Palmer Report Profile picture
Feb 5 16 tweets 3 min read
Key point: today's court didn't come from the DOJ. It came from Bannon, who's trying to paint himself as a victim (won't work). This means the DOJ is still not ready to reveal its overall probe, which at this point obviously covers Trump world and almost certainly includes Trump.
This filing reveals that the DOJ has been investigating not just Bannon, but also investigating Bannon's attorney, who happens to represent Giuliani, who's also known to be under investigation. This is far too sprawling not to be a probe of the *entirety* of Trump world.
It also reveals the DOJ has three federal prosecutors assigned to the Bannon case. Just for a contempt case that's already complete? Of course not. Suggests Bannon's entire life is under DOJ investigation, and has been for some time.
The DOJ appeared to be trying to wait to indict Bannon until Trump was out of office, to prevent a pardon. But when Bannon got on a yacht to conspire with a foreign national, it had to pick him up to stop the alleged crime in process. Then Trump pardoned him.
But the notion that the DOJ would have just given up on the overall Bannon case, because one charge was pardoned, is absurd. If anything the DOJ would be even more motivated by the pardon. Every inch of Bannon's life has surely been under DOJ criminal investigation.
It explains why the Bannon indictment for contempt feels like a chapter out of the middle of a book. When the 1/6 committee asked for the indictment, the DOJ had to pluck that out of the overall probe without prematurely revealing the entire criminal case that was being built.
So what is all this leading to? The DOJ does not want us to know, because then everyone in Trump world would know. DOJ loves catching people on perjury and then using it to flip them, which it can't do if everyone in Trump world knows what everyone else has said to the DOJ.
Bannon's court filing today is about playing the sympathy card with the far right, but also putting some secrets about the DOJ probe out there publicly so others in Trump world will know what's coming. But it's being done so weakly, it won't help anyone in Trump world.
Back when the 1/6 committee decided to target Bannon first, we said it was specifically because it knew Bannon would NOT cooperate, and it could make an example out of him by busting him for contempt, thus scaring more skittish witnesses into cooperating.
At the time we based this on major media reports about the Manhattan DA criminally investigating Bannon, meaning Bannon wouldn't want to risk further incriminating himself by cooperating with the committee. Now it appears Bannon was also under DOJ investigation at the time.
So Bannon REALLY had good reason not to cooperate with the 1/6 committee – which it was surely counting on. Since the Bannon showdown, numerous witnesses – from Pence's staff to Kayleigh McEnany have decided to cooperate, to avoid contempt charges. The strategy worked.
Keep in mind the DOJ has its own timetable, and does not care how impatient you're feeling. It doesn't panic when Bannon makes some laughably empty threat on a podcast. It only cares about building an airtight enough case to all but guarantee a conviction.
Bannon is not some genius strategist who's going to somehow magically defeat the DOJ because he made a court filing. Bannon is an overconfident clown who's ended up failing at, or getting ousted from, every project he's ever attempted.
So yeah, Bannon is (obviously) going down. As is much of Trump world. And these kinds of probes are ALWAYS based on busting the underlings to try to force one or more of them to flip on the biggest fish. If any one of Bannon, Rudy, Meadows, etc flips on Trump, Trump goes down.
And if you're yelling "but when?" then you missed the part about the DOJ not caring how impatient you are. We are not constantly 24 hours from total doom, no matter how often the pundits on MSNBC and Twitter insist we are. Indictments will happen when they happen. Who cares when?
As for those who keep insisting the DOJ only has until the midterms to complete its work: the midterms have zero bearing on who controls the DOJ. The pundits who claim otherwise are either clueless morons who know literally nothing, or intentionally misleading you for effect.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

Feb 6
Marc Short is fully cooperating with the 1/6 committee, but he’s also insisting his boss Mike Pence shouldn’t have to testify. Reminder: this is never about who’s “good” or “bad” or “grew a conscience” or “can be trusted.” It’s about whether these pieces of shit are useful to us.
Short was a piece of shit as Pence’s chief of staff. He’s still a piece of shit for taking 13 months to finally sell out Trump over 1/6. But Short has now become a USEFUL piece of shit, because he’d rather give up Trump than get indicted for contempt, and he hates Trump anyway.
Our side always wastes so much time debating whether someone like Short has “grown a conscience” or “can be trusted” or “should be forgiven.” But that’s gibberish talk. Those concepts do not exist on me way or the other with these kinds of folks.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 4
The RNC is condemning Liz Cheney. Mitt Romney is condemning the RNC. Republicans are in total disarray, and it’s costing them voters in the middle. Yet you don’t see any headlines about how this helps Democrats, only headlines that suggest the RNC meltdown means we’re all doomed.
[literally anything happens]

The media: “Democrats are in disarray, and we’re all doomed!”
Most of the headlines about the RNC’s censure vote today are about how “chilling” it is or the “danger” and the “damage” to our democracy (all the usual hype words).

That’s cute. But this is war. When the bad guys begin attacking each other, it’s always a win for the rest of us.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
The real question is who leaked to the media that Trump ordered Giuliani to look into seizing voting machines. In any story, the source is usually whoever looks good in that story. The story says Bill Barr refused Trump’s order, so Barr is probably the leak. This is important.
Barr has a consistent history of thinly veiled leaks to the media to make himself look good or to promote his point of view. IF this is the case again here, it means Barr wants his version of the story out there – which means he’ll certainly give it to the 1/6 committee.
The 1/6 committee chair says it’s already spoken with Barr. Didn’t say what about; or if it was actual testimony, or mere conversations about testifying. But if Barr did leak this, and the context of the NYT article suggests he is, it would surely mean he’s cooperating.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 1
At this point Donald Trump’s speeches increasingly resemble the videos that Bin Laden would periodically release after 9/11, in which he kept vowing to pull off bigger and bigger attacks, even as it became more obvious he couldn’t pull off any such thing.
9/11 was Bin Laden’s one big shot. It cost him his home base, his ability to freely communicate, and so on. 1/6 was Trump’s one big shot, and it cost him in roughly the same way. All Bin Laden had left after 9/11 was the ability to scare us just for kicks. Same as Trump now.
The parallels are remarkable – right down to Bin Laden’s visibly declining health in his post 9/11 videos, and Trump’s visibly declining health in his rare public appearances.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
The creeps waving the Nazi flags are trying to get under your skin. If your reaction is to fret, lament, and talk about how all hope is lost, you're giving them exactly what they want. If you want to stick it to them, drive voter turnout in 2022 and defeat their Republican Party.
If we're smart we'll spend this entire election cycle demanding that every Republican candidate take a position on these Nazis. Any position they take, it'll cost them votes somewhere on their side of the fence. It's how this game is played.
Any Republican candidate who denounces these Nazis will lose votes on the far right. Any Republican candidate who refuses to denounce the Nazis will lose votes in the middle. It's a no-won situation for them. But only if we use it, instead of sitting around whining about Garland.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 30
Everyone in the media knows Donald Trump has zero chance of being a viable candidate in 2024. Yet the entire media is conspiring with him to pretend he’s a lock for 2024. The media’s thirst for ratings has it conspiring with a traitor. That makes it a criminal conspiracy.
When Trump hints he'll run in 2024, the media has a RESPONSIBILITY to factually explain that he's just pretending he'll run so he can pocket the donations. Instead the media conspires with Trump to sell the lie that he's going to run.
When Trump says he'll pardon Capitol attackers, in an effort to convince them not to cooperate with federal investigators the media has a RESPONSIBILITY to point out no such pardons could ever happen. Instead the media conspires with Trump to pretend they'll be pardoned in 2025.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(