Adam Wagner Profile picture
Feb 4 5 tweets 2 min read
Jimmy Carr here saying there were positives about the Holocaust - that "gypsies" (itself a pejorative term for Roma) were murdered. This is grotesque. Netflix should not have broadcast it.
I was just about to say that I hope that the Holocaust memorial organisations come out strongly against this then I saw this excellent statement
I just watched the bit of the show (5mins 45secs from the end) where he makes this joke. The context (of the whole thing) is he is deliberately trying to be offensive and a bit "meta" and says at the beginning "this should be a career ender" then follows it (beyond the bit...
... in the clip by saying that this is an "educative" joke as not many people know about the "gypsies", homosexuals, Jehovahs Witnesses who were killed, then makes a bad joke about Jehovahs Witnesses turning up at the death camp with a magazine called Watchtower...
... But ultimately the core joke is relying on the audience laughing along with the joke regardless of how meta he tries to make it out to be. Importantly, he doesn't disown the joke or its implication even when explaining it afterwards.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

Feb 4
The EHRC plays key role in the UK's human rights framework. The allegations about how it is operating are serious and need to be resolved for the good of human rights in the UK - perhaps a useful time for the @HumanRightsCtte to investigate? @HarrietHarman
As I said in relation to the volte face on the EHRC's policy on trans rights, any significant change in position needs to be explained and at the moment all there is are allegations in the press and (non-detailed) denials from the EHRC's Twitter account.
The benefit of a @HumanRightsCtte inquiry is that it would give everyone a chance to explain what is going on, correct any misapprehensions (if there are any) and - most importantly - be accountable to the public whose human rights the EHRC is tasked to protect.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2
The PM is now reported as being at 6 parties:
🥳20.5.20 BYOB
🥳19.6.20 PM birthday
🥳13.11.20 Lee Cain leaving
🥳13.11.20 No.10 flat
🥳17.12.20 Capt Steve Higham leaving
🥳14.1.21 Private secs leaving
What possible enforcement could the police use?
Throughout the pandemic the police have followed the "4Es" policy (met.police.uk/advice/advice-…)

Engage, Explain, Encourage and Enforce

But generally that applies when they come across breaches, as Cressida Dick says it is unusual for them to enforce retrospectively.
I understand from @kirkkorner that there are some examples, especially early in the pandemic, of police going straight to charging with a criminal offence. But in most cases they try a Fixed Penalty Notice first.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 31
Just to pause there: there is a reasonably possibility a criminal investigation is taking place into an event which took place in the Prime Minister's flat.
The 2nd point (b) which sets my lawyer's senses tingling is that Gray is keeping her investigation's documents securely *away from the government". This is a constitutional mess and a half and shows problem of using an internal report to do job of an independent investigation
Actually, I have reread this para and it is not as ambiguous as I thought it was "the events on the date set out above*. Obvious enough that the gathering in the Prime Minister's flat is being investigated by the police.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
Sue Gray "update" report published assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Damning - but only in the generality. No detail of any particular event.
The most important new information in the report is that the police are investigating all of the gatherings she was investigating except four
Read 21 tweets
Jan 28
Another possibility is that arrests have been or are about to be made, in which case "proceedings" have begun under the Contempt of Court Act?
I suppose we will see what the story is - I wouldn't assume a "cover up" but it is possible (a) that police have evidence of more serious offences than under coronavirus regulations, (b) they are being super cautious in the context of a sensitive politicised investigation
Read 8 tweets
Jan 28
I am not a criminal lawyer so perhaps I am missing something. How would a factual civil service report about events the police is investigating "prejudice" their investigation?
It is absolutely normal for concerns to be raised about prejudice to a criminal *trial*. That is due to a concern that the jury will be influenced by press coverage and not be sufficiently objective (so we have special rules about jury trials and press coverage).
But the police don't, as far as I am aware, ask journalists not to report on ongoing *investigations* and often media will report on the factual circumstances surrounding a police investigation, then clam up once a charge has been brought.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(