My guess why DOJ threatening to charge one of its top FBI informants in Whitmer case. Not just to prevent defense from calling him as a witness in entrapment case, but to delay March 8 trial.
DOJ does NOT want this trial taking place while J6 trials are underway:
DOJ does NOT want this trial taking place while J6 trials are underway:
This is DOJ strategy in J6 cases. Add co-defendants to justify asking court to delay trial—defense begrudgingly goes along because new defendant poses challenges to defense arguments.
We’ll see tomorrow if it worked in Oath Keepers case. After more than a year…
We’ll see tomorrow if it worked in Oath Keepers case. After more than a year…
DOJ indicted Stewart Rhodes. This throws a monkey wrench into Oath Keepers defense, especially since one defense lawyer wanted to subpoena Rhodes for his central role—Person One—in conspiracy case.
Judge Mehta will decide tomorrow if 1st OK trial will still proceed in April.
Judge Mehta will decide tomorrow if 1st OK trial will still proceed in April.
If Mehta delays 1st trial—already moved from this month to April—based on new indictment and adding Rhodes, DOJ strategy worked.
My guess is, he will.
This is the copycat approach in Whitmer case.
My guess is, he will.
This is the copycat approach in Whitmer case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
