There’s a HUGE lawsuit underway at @ConsenSys no one is talking about. An it reads like a National Enquirer piece 🧵
1/10
@KavitaGupta19 was a general partner at ConsenSys alongside @ethereumJoseph. She managed a fund from $13.5 million to over $300 million from 2017 to 2019, until she resigned to teach at Stanford.
2/10
Two years later she’s asking for the carry she’s entitled to (20% of profits or ~$50 million).
Problem? Lubin won’t pay.
3/10
In a new lawsuit from last month, Gupta alleges Lubin won't pay so he can keep the carry. As the other GP, he would be entitled to the profits (and not ConsenSys).
Gupta further alleges that she left ConsenSys after numerous cases of “misogyny,” “hard drug use,” and "illegal payments.” She didn't want to leave. She had to, and shouldn't be penalized for it.
5/10
But what does Lubin and ConsenSys have to say? Gupta lied about her resume and was ASKED to resign, meaning she lost her right to the carry.
According to a separate filing after Gupta’s, ConsenSys alleges Gupta lied about degrees from Harvard and MIT, a job at McKinsey, space tech patents and even a stint with NASA (!!!). ConsenSys claims Gupta presented fabricated documents to back up her claims.
7/10
ConsenSys claims Gupta lost her carry after the “fraud” was discovered. With her suit, ConsenSys is now countering, asking for her salary, bonuses and any equity given back.
8/10
The curious part is the time discrepancy between the "resume fraud" being discovered, and her leaving the firm. The court will have to weed its way through two different time lines.
9/10
Takeaway? One of Ethereum's most important VC firms is about to go thru a messy legal ordeal. It could have implications for every founder, project and token involved.
10/10
Extra: All this information is public and stated in the linked documents. I have no affiliation with either party, but find it interesting given ConsenSys place in the larger ecosystem.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And we're lucky enough to share the story first:
📺
The Navajo and the US have a complicated, one-sided history.
In 1868, the Navajo agreed to live under US rule. The results speak for themselves 👇
-48% average unemployment
-30% live without basic utilities
- 30% live below the poverty line
But the Navajo are a resilient people who've claimed the the desert Southwest as home since time immemorial. They are no strangers to financial abuse (Wells Fargo 2019), resource exploitation (uranium) or dead ends (coal plant layoffs).
Miner Extractable Value (MEV) describes any value miners (or traders) squeeze out of sequencing transactions.
Typically its done on the in-coming block. A miner, say @ethermine_org can choose how to sequence the block if they find the nonce.
But what if you could go back in time? 🤔
You can with blockchains, if you have the right tools. Here, the tip of the chain is re-orged to sequence transactions favorably to miners in what is called a time bandit attack.
I'll be live tweeting this morning's Ethereum AllCoreDevs call on ProgPoW, a controversial mining algo update which has made its way around the eth dev carousel a few times.