Sunak also announces rebates to 80% of homeowners, those in bands A to D. But, as I asked yesterday, where is the help for soaring energy costs for the millions on low earnings who rent?
The treasury believes 95% of renters pay council tax directly and so will benefit from the energy rebate. I wonder if the data on that is as robust as they believe.
So the Treasury has clarified what they mean by 95% of renters being covered by the rebate. What they mean is 95% of renters are in bands A to D. But they have NO DATA on how many of those renters pay for energy in their own names versus how many pay through a landlord...
So the Treasury cannot be confident that the £150 will actually get to low-income renters rather than being pocketed by unscrupulous landlords. That seems to me to be a potentially big flaw in the scheme to protect the poorest from his humungous price rise
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@Keir_Starmer is for the first time developing a distinctive narrative for his and Labour’s mission. It is mostly about Boris Johnson. Here it is, in his speech on trust in politics this morning: “It is often said that the Prime Minister doesn’t believe the rules apply to him…
“That he has a sense of entitlement which transcends the normal rules of politics. I think it is considerably worse than that. It isn’t that the Prime Minister thinks the rules don’t apply. He absolutely knows that they do…
“His strategy is to devalue the rules so they don’t matter to anyone anymore. So, that politics becomes contaminated. Cynicism and alienation replace confidence and trust. So that the taunt “politicians are just in it for themselves” becomes accepted wisdom…
The Chancellor is tomorrow set to unveil a set of loans, subsidies and rebates to reduce the impact of the expected £700 increase in typical household energy bills that will bite from April. He’ll do so at circa 11am, to coincide with the Ofgem announcement of new price cap…
I’ve said for a while, the cap is set to rise from just under £1300 to circa £2000 - which would be totally unaffordable for hundreds of thousands of low income households. @thetimes says today Sunak’s package will include some kind of loan scheme to energy companies…
to help them reduce (though not eliminate) the immediate price increase, by deferring some of the price rise for consumers to future years. What is unclear is the mechanism for repaying that multi-billion pound loan and whether it is at all linked to future movements in the…
It gets worse for the Department of Health and Social Care. The public sector’s auditor in chief, Garett Davies, refused to give a clean bill of health to the department’s 2020/21 accounts, he “qualified” the accounts (in the jargon) because “£1.3 billion…
of the Department’s COVID-19 spending was spent either without the necessary HM Treasury approvals or in breach of conditions set by HM Treasury. Davies has also qualified his regularity opinion due to insufficient evidence to show that the Department’s spending, particularly…
on COVID-19 procurement, was not subject to a material level of fraud”. He is basically saying the department failed the test of competence. The findings that the department may have been subject to “material” fraud and breached Treasury stipulations are damning…
Buried on page 199 of the Department of Health and Social Care’s annual report published yesterday is the shocking disclosure that it has incurred £8.7bn of losses - £8.7bn ! - on £12.1bn of PPE bought in 2020/21. Think about how that money could have been…
deployed in hospitals. Surely there needs to be a statement from @sajidjavid to parliament about this. Here is the excerpt from the DHSC annual report: “the Department estimates that there has been a loss in value of £8.7 billion of the £12.1 billion of PPE purchased in 2020-21…
“This impairment relates to: • £0.67 billion of PPE which cannot be used, for instance because it is defective; • £2.6 billion of PPE which is not suitable for use within the health and social care sector but which…
For Tory MPs who regard partygate as being a prime ministerial competence issue, rather than an ethical issue, it is striking that of the three "parties" or events Sue Gray was asked to investigate by the PM, two are not deemed by the Met Police as being potential breaches...
of the criminal law (namely the leaving party for Cleo Watson and the party at the department for education). Only the Downing Street Christmas party on 18 Dec 2020 passed the threshold for police investigation, along with 11 other events that Sue Gray subsequently determined...
to be in scope of her investigation. There are a couple of inferences to be drawn. 1) Gray was robustly independent in her investigation, taking her inquiry considerably further than the PM would have wanted or expected. 2) The PM is now...
It matters that the Cabinet Office briefed that Sue Gray is delivering an “update” to the PM and NOT her report or definitive findings. She chooses her words carefully. As the PM has always said “judge me on the report”, she is explicitly saying this is not the moment to…
convict and evict him or find him innocent. There is also an implication in the “update” word that she is holding the PM to his earlier commitment to publish her full report, despite prevarication from Downing St this morning, as and when the police remove their objections
That said, it is not her decision what will subsequently be published. The PM is shortly to publish her investigation “update”in full. And as the commissioner of the report, the PM may feel he has honoured his commitment to her. it will eventually be his decision whether her…