As costs are rising across categories, it’s important to understand the potential IMPACT OF INFLATION METRICS CPI AND PPI to business fundamentals.
Let's cover the basics and some concrete examples.
Best served with a cup of 🫖
2/🧵
We’ve touched upon the topic of inflation before (when it was still below 2%) but from slightly different angle. In case you’ve missed it, you may find it here.
This time, however, we dive a little deeper with CPI and PPI.
In many cases companies are ready to take a strategic hit on their margins on behalf of customer price stability.
This can build customer loyalty and capture market share from short-term oriented competitors with erratic pricing.
6/🧵
Let’s take these dynamics to income statement through an example.
Here’s a company with revenues of 100, gross profit of 60 and operating income of 20. These numbers could belong to an excellent business.
Later, we alter the numbers to reflect different inflation regimes.
7/🧵
Since CPI reflects the consumer price level, it’s fair to assume it impacts REVENUES. As price increases are universal, we also assume it lifts OPERATING EXPENSES.
PPI reflects input costs to producers, so it mainly impacts COST OF GOODS SOLD.
See added rightmost column.
8/🧵
First, let’s add 3% CPI.
Since we assume it impacting revenues and operating expenses, the impact over time is net positive for the business (revenues grow more than operating expenses).
This requires pricing power from the business – otherwise its customers would flee.
9/🧵
Of course, it’s unrealistic to assume that there would only be ‘consumer inflation’ but no ‘producer inflation’.
Replicating our math by adding 3% PPI, we see that example company with pricing power doesn’t need to worry that much as profitability holds nicely over time.
10/🧵
Not every company can raise prices without fall in demand. This dynamic is generally captured by “price elasticity”.
Low elasticity means price impacts demand relatively little, e.g., electricity is bought even though more expensive. High elasticity means the opposite.
11/🧵
Here’s an earlier example of company with fantastic pricing power, See’s Candies.
Nowadays, for example, Apple $AAPL is considered a prime example of pricing power.
Back to our hypothetical example. What if PPI and CPI don’t go hand in hand?
We saw earlier that when CPI > PPI, it can be net positive for a company with pricing power.
What about when PPI exceeds CPI? Let’s try 6% PPI and 3% CPI.
13/🧵
As costs increase at a higher rate than revenues, our example company suffers from lower gross and operating margins over time with these assumptions.
This is not optimal environment to do business in.
14/🧵
If we consider the current inflationary environment, the numbers are in fact even higher with CPI at 7% and PPI at 20%.
Let’s plug in these numbers.
15/🧵
It becomes clear why central bankers need to address this situation: if held constant for years, margins deteriorate quickly even for good companies.
Of course, this is extreme illustration just to highlight the point.
But this exercise is not simply theoretical.
16/🧵
Our hypothetical example company is very similar to lubricant manufacturer WD-40 $WDFC with historical 50% gross margins and 20% operating margins, as visualized below.
Let’s see next how WD-40 has been impacted by current inflationary environment.
17/🧵
Here’s WD-40 $WDFC 4Q21 earnings when PPI was roughly 20% and CPI 7%.
As we can learn from WD-40, different inflation regimes have a clear impact on its business fundamentals. Stock's down -35% from its highs year ago.
As an investor, these concepts also make it easier to understand what is happening now and what to expect from the future.
19/🧵
To further study WD-40 $WDFC, see how its year-on-year changes in costs of goods sold have been tracking PPI nicely over the years.
This is obviously not true for every single company out there but especially so for certain industrial manufacturers.
20/🧵
This issue has been widely noticed.
Fundsmith's Terry Smith had this example in his recent annual shareholder letter to make similar point by adjusting producer price inflation (PPI), aka cost inflation, for different type of companies.
For further reading, Warren Buffett wrote this Fortune article “How Inflation Swindles the Equity Investor” amid the 10+% inflation spike of late 1970s.
If you found this thread helpful, do hit ‘like’ or ‘re-tweet’ to the first tweet so that others may benefit from this too. This helps to spread the joy of financial literacy.
Thanks a lot in advance, much appreciated 🙏
25/🧵
For more, follow @hkeskiva. I’ve earlier written on
- Capital allocation
- Incremental returns
- Buffett’s deals
- Market excesses
- Insurance float
etc.
You can find them all from the link below. Have a great weekend! 🤗
I’ve known Aswath Damodaran is great, but this may well be the most entertaining investment lecture there is.
The whole 45min lecture on the WORST VALUATION MISTAKES AND HOW TO AVOID THEM is worth watching but summarizing best bits in this thread.
🫖
2/🧵
“It takes me 45 mins to get into any topic, so I thought I'd pick something very specific. I thought I'd talk about deferred taxes for 45 mins.
If you think I'm serious, you're sick.”
3/🧵
“Most people who claim to do valuation are not doing valuation. They're doing pricing.
Pick up an equity research report. What do you see? You see a company. You see a multiple. You see comparables. So much of what passes for valuation out there is pricing.”
Viime kerralla kävimme läpi yhtä kassavirtaan keskittyvää lempitunnuslukuani (OCF/CAPEX).
Ketjun jälkeen mieleen juolahti, että lähestymistapaa voi entisestäänkin parantaa. Se kohtelee nimittäin kasvuyhtiöitä epäreilusti. Katsotaan kansantajuisesti, mistä on kyse.
🫖
2/🧵
Edellinen ketjuni käsitteli siis yrityksen kassavirtaprofiilia ja sitä, kuinka se jakautuu liiketoiminnan ja investointien rahavirtaan.
Mikäli ketju on lukematta niin kannattaa ehdottomasti aloittaa siitä.
Sovelletaan edellisen ketjun esimerkkiä vuoteen 1982. Katsotaan nykyään uskomattoman hyvin menestyneen, mutta tuolloin vasta listautuneen The Home Depot’n lukuja.
Yhtiö oli tuolloin vahvassa yli 70% vuosikasvuvauhdissa ja uusia liikkeitä syntyi liukuhihnalta.
Sijoittaja tarvitsee tietoa. Ammattilaissijoittajien suosima Bloomberg-terminaali saattaa maksaa kuitenkin yli 20 000 euroa vuodessa, mikä tekee siitä aivan liian kalliin useimmille.
Siksi kerään tähän ketjuun kaikille ilmaisia tietolähteitä, joita käytän itsekin.
🫖
2/🧵
Nostetaan ensimmäisenä kotimarkkinoiden @inderes ja heidän kotisivuilta löytyvät yhtiötiedot erityisesti suomalaisista yhtiöistä.
Tuloslaskelmat, kannattavuusluvut, arvostuskertoimet ja paljon muuta. Ohessa tiedot esimerkkinä Nesteelle. inderes.fi/companies/Neste
3/🧵
@KoyfinCharts on yksi parhaista kansainvälisistä, ilmaisista yritystietopalveluista. Helppokäyttöinen ja laaja palvelu sisältää keskeisiä tietoja myös pohjoismaisista yrityksistä, kuten suomalaisesta @valmetir, jonka tuloslaskelman lukuja ohessa.
Katsotaan tällä kertaa tarkemmin yhtä mieluisimmistani tunnusluvuista, johon en ole törmännyt juurikaan muualla.
Käydään tässä ketjussa läpi, miksi kassavirtojen suhteella on sijoittajalle väliä ja miten se liittyy maailman parhaisiin yhtiöihin.
🫖
2/🧵
Heti kättelyssä tärkeä selventää, että mikään yksittäinen tunnusluku ei kerro sijoituskohteen hyvyyttä tai huonoutta.
Samoin harjoitus on yksinkertaistus ja yksityiskohdilla voi halutessaan kikkailla mielin määrin. Pysyttelemme nyt kuitenkin mahdollisimman helpossa.
3/🧵
Ajatellaan kaksi yhtiötä, joilla molemmilla on sama 100 MEUR vapaa kassavirta. Molemmat yhtiöt arvotetaan viisitoistakertaisesti vapaan kassavirran verran eli molempien hinta 1 500 MEUR.
- Fed is going to reimpose its power, rates are going to go down, everything is going to go back to the way it was
- mean reversion to the last 10 years"