Parts of our brain are naturally wired to understand sounds and words.
But, no part of the brain comes wired at birth to understand letters / words.
With years of reading instruction, we train our brains to recognize words, as @carolyn_strom explains.
.@carolyn_strom has been working on ways to explain the neuroscience of reading to families, without all of the scientific jargon, using a storytelling framework.
She has given more accessible names to the parts of brain doing the work of learning language & literacy.
Sound City is the part of the brain where sounds are stored.
Mountains of Meaning is where words and their meaning are stored.
I tried taking a video of @carolyn_strom’s intro to her framework, and oops, it was the time-lapse photo above. 😂
I did get video partway in…
I love hearing @carolyn_strom explain the neuroscience of reading.
I think it’s so accessible to families… and teachers!
When we teach kids to read, we teach them to break words down to the finest sounds (segmenting), and then we need to train the part of the brain that is wired to recognize faces and objects to ALSO recognize letters.
In the years that kids learn to read, they build new neural pathways to connect these different parts of the brain.
The ability to recognize words with increasing automaticity, and to break down new worlds with ease, grows stronger with practice.
What does it look like when children are building these skills?
@carolyn_strom gives us a glimpse of those early years, and talks about the connection between the brain science and what we see with emerging readers.
One of my favorite things about UFLI: it asks 30 minutes a day from teachers for foundational skills work.
Teachers in this study were spending 30 min/day.
The attention that the UFLI team gave to creating an effective program *within a 30 minute window* is laudable.
We still live in a world where the “Science of Reading” encounters resistance for being over focused on phonics, and for robbing time from other valuable and exciting work like getting kids into rich texts.
If your program is 30 minutes/day, you leave plenty of time for the other essentials of literacy.
AND - if a 30-min program has gone viral within the Science of Reading community, that says a lot about the demand in that community.
.@C_Hendrick’s keynote at @researchED_US was astoundingly good.
I caught most of it on video…
Sorry that it’s in Tweetable chunks, but I promise that it’s worth the headache of pressing Play a few times.
What is learning, Carl asks?
The problem is that learning is highly counterintuitive.
How we think we learn, and how we actually learn, are more often than not very far apart.
@C_Hendrick
@C_Hendrick As he outlines the six paradoxes of learning, @C_Hendrick speaks personally about #2, the difference between working memory and long-term memory.
“I had no idea about this for the first 5 years of my teaching.”
They were once familiar to, and believed by, @MrZachG.
“I’m not a contrarian. I believed what I was told” in teacher preparation.
At @researchED_US:
His learning journey brought him to more effective practices.
@MrZachG details Project Follow Through, a massive US study of instructional approaches that showed the relative effectiveness of explicit instruction vs more popular approaches.
@MrZachG In his podcast, @MrZachG goes into detail on Project Follow Through with some of the original participants, including Linda Carnine: