Parsons v. Colt (NV Supreme Court, liability): Respondents’ answer to petition for rehearing
"Instead of attempting to demonstrate a flaw in this Court’s analysis, the Petition instead focuses on arguing why the holding is purportedly poor public policy." caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseVie…
"Instead of attempting to demonstrate a flaw in this Court’s analysis, the Petition instead focuses on arguing why the holding is purportedly poor public policy." caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseVie…
"This same flaw plagued much of the Parsonses’ underlying briefing."
"Specifically, the Petition asserts that this 'Court’s decision rewards and encourages illegal sales of machine guns[.]'"
"Lacking a cognizable basis for rehearing, the Petition fuels its misplaced policy arguments by misconstruing the store-clerk hypothetical."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
