we’ve been trying some tweaks to how the information is structured in the react docs beta api reference. would love to hear what you like/dislike about this useState page! beta.reactjs.org/reference/uses…
not gonna lie, i feel pretty lost about the “not api-like” feedback. i’m not sure if this is a slice of power users or representative of what we’ll hear en masse. guess i’ll try to make a dry version to feel it out.
i think the structure of the page is actually very api-like because it’s structured around different overloads and goes outside-in from the api nesting perspective. maybe the headers don’t make it obvious..
this is a really good way to put what’s wrong with this page, i think. the info is there but it’s not obvious how to locate it.
https://twitter.com/aweary/status/1489266915470196743
for the people who wanted it to be more terse, do you prefer this version? …org-gr06eox3g-fbopensource.vercel.app/reference/uses…
so i spent a few hours trying to combine them and here’s what i ended up with: …org-prl48zwe2-fbopensource.vercel.app/reference/uses…
thoughts from both camps? is it best of both worlds? worst of both worlds? just meh? tell me!!
thoughts from both camps? is it best of both worlds? worst of both worlds? just meh? tell me!!
all right, we shipped this combined version. thanks all for feedback, and @sophiebits for the edits! beta.reactjs.org/reference/uses…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
