3/ Basically, someone edited together a video of @joerogan saying the N-word in his podcast.
The account that did this is acting in bad faith. We know this both because they edited out the context, and because that account supports Joe Biden, who also said the N-word on camera:
4/ In that video, Joe Biden is quoting someone else for a senate hearing, which is why he said it.
Context matters.
The fact that the context of the Rogan video is edited out is all the proof we need that this video was created, and circulated, in bad faith.
Now...tactics...
5/ The woke use a very simple, yet powerful, set of socail pressure tactics to get their way. They are done by different people, in different arenas (business, politics, media, etc) but they always use those tactics with the same goal:
Advancing wokeness and *silencing dissent*
6/ This is how it works
It all starts with "Power Mapping."
In their words: "Power Mapping is a tool to not only identify who holds that power, but, crucially, who holds influence over that person, and, therefore, who to target with your direct actions"
7/ Power mapping lets wokies determine who has the power to give them what they want, and how they can be vulnerable to pressure. Remember, wokies want to take power, to do that they need to know WHO to take it from and how. This is how wokies "survey the battlefield"
8/ They want to figure out how to attack, so they map the power dynamics: who has the power to do what and the weakness of each relevant person or institution.
Sometimes the target has no direct weaknesses, so you have to go after them by some other means. This brings us too...
9/ "Choose Your Target Wisely"
In their words: "You might not have enough power to push your primary target at first, but your actions may help you identify a secondary target...that can be pressured to leverage their influence on the primary target."
10/ If done correctly, wokies can determine smaller more vulnerable targets that can be pressured and leveraged to go after progressively larger targets. Like a domino effect where we knock over ever larger dominoes. (Pic 1)
How it is being used here is illustrated in pic 2:
11/ Once they pick a target they analyze the "spectrum of allies" and separate everyone into 5 groups: active allies -who fight with them passive allies -who agree but don't act neutrals, passive opposition- who disagree but don't act active opposition - who actively fight them
12/ The goal of the woke is to determine the social blocs at play on a given issue, and shift them closer to the woke position. If they can shift each group over one notch the the entire political spectrum moves, and they can shift their targets support out from under them.
13/ You see, if people mildly opposed to wokeness shut up and people who are in the middle pretend to like wokeness (to avoid cancellation) it *LOOKS* like the woke have majority support.
They threaten cancellation to shut people up and move each group one notch to the left...
14/ See how this works? They find the target, find out who has power over that target, and figure out what they can do to pressure that target.
Once they do that, they apply pressure as they see fit to shift the whole situation to their position.
That's what happened here
15/ They wanted to Cancel Joe Rogan because he has more power then the woke do.
So they tried to use Alex Jones and "Vaccine Misinformation" to cancel him. When that didn't work, they used an out of context video to call him racist, and tossed it at @TheRock in order to get...
16/ @TheRock to throw Rogan under the bus. The woke knew that the Rock doesn't want to be associated with racism in any way, and if they could make Rogan look racist the Rock would have to drop Rogan to save his own "Rock" brand.
What the Rock is doing is understandable....
17/ He has many employees depending on him so he can't afford to have his brand destroyed.
My point is that the woke know this, and they use this to their advantage. That's why Don Winslow did what he did: he wanted to force a response from The Rock.
And it worked.
18/ The woke are a well oiled machine of protest, mobbing, intimidation and social pressure. Until we realize that and begin organizing to fight back we will always be on our back foot.
Rogan needs our support, and @Spotify needs to know if they cancel him it will cost them...
19/ Nothing the woke do is authentic, organic, or spontaneous. It's all cynical, pre-planned powergames dressed up as an organic movement.
Every time they get a cancellation their power grows.
Everytime a cancel attempt fails their power decreases.
That's how this works...
20/
So take a stand now and start making these woke activists take some L's before it's too late.
/fin
Thanks for reading.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Almost all the feminist hot takes you see online are just women using feminist theory to create rage-bait for clicks.
This woman made content about how marriage is slavery and not wanting kids - now she's says she's getting married and that it's ok to do that if you want kids
2/ This particular woman has a podcast called "Maneater" which is basically full of anti-male and anti-marriage content and has 430K followers on tik tok. She is represented by Brillstein Entertainment Partners (a firm that represents both hollywood stars and influencers....
3/ With industry backing (which she has) a creator of her size can quite easily pull between $120,000/year or more. She is also clearly dating a man who is very wealthy, because he was able to buy her this $6000 Christian Dior handbag.
The left painted Christianity as a cringy, outdated, stuffy, religion of oppressors, so now leftist women looking for faith are picking the only religion they're allowed to like (Islam codes as brown so it can't be criticized), even though it makes the handmaids tale look tame.
Women on the left outnumber men on the left by a HUGE majority, and refuse to date right wing men. So a huge number of leftist women are therefore competing for a tiny number of leftist men. So Leftist women have almost no leverage when negotiating the terms of a relationship...
And because leftist women have adopted feminist liberation and consent morality, they have no morally consistent way to demand that men commit to them or settle down; as long as everything is consensual, leftist women have no moral grounds to demand men stop "dating around"...
2/ There is a difference between a recession and stagflation. A recession is just when an economy shrinks, and you usually get high unemployment and low productivity.
Recessions are bad, (no one likes unemployment) but they're nothing compared to the monster known as STAFLATION
3/ Stagflation is when you get a combinations of high inflation, high unemployment, stagnant growth, and lower productivity. And that combination of inflation, low productivity/growth and unemployment leaves the government with no good policy options for solving it because...
This kind of joke is becoming popular on the left, and I think it's because on a subconscious level they know they're all just using social justice as an excuse to create theories they can tactically deploy to grab the upper hand in social situations.
Whenever they don't get what they want they invoke social justice discourses (feminism, Critical Race Theory, BLM, decolonization, etc) as a way to get the moral leverage they need to get the upper hand in whatever interaction they are having
And they do this constantly in interpersonal interactions and personal relationships, where they invoke social justice jargon in order to grab moral authority within the conversation so they can get what they want.
The biggest problem with letting illegal immigrants stay is that it is unjust. Why does nobody make this simple point?
It is unjust to ask immigrants who come legally to work for years to become citizens while letting those who enter illegally to be rewarded with citizenship.
When there is a set clear of fair rules for how immigration is to be done in a in orderly fashion, it is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to break the rules, skip to the front of the line, and then be rewarded with visas or citizenship just because left wing activists demand it
It is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to be rewarded for breaking the law and skipping to the front of the line. It doesn't matter if you feel empathy for the person doing the law breaking and the line skipping - it is unjust to reward that person with residency in the country
Leftists are having a tough time with Venezuelans celebtrating Maduro's arrest and the persians overthrowing Irans Islamic regime, because it means the people are rejecting both the communist and islamic halves of the leftists new islamo-communist/third world marxist coalition.
The left wanted to harnass the energy around the palestinian issue and use it to advance western marxism. So, they created an alliance between western marxist activists and Islamic fundamentalists/Hamas supporters using third-world marxism and postcolonial theory as the bridge.
They thought by getting the popular support of global south "subaltern" third-world groups, along with the support of the Islamic world, they would have a coalition big enough the challenge the United States, and which they would control by virtue of having organized it.