A key takeaway from FERC audit of FirstEnergy: What started off as a "$60 million bribery scandal" is now more like a $133 million scandal. Let's breakdown the money in a thread.
FERC's audit team initially found FirstEnergy improperly included $10.9 million spent on lobbying in accounts reserved for expenses that are "presumptively recoverable" from ratepayers documentcloud.org/documents/2103…
Then FirstEnergy, after it signed an agreement with federal prosecutors, revealed additional political payments to FERC's audit team, including $22.8 million paid to two for-profit entities associated with former PUCO chairman Samuel Randazzo documentcloud.org/documents/2119…
FirstEnergy also disclosed to auditors that it paid a total of $70.9 to groups connected to the #HB6 bribery scandal, including Generation Now, Partners for Progress, and Hardworking Ohioans
FirstEnergy disclosed another $28.8 million in payments to 16 entities associated with an unnamed individual documentcloud.org/documents/2119… Based on a PUCO audit from last year, this individual may be Tony George, a politically influential businessman cleveland.com/politics/2021/…
It's worth noting that FirstEnergy still hasn't explained why payments to entities associated with Tony George became the subject of its internal investigation re: the criminal case against former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder
And the FERC audit doesn’t even account for most of payments to outside firms employed by FirstEnergy Solutions due to jurisdictional limits on FERC’s authority
2004: FirstEnergy publicly disclosed a $500K payment to IEU-Ohio, an org affiliated with future PUCO chairman Samuel Randazzo, in an annual report filed with the SEC, as was required at the time under the PUHCA energyandpolicy.org/firstenergy-se…
Congress repealed parts of PUHCA after 2004, and transparency faded. The money trail between FirstEnergy and Randazzo went dark for years, as Randazzo served on the PUCO Nominating Council and then as PUCO chairman energyandpolicy.org/firstenergy-se…
2022: It takes a bribery investigation and 3-year FERC audit to reveal $22.8 million in FirstEnergy payments to IEU-Ohio and another Randazzo entity documentcloud.org/documents/2119…
A federal court ruling broadened the definition of political spending that must be excluded from utility rates, says @OCC4Consumers, with potentially big implications for PUCO’s investigation into FirstEnergy’s misuse of ratepayer $ to support #HB6dis.puc.state.oh.us/DocumentRecord…
The court ruling could also raise new questions about $137 million in external affairs costs that FirstEnergy included in “above-the-line” accounts that #FERC reserves for utility operating expenses that are “presumptively recoverable” from ratepayers energyandpolicy.org/firstenergy-se…
The court ruling affirmed that FERC should have ordered a transmission company jointly owned by AEP and Allegheny Energy (FirstEnergy) should to refund $6 million in ratepayer money that was misused for political spending cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opini…