Share this page!

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Twitter logo
Feb 4 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
These filings by Capitol Police don't surprise me (an entire chapter in my book covers the bad behavior of this agency) but need more public attention.

@JudicialWatch doing the heavy lifting. Not an unreasonable request given the January 6 "truth seekers," right?

USCP: Nope.
lol USCP refer to January 6 in legal motions as an "insurrection."

Aren't you glad Congress, including most GOP, just gave this agency $2 billion more in our money?
Sorry, Capitol police are way too busy compiling secret dossiers on GOP lawmakers, their staff, donors, and constituents to look for emails.

What a massive cover-up
Instead of holding Capitol police's feet to the fire after January 6, GOP gave the department medals and billions more in funding. Now they have their own "intelligence" unit to spy on them. They never learn
amgreatness.com/2022/01/27/mee…
I wrote this in May. USCP takes direction from Pelosi and the Biden regime. They lied about Sicknick, argued in court to keep surveillance video under seal, fortified the Capitol for months, created an "intel" unit, and wants to expand across the county:

amgreatness.com/2021/05/24/tim…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julie_kelly2

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 31
More white-knighting for Ray Epps by ⁦@woodruffbets⁩.

Now Betsy won’t explain to me or ⁦@DarrenJBeattie⁩ why the idea the FBI or other agencies provoked J6 is a “conspiracy theory.”

She goes unchallenged on MSNBC and blasts us (unnamed) for… lovebreedsaccountability.com/2022/01/31/swa…
raising legit and fact-based questions about Epps and others. Of course there’s more to the notion the FBI planned and executed January 6

Maybe @woodruffbets should read all of revolver.news reporting:
Since @politico has completely ignored the imploding Whitmer “kidnapping” case, maybe Betsy could get up to spend and find out what this FBI is capable of and that caper’s ties to J6. Maybe even do some reporting on it!

amgreatness.com/2022/01/17/mor…
Read 4 tweets
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 27
Julie Farnam, head of USCP intelligence unit collecting secret dossiers on US citizens without authority, is a former Obama-era DHS official.

She took over USCP intel unit right before the 2020 election.

Farnam presumably worked with Lisa Monaco...

politico.com/news/2022/01/2…
Obama's last Homeland Security Advisor.

Monaco now is deputy attorney general, essentially running DOJ and managing the January 6 probe.

This is how Obama loyalists continue his goal of criminalizing political dissent and targeting Republicans.

amgreatness.com/2021/04/22/sen…
Oh ok:
"Her team's 'overall analysis' raised concerns about permits given to groups affiliated with 'Stop the Steal,' known to attract 'white supremacists' and 'militia members … who actively promote violence.'"

cbsnews.com/news/capitol-p…
Read 4 tweets
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 26
Setting aside the cut and paste nature of this column—it’s clear Soave hasn’t done any original reporting or research—this is an LOL:

“Indeed, the revelations have prompted considerable, welcome scrutiny of the case from the mainstream media.”

A total myth.
Aside from some solid reporting by BuzzFeed, NYT finally published one article on Whitmer caper after I wrote this:

amgreatness.com/2022/01/10/the…
“Many conservatives have become committed to the idea that the January 6 attack…was not the work of Trump supporters, but rather, elements of the so-called Deep State. There's no evidence for that.”

You can also tell someone who’s done zero reporting on January 6.
Read 4 tweets
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 25
Thread on this hearing today.

Judge Mehta, an Obama appointee handling the Oath Keepers case, today announced there is a "public interest" in getting trials underway.

Translation: Democrats need show trials for 2022.
For months, Metha has allowed DOJ to slow-walk discovery obligations, blow past set deadlines. At the same time, Mehta has excluded time from Speedy Trial act as DOJ complained about the massive trove of discovery in the case.

Mehta is keeping in jail 3 Oath Keepers who...
were supposed to go to trial on original charges this month. DOJ kept producing discovery and adding superseding indictments so he pushed back the trial for the detained defendants until April.

None is charged with a violent crime BTW

Today Mehta AGAIN moved that trial to July
Read 7 tweets
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 25
Hearing up now in Oath Keepers case. Judge Mehta presiding. This will deal with the newest indictment for "seditious conspiracy," which I wrote about here.

amgreatness.com/2022/01/20/the…
The 3 DC detainees are on phone via gulag. Sounds like Stewart Rhodes also on the conference line.

Jessica Watkins has a new attorney, Jonathan Crisp, who also is representing Tim Hale.

DOJ dismissing previous indictment against 9 OK defendants facing new sedition charges.
This is the new indictment; defendants now being arraigned.

Rhodes pleads not guilty on all charges.
Read 13 tweets
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Jan 25
My guess why DOJ threatening to charge one of its top FBI informants in Whitmer case. Not just to prevent defense from calling him as a witness in entrapment case, but to delay March 8 trial.

DOJ does NOT want this trial taking place while J6 trials are underway:
This is DOJ strategy in J6 cases. Add co-defendants to justify asking court to delay trial—defense begrudgingly goes along because new defendant poses challenges to defense arguments.

We’ll see tomorrow if it worked in Oath Keepers case. After more than a year…
DOJ indicted Stewart Rhodes. This throws a monkey wrench into Oath Keepers defense, especially since one defense lawyer wanted to subpoena Rhodes for his central role—Person One—in conspiracy case.

Judge Mehta will decide tomorrow if 1st OK trial will still proceed in April.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @julie_kelly2 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @julie_kelly2!

Read all threads by @julie_kelly2

:(