A new phase in difficulties over the Northern Ireland protocol in which a DUP Stormont minister instructs his officials to stop enforcing an international treaty. Impossible to know what happens next, if these continue or not, or how the EU responds. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northe…
As we can see from events in Russia / Ukraine, there is no enforcement power in international law if one party decides to breach treaties. However, we also know that it is normally the larger powers that have more scope for breach than smaller ones.
Expect a strong reaction from the US and the EU if the UK fails to enforce the Northern Ireland protocol. At a time when the US wishes to focus attention on Russia / Ukraine, such a move would not be seen in a positive light. (see e.g. Suez / Hungary)
Reasonable to assume in normal circumstances the UK government would overrule the Northern Ireland executive. But this can't be assumed with the protocol. Busy evening for some folk I suspect.
This incidentally is the exact equivalent of the time the EU threatened to override the Northern Ireland protocol over vaccine supplies. That lasted only a few hours. Will the DUP threat last any longer?
Suffice to say that right now the UK failing to enforce an international treaty would be widely seen as an act of the grossest stupidity / parochialism and undo all the good impressions we have given over our response to Russia / Ukraine. Your move, UK government.
Irish government pretty blunt, as will be the EU (and the US). What response from the UK government?
The view of many in the EU is that the UK government is colluding with the DUP to break the Northern Ireland protocol. The Suez parallels (UK colluding with Israel while the Soviets invaded Hungary) are inevitable.
UK government is also believed by many to be ignoring entirely the nationalist and non-aligned communities in Northern Ireland, and only responding to the DUP. This is not a good basis for political stability.
Northern Ireland protocol threats might all yet be resolved this evening at least for the short term, like the EU's threat of almost exactly a year ago, but not a great moment for the UK
UK government says devolved authorities do not have to follow international law. An extraordinary and ridiculous statement, but one the Scottish government for one may well be particularly interested in.
Collusion will be assumed. But that isn't the main point, which is that the UK government is tonight saying that international law and treaties are optional. Suffice to say that will be widely noticed.
This would seriously worry a serious government that was interested in peace in Northern Ireland.
What happens next hard to tell. Unclear if civil servants have to follow an order to break domestic and international law. Unclear how EU and US will respond. Nationalist and non-aligned communities will see UK government as only caring for one side. None of this is positive.
It is increasingly clear that there needs to be a renewed political process to resolve issues around Brexit, which builds on the Good Friday Agreement, and that the Protocol structures are not sufficient. But hard to see the trust and goodwill for that right now.
Would also be very interested in the diplomatic traffic tonight from Dublin to DC and back to London. At a time when the west was starting to unite over Russia, a renewed schism between London and Brussels will not go down well in the US.
Legally the UK government can intervene to ensure the Northern Ireland Executive respects international treaties signed by the UK.
Also a good question. And an important one - the UK government signed an international treaty against DUP opposition but now says that opposition must overrule the international treaty, and the DUP is not a negotiator but has implementation power.
The UK government has rarely acted in good faith with regard to the Northern Ireland protocol. And while the EU approach has had faults throughout as well, these are not of the same order, and often relate to the UK's lack of serious engagement.
Let us see what tomorrow brings. But as of tonight relations between UK and EU are once again under strain, the UK's reputation as a lawful actor in the balance, and Northern Ireland politics even more difficult. Not a good few hours for anyone.
Postscript to last night's events - looks like nothing has yet changed on the ground. Good. But the UK government have once again demonstrated their contempt for international law, not a good look.
Presumably based at least in part on what has or hasn't changed this morning in Northern Ireland. Struggle to see either the UK government or EU having a clear workable strategy on protocol resolution
It is also a statement of fact that it is the UK government which make international law commitments as to the nature and extent of those SPS checks. And on the UK if they are broken, not on the devolved government.
And on we go. The crisis of Northern Ireland and Brexit coming to a new peak, two years after the Protocol was signed and Julian Smith as NI Secretary delivered the New Decade New Approach agreement. And was then sacked for honesty and competence.
The UK government could have chosen to build on January 2020 agreements, would have been difficult, but such is politics in Northern Ireland. Instead it chose to lie about the implications of the Protocol, and then seek to reverse it, blaming the EU, to growing EU and US anger.
A disgracefully cavalier approach to Northern Ireland peace from the UK government, treating it just like a game as the Prime Minister does with everything else. Underpinned by constant attacks on the EU and even US for not agreeing with us.
I don't like the Protocol, I didn't like the original Northern Ireland backstop upon which it was based. It wasn't based upon cross community consent. But Boris Johnson signed it, his MPs voted for it, unlike the DUP, to get Brexit done and win an election.
Ultimately there is no power to stop countries signing agreements in bad faith and then rejecting them because they are no longer politically useful. But expect that to have consequences domestically and internationally.
Has Boris Johnson at any point taken responsibility for signing the Northern Ireland Protocol?
So, political posture from DUP and Government, without impact on the ground? Deepening the mess overall, but if meant to make an impact on EU negotiations, I doubt it will. A new start is needed (paper out early next week, promise...)
Looks like the UK government is backtracking on Northern Ireland checks, not surprisingly. They didn't think it through. Again.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Henig 🇺🇦

David Henig 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidHenigUK

Feb 2
Supply chain problems are the modern economy. The fact the world only noticed them in 2020 doesn't make it a crisis now. We've had a pandemic in which the world has by and large continued to enjoy the goods it did beforehand. An incredible achievement. nytimes.com/2022/02/01/bus…
The question to ask is whether a different system of production and distribution would have delivered better results in response to a pandemic. Never say never, but there's no history of an alternative delivering in a better way.
The aftermath of a major shock, whether war or a pandemic, is a problematic time, as readjustment is needed. That's normal, it doesn't need some great panic around it. Not least from populist politicians liable to make things worse in their limited understanding.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
This bit is slightly interesting. Those of us who understood how modern regulation worked always said "absolute regulatory freedom" was a delusion. It can't be used, because a modern economy is interdependent with others. But that's not an acceptable message right now.
Slurring everyone who argued against the hardest possible Brexit as 'remoaners' effectively meant accepting an alternate reality in which pure UK regulatory control was Brexit and hugely beneficial, as opposed to the global reality of complex inter-dependencies.
For the UK to yield huge regulatory gains you have to assume that we can regulate better than other countries, that companies will choose us because of this, and then other countries will not compete. All of which are problematic. At best, we may get some limited gains.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2
Lots of worthy stuff, but piecemeal devolution and funding competitions, plus lots of targets, makes Levelling Up feel like more of the same rather than anything particularly new.

Always easiest that way in government, but UK politics rather lacking in ideas right now.
Changing world, no great change in UK government thinking since 1997. Brexit as a distraction which doesn't solve many of our issues, and adds more. Treasury spending the main variable as various schemes come and go.
The UK muddling through, as the @DuncanWeldon book on our economic history has it. Still plenty of economic strengths, but uneven distribution of them a theme for many years, and there's honestly little in the levelling up plans seen so far to think that will change much.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
Afraid I don't see much that is in any way new in the government's take on regulation - we've been doing this better regulation stuff for 25 years in the UK under different governments. Evidence of results is sketchy at best, and perhaps it is time for a proper rethink.
Obviously when thinking seriously about regulation you first have to acknowledge Grenfell as the single biggest UK regulatory failure of recent years, costing lives and huge sums in remediation. That has absolutely nothing to do with being in the EU or not.
More broadly, I think the costs and benefits approach to regulations probably takes us too much into an inaccurate numbers game when we'd be better off moving towards a broad assessment of all factors - whether alternatives, trade, enforcement, timing.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 1
One for the series of 'who could possibly forecast' about Brexit - that the French might not wave all UK trucks into the country once they didn't have to do so (a big part of Thatcher's reasoning for the single market) theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
The consistent failure to admit over five and a half years that there is a choice between regulatory independence and interaction with other countries. North Korea might have the greatest regulatory autonomy of any country, in the name of sovereignty. Not much of a model though.
Brexit can't deliver while Ministers and the ultras deny there are any drawbacks or choices, because you can't fix a problem you deny. So instead we get the waffle about imperial measurements and being the greatest at absolutely everything for ever and ever.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
Desperate husband pleading forgiveness after multiple betrayals by falsely saying he isn't well.
Said it before, but any Conservative MP defending Johnson is now saying that overtly lying to Parliament is fine.
Wait a few months and Conservative MPs will be arguing that a Prime Minister found to have committed crimes has done nothing wrong.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(