This Nov 22, 2016 email describes corrupt Ukrainians and a $7 million bribe to shut down a legal effort to retrieve over $23 million stolen from Ukraine’s oil and gas leasing program. Kent points out that the US effort to stop this type of corruption is undermined by Hunter
Biden’s position on the board of corrupt Burisma while Joe Biden was VP. This email was never produced to those defendanting Trump in his first impeachment, although the corruption described in the email outlines exactly the same transaction s, and draws the same conclusions, as
Rudi Giuliani’s work on behalf of Trump in the lead-up to the impeachment. Here is the Solomon article. Quite a bombshell: justthenews.com/accountability…
I would add that this email drastically muddies up Joe Biden’s role in having the Ukrainian prosecutor fired. The person on whose behalf the bribe was made was Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky. The fired prosecutor was pursuing asset collection and criminal investigations
against Zlochevsky snd Burisma. The Kent email mentions Blue Star, a lobbying firm hired by Burisma, who Hunter arranged meetings for with State Dept officials. Anyone claiming the Biden’s’ Burisma deal wasn’t evidence of corruption should recheck their facts in light of this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thinking some more on what’s going on with the newest Durham revelation that Durham just this month obtained new documents from the OIG, here’s my theory. The documents relate to a meeting Sussmann had in March 2017 with the OIG- specifically the IG and the OIG general counsel,
about something Sussmann’s client, Joffe (Tech Executive-1) found: A computer used by an employee of the OIG had surfaced somehow on the internet and that the computer was linked to a foreign- based VPN. That fact alone raises all sorts of questions, such as how Joffe found this,
whether what he found was part of a contract obtained by his company Neustar with the FBI- that very month, and whether there was any blackmail involved. For if the supposedly illicit communications by someone within the OIG became known by Joffe as part of Neustar’s cyber
Perusing @ProfMJCleveland ‘s thread on the excellent brief filed on behalf of Carter Page by @McAdooGordon , to me the single biggest claim is the one that we know the least about: the so-called “leak strategy” referenced in Lisa Page’s texts to Strzok, concerning leaks of
classified information, including the fact that there was a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page as a Russian agent. Here is @@ProfMJCleveland on that subject:
We know that former staffer with the Senate Intel Committee, Michael Wolfe, pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI about leaking to a reporter, who happened to be his mistress, the fact of the C Page warrant. But the “leak strategy” referenced by Lisa Page went beyond that single
In a brilliant interview by @JanJekielek on Epoch Times, novelist and essayist @walterkirn describes our plight in the face of what he calls the “hydra-headed monster,” the bureaucracy: “We sit squarely in the middle of an absurdist drama.” Highly recommended.
There are gems upon gems throughout the interview. For example, Kirn takes on elitism. His view is that the elites believe it to be their job to “engineer and bring about right behavior,” using tools the masses don’t know are being used. Think psyop campaigns. Kirn is not a
conspiracy theorist. He even rejects the idea that he’s a contrarian. Rather, as someone who lives in a small town in Montana and knows the owner of the local hardware store, he has seen first hand what the elites with their increasingly absurd edicts have wrought.
This WSJ opinion article raises an interesting issue with respect to the duties of the Solicitor General who argued the mandate case last week. As the article describes, the CDC has acknowledged that vaccines do not stop the spread of the Omicron variant, which now represents
A lawyer owes an ethical duty of candor to the court, which in practice means that when a lawyer cites facts or authorities, for which there are contrary published authorities or facts in the record, the lawyer owes an ethical duty to point out the contrary facts and opinions.
This one contains some new allegations not raised before by others. First, the lawsuit outlines what’s characterized as the “Schiff Playbook.” Taken from Schiff’s recent book, Jones alleges that in reliance on techniques developed during two Trump impeachments, Adam Schiff
developed a playbook for the “draconian use of Congress’s coercive powers to bypass assertions of constitutional rights.” The playbook’s features include: a) refusal to resolve assertions of privilege in court; b) creating public crimes of obstruction for assertions of
As @Techno_Fog reported, on Friday the Durham team filed a pleading in the Danchenko case, suggesting the court take note of a potential conflict Danchenko’s new lawyers may have, because a lawyer who joined the firm in 2021 as “of counsel,” represented the Clinton campaign and
some campaign members. That new lawyer is Robert P Trout, who also appeared as attorney for John Podesta when he gave a deposition for the HPSCI. At the time Trout was affiliated with his own firm. During the Mueller investigation, Trout represented Hope Hicks, and he defended
Bijan Rafiekian, who was charged with FARA violations arising out of his business dealings with Mike Flynn. According to Durham’s filing, Trout’s new firm, Schertler, Onorato, Mead & Sears, have created a Chinese wall to protect the confidences of the firm’s new client, Danchenko