary Roman people to start writing satirical poems and attaching them to the Pasquino.
It is speculated that these were first only consisting of lowbrow humor, but they soon began including controversial political criticism!