Thanks @brennacgray for this thoughtful and important addition to the conversation. Critique is at the heart of what we do. I've certainly been disappointed to see attacks on folks' teaching abilities and ethos in response to their legitimate questions. That can't be it, y'all.
I just want folks to think about the good work that's going to be destroyed in service of short-term Twitter points. Please don't tell people who are legit concerned about a clearly questionable entity to "learn how to teach" when they point out those concerns.
I'm rooting for Sean to succeed. But I have serious concerns about CH, some of them drawn from personal experience. Both of these things are true, and I can hold them both together. If we extend Sean the benefit of the doubt, then the CH criticism has to get that benefit, too.
All of us who do this work want the same things. I have some pretty strong opinions on how we get there. They do not mesh with other strongly-held opinions in this community of practice we're all in. But the work is what's important, and I'd hate to see it devalued.
As Freire observed, learning is dialogical. And right now good faith attempts at critical dialogue are being throttled, and I don't like that. Critical Digital Pedagogy is not, and cannot be, a cool-kids club. What we say or write means nothing without a praxis that has integrity
It's hard. Even-especially-when everything seems like it's going to shit and we're all so damned tired. But there's so much good work in this messy but glorious CritDigPed community. Remember why we do it and remember the other humans doing it. As Yung Bleu said, we all we got.
Well shit. That turned into a thread, didn't it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Gannon

Kevin Gannon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheTattooedProf

Jan 31
Well now. What do you have to say, @CollegeBoard? Because this is all sorts of fucked up, and you have a serious problem.
Senior VP for State and Local Partnerships at the @CollegeBoard, while leading efforts to destroy education on the state level. I don't think that's mission-driven work, y'all.
State and *District Partnerships.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 24
I find it interesting that the historians who have denounced 1619 have used the one line about protecting slavery being the chief motive of many revolutionaries to characterize the whole thing, which is...much more than that. It's almost like they didn't do all the reading. 1/4
And Rakove's argument is basically "I disagree with NH-J and Woody Holton because reasons," and while there's a historiographical debate to be had here, the fact it's animating such a vehement denunciation of the entire 1619 Project-covering *all* of US history-is telling. 2/4
The 1619 Project refuses to center whites in the story it tells of whatever expansion of freedoms occurred in the US. "The good ones" take a back seat, and scholars who address slavery via a "not all whites" approach can't abide that. The story of freedom is not a white one. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 18
And straight out of the Tuskegee Experiments playbook--and those didn't end until the early 1970s when they finally became public.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 16
Dallas is gonna lose this game aren't they
Maybe not?
Never mind
Read 5 tweets
Jan 13
And the mushy centrists who gave these people oxygen share the blame for this. Your performative "listen to both sides" schtick helped give us new White Citizens' Councils. Great work, everyone.
"Well, speaking as a liberal, maybe if you intolerant antiracists didn't make these parents feel guilty about being white, we wouldn't have had these laws. If you really think about it, maybe it's wokeness that's the bigger threat to our schools"
I was told several months ago, by a prominent self-proclaimed defender of free speech and open debate, that my use of "fascism" to describe the school-board putsches was overwrought.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11
Saw this get shared on my TL. And I think it's the rhetorical equivalent of machine-gunning a mosquito. Moreover, this is the exact type of "nothing good is possible but at least we're not the GOP" rhetoric that alienates voters whether you like it or not. 1/x
Like, what's the audience for this? Some mythical Oberlin kid with a Che poster who thinks the Dems should seize the means of production? Or actual communities of voters (ESP communities of color) who just want some movement on things the Dems promise in return for their votes /2
I mean, sure, you can lecture these fictional hippies about how things work "in the real world," but read that language again and ask yourself: what does this person lecturing me *do* besides rationalize inertia? There's no there, there; it's just a frustrated screed /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(