Revenue: 33.7B vs 33.4B (beat)
EBIT: 12.6B vs 13.1B (miss)
Net Income: 10.3B vs 11B (miss)
EPS: $3.72 vs $3.83 (miss)
DAP: 2.82B, up 8% yoy
MAP: 3.59B, up 9% yoy
DAUs: 1.93B, up 5% yoy
MAUs: 2.91B, up 4% yoy
Ad impressions: Up 13% yoy
Price per ad: Up 6% yoy
Headcount: 71,970 up 23%
Share repurchases: $19.18B in Q4 21
Total shares repurchased for full year 2021: $44.81B
$38.79B left in the tank for more share repurchases.
Similar to the shift from desktop feed to mobile feed and to stories, Mark is leading the next pivot into Reels.
It will further cannibalize its ad revenue from feed in the short-term but this move is key to capturing younger adults.
Users are increasingly sharing content via DMs rather than posting on public feeds.
Important for Mark to strengthen WhatsApp's and DMs infrastructure and figure out a way how to better monetize this segment as users spend more time in community groups.
•Less targeted ad
•Tougher to track conversions for advertisers
The former results in less ROI for advertisers.
The latter results in underestimating the ROI.
Beat on revenue but missed on EBIT and EPS estimates largely due to heavy investment into the Metaverse.
Imo, missing the estimates not a real concern here.
More important to focus on how they navigate competition (Tiktok) and iOS changes.
First drop off in DAUs?!
Growth in Asia, particularly in India, seems to be strongly affected by Tiktok and to lesser extent, increase in data package pricing as the telco war in India ease off.
Management retracting from their earlier statement on the iOS changes.
Earlier they highlighted that iOS changes would make FB platform stronger vis-à-vis other platforms.
Now they estimate iOS to cost them $10B.
Why Google is unscathed from iOS changes:
They pay >$10B to Apple each year to remain the default search engine on iPhones.
May FB should've just paid a "tax" to Apple too, considering the cost from iOS changes is around $10B.
With the iOS changes, advertisers are finding it a lot tougher to measure their ROI on marketing spend.
This becomes critical during sales season as advertisers are monitoring their ROI and deciding whether to increase spend on an hourly basis.
Fundsmith is on track for its 5th year of underperformance.
In a recent interview, Terry Smith explains the reasons why—and what he thinks is wrong with the market today.
Key insights: 🧵
Smith breaks down the underperformance into distinct phases:
2022-23: Interest rates rose from 0% to 5%
2023: Magnificent Seven concentration
2024: AI boom/hype
Throughout: Passive fund flows
He claims each one is a headwind for quality investors.
On interest rates:
Quality companies trade at higher valuations because more cash flows are in the future. When rates rise, they behave like long-dated bonds—they get hit harder.
"When rates go up, our type of companies suffer in share price terms and companies which we wouldn't own which are very cyclical or not very good actually relatively benefit."
Eric Seufert and Ben Thompson just released an interview that reframes AI monetization strategy.
Why affiliate links fail, why "agentic commerce" won't happen, the Netflix lesson OpenAI is ignoring, and Meta's first real bear case in years.
What stood out: 🧵
Context: Everyone assumes ChatGPT will monetize through affiliate links (Walmart, Etsy partnerships).
Seufert's argument: this is the wrong model. And the urgency is real—"OpenAI needs to launch its ads product today, they cannot wait."
Why affiliate advertising is wrong for ChatGPT:
1. It only monetizes queries with commercial intent
Seufert: "If you're using ads, you get to monetize everything because it's every single engagement. If you're just using affiliate links, you can only monetize the ones that are like, 'What's the DSLR camera?'."
This is what happens when you answer the "tell me about your weakness" question too honestly.
PayPal CEO Alex Chriss at Citi's FinTech Conference laid out the challenges so clearly it spooked the market.
Here's what he said: 🧵
1/ Consumer spending deteriorated suddenly mid-September and it's persisting into Q4.
Chriss: "We started to see a slowdown on consumers, particularly around discretionary spending, retail and really in middle to low income brackets, which play a significant role in PayPal."
The weakness is concentrated: "If we look at some of our cohorts of higher income spenders, they're still spending. But we are seeing pressure for middle to lower income."
Q4 branded checkout expected to grow slower than Q3 as a result.
2/ The branded checkout rollout is taking much longer than expected.
Only 20% complete after significant time. Chriss admitted: "That's probably the piece I underestimated the most in terms of just how long it would take to get that experience out to customers."
The timeline? "We're just going to have to go through the hard work over the next few quarters and maybe even a couple of years to get through our backlog of merchants."
Years, not quarters. That's a meaningful delay.
Why so slow? Technical debt worse than realized.
Chriss: "We have 15-plus years of really bespoke integrations across our merchant base. This was something I personally didn't appreciate when I got here of just how many different integration patterns there have been."