Share this page!

Alina Chan Profile picture
Twitter logo
Feb 4 • 14 tweets • 5 min read
Telegraph reports Jeremy Farrar, Wellcome Trust director, said the lab leak theory ruined international co-operation and shut the door on identifying animal origins..

Because when you're accused of a lab leak, you hide evidence of a natural #OriginOfCovid
telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/0…
Farrar added: “If we now focus only on the lab side of this and we ignore the natural side, then we will miss the emergence of new pathogens which could be so disruptive to humanity.”

Not sure if Farrar was lucid in the past 2 years but the lab side was the side ignored.
Look at these monies invested into new centers for research in emerging infectious diseases!

Is there something equivalent for centers for research in preventing lab-based outbreaks?
niaid.nih.gov/news-events/ni…
The EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology over the past decade, was funded to do the same virus hunting work with more international partners:
npr.org/sections/goats…
Does the above look like "ignoring" zoonotic diseases and focusing on lab outbreaks?

Zero enforceable international measures have been taken to safeguard against risky virus research that could spark another pandemic.
Maybe if ignoring means flooding with monies.
And focusing means not doing **** about the problem.
Am I understanding correctly that Farrar said he and his peers shut down the lab #OriginOfCovid, not because of scientific reasons, but to maintain cooperation with China and solely investigate a natural origin of the virus?
Because if Covid came from a lab, his approach has harmed our chances of investigating the #OriginOfCovid. It has shown nations & bad actors that no one can hold them accountable for lab-based outbreaks, and that scientists will help to shut down an investigation.
The gall to suppress a fair investigation of plausible origin scenarios, gaslight other scientists and the public, and then tell us that it is actually the lab #OriginOfCovid hypothesis that is putting the world at risk of a new pandemic.
If you think Covid-19 almost certainly came from nature with no interference from researchers, why would you hide your contributions to a prominent peer-reviewed letter dismissing a lab #OriginOfCovid
And then seek to put pressure on the @WHO #OriginOfCovid team from multiple sides...

Seriously, what is going on?
They do know that their highly redacted emails look extremely non-transparent and suspicious, right?

Are they aware this is hurting public trust in science? And is not a model for open science and transparency?
Or do they think that science transparency will also put us all at risk of a new pandemic?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 6
I think it's in poor form for @ScienceAdvances to have published this latest piece by EcoHealth/Daszak et al. without asking them to elaborate on how exactly they will work on improving the safety + transparency of virus discovery work.
h/t @TheSeeker268
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
@ScienceAdvances @TheSeeker268 "... for viral discovery, we chose to use the proposed budget of the Global Virome Project, a decade-long project that seeks to identify 70% of the unknown potentially zoonotic viruses in wildlife globally. It has an estimated budget of $120 million to $340 million per year."
@ScienceAdvances @TheSeeker268 I'd really like to know if any of the peer reviewers challenged this claim in the paper:

"Humanity needs a global viral discovery project if we are to prevent future pandemics."

How did all the virus discovery work in the past decade help to prevent pandemics?
Read 15 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 5
Will specific steps for investigating both natural and lab #OriginOfCovid scenarios be clearly laid out?
I'm concerned about the SAGO process of figuring out how to track the #OriginOfCovid because apparently one of the experts in the original China-WHO team didn't know that viruses are cultured at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Which might explain why he could not think of a way to investigate a lab #OriginOfCovid
Read 4 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 5
One's political leanings should not determine whether you want to squash the lab leak hypothesis or prove that it is true.

It's a myth that if you're a democrat or pro-science, you should want to debunk a lab #OriginOfCovid
It's likely because of my own network, but most of the people who have expressed concerns to me about a lab #OriginOfCovid and want it to be properly investigated are scientists (pro-science) and democrats/liberals.
Reporters & people describing the #OriginOfCovid issue (~6 million deaths & counting) as a political game where each side is betting on one origin should be ashamed of themselves.

The inquiry into #OriginOfCovid should be motivated by facts not one's wishes or tribalism.
Read 5 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 3
2 years post-pandemic I think we can largely agree on the following regarding #OriginOfCovid:

1. No direct evidence for or against any particular origin hypothesis has been found.

2. Likely or not, lab origin is plausible & should be investigated, not ruled out prematurely.
And hopefully also:

3. Regardless of whether #OriginOfCovid was natural or lab-related, we need to immediately develop and enforce new regulation, with measurable and publicly reported outcomes, to make risky virus research way more transparent and safer.
Scientists arguing over whether it's a 5% or 50% chance that Covid-19 came from a lab, instead of calling for an investigation + new regulation, are missing the point that the scientific community should already be acting to reduce that % chance of a lab-based pandemic down to 0.
Read 6 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 2
Scientists (and journalists), if you're afraid the lab #OriginOfCovid hypothesis will inflame racism, just say so. And explain why a lab accident has nothing to do with race.

Don't say that "science" says a lab #OriginOfCovid is a conspiracy theory. This politicizes science.
The moment our public figures and pundits (and even celebrities) start debating when it is acceptable to politicize science and, more importantly, who can politicize science, public trust in science is gone.
Hearing that some scientists and journalists might've cast the lab #OriginOfCovid hypothesis as a conspiracy theory to fight racism, and not because of actual science, makes me mad. As a scientist, as an asian person, and as a human being.
Read 4 tweets
Alina Chan Profile picture
Feb 2
For a criticism of the substance of Proximal Origin, please see my medium post on their 2021 critical review, which is a more updated comprehensive version of their argument for a natural #OriginOfCovid:
ayjchan.medium.com/a-response-to-…

For a criticism of the ethics of Proximal Origin...
I've laid out ad nauseam the problems with Proximal Origin - not only their scientific content - but especially the fact that they obscured key contributors to the paper and thereby their conflicts of interests on this topic.

We know now that at least one of the leaders/advisors of the paper had hoped Proximal Origin would put down the 'destructive conspiracy' that was an accidental lab escape #OriginOfCovid
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Ayjchan has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Ayjchan!

Read all threads by @Ayjchan

:(