This isn't about "free speech". The government is not punishing Joe Rogan. Private citizens are deciding they no longer want to give their own money and content to Spotify while Joe Rogan fans apparently believe that he and Spotify are entitled to our money and artists' content.
Comedians should be able to say just about whatever they want without fear of being arrested or otherwise punished by the government.
But that doesn't mean Rogan or any other comedian is entitled to the platforms we use, the money we spend, or, least of all, our agreement.
Rogan's fans aren't angry because Rogan's "truth telling" is being attacked. They're angry because they're seriously under the belief that "free speech" somehow means Rogan is exempt from criticism and consequences (and by extension, his fans) just by virtue of having an opinion.
Because his fans have opinions, too. Many of those opinions are deliriously uninformed, at best, and I'm being incredibly charitable in that framing. Many of his fans have rightly been told their opinions suck by family and friends and colleagues, and it pisses them off.
Many of his fans truly see themselves as torch bearers for The Truth. Everyone else is a conformist sheep. Everyone else has bought into The Official Story™ out of fear and not because, you know, we recognize there are immutable facts impervious to wishes cast with nickels.
Many of his fans are like that guy in the old joke who's driving home after work and gets a call from his wife. She tells him to be careful because she heard on the radio there's a jerk driving the wrong way on the highway. He's like: "Honey, it's worse! There are hundreds!"
Yes, the government often sucks. Yes, much of the media can be irresponsible and divisive and sloppy. Yes, it can be frustrating to be reminded that we're all frail and imperfect human beings who make mistakes.
But that doesn't mean we get to "create" our own facts.
Regardless, Spotify can still keep Joe Rogan, and more than likely, they will. That's their prerogative. That is entirely out of our control.
And we can still choose where to spend our money and time and where to offer our artistry. That is not "oppression". That's agency.
If Joe Rogan's fans want to make Spotify the place where "feelings" reign supreme over facts, no one is stopping them. But telling everyone else that we are morally obligated to continue giving Spotify our money and content (because "free speech") is completely absurd. No thanks.
Now available in essay form on Charlotte's Web Thoughts, and yes, I would certainly love for you to subscribe. It's free.
I ended my Spotify subscription. It's a bummer, but there are too many other great music streaming apps out there to continue paying for this service without the guilt of where my money is going (and not going, e.g. artists). And I don't think I'll miss it. Easy decision.
It took me less than five minutes to cancel my Spotify subscription (via desktop) and sign-up for Apple Music, which has a 3-month free trial going. If you're looking for a way to put a bit of cash back in your personal budget for 3 months and listen to tunes, there you go.
There are many other options, and it's easy to switch from Spotify. Check out this helpful article from @joshgnosis:
Here's the fun bind that trans people are in when it comes to conversations about why people cared about Rogan spreading COVID disinfo enough to boycott but not enough about Rogan attacking trans rights to boycott:
If trans people speak out against Rogan, not really knowing if cis people are going to back us up, we risk being viciously harassed, and thus, we are challenged to wonder if speaking out risks more than it helps.
But if trans people don't speak out against Rogan and cis people claim not to have known about his extensive history of anti-trans propaganda, cis folks can say "well, hey, we didn't know. No one told us."
For about a year and a half, I worked at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum here in D.C. as a visitor services representative. On my first day, I was walking with my supervisor, who nudged me at one point and said: "See that guy? That's Henry. Make sure you talk to him." (thread)
Henry Greenbaum was born in Poland in 1928. His father passed away early in the war, his mother and two of his sisters were murdered at Treblinka, and three more of his sisters died in a nearby labor camp. Only Henry, his sister Dina, and brothers Zachary and David survived.
Henry survived that labor camp and then time at Auschwitz and then Flossenbürg and had he and his fellow Survivors not been liberated enroute on their death march, he would have likely been murdered at Dachau.
The D.A.R.E. program, as numerous studies have found, was abysmally ineffective. That's unsurprising to those of us who went through it as kids. It was very well funded window dressing for incompetent politicians who failed to understand root causes or didn't care about them.
In fact, some studies have shown that children who went through the D.A.R.E. program were more likely to use drugs than those who hadn't been in the program.
I don't pretend to know how "Euphoria" influences teens, but it's incredibly rich for a failed and harmful program that came out of a failed and harmful War on Drugs started by a failed and harmful presidency to lecture a TV show on what kids really need.
I've been feeling really bummed out lately about the world. You probably feel the same. So, aside from the bulk of Charlotte's Web Thoughts (my essays), I decided to launch a weekly newsletter component that focuses on good things happening in the world!
The newsletter component is called "The Goods", and I intend for it to be the kind of thing that makes readers smile every week and reminds them why we're fighting for a better world.
The stories featured in "The Goods" this week:
1. Amy Schneider's historic (and ongoing) winning streak on Jeopardy.
2. Rachel Balkovec's hiring as the first woman professional baseball team manager in the minor leagues.
3. Councilmember Andrea Jenkins makes history AGAIN.
I've worked numerous minimum wage jobs, and I've worked in salaried positions. I know for a fact the colleagues I had in "low skilled" positions could do office work. I'm rarely as certain that some salaried colleagues I've known would last more than a week in a minimum wage job.
It takes considerable skill to deal with asshole customers on a daily basis. It takes considerable skill to navigate work environments with mediocre HR policies. It takes considerable skill to juggle minimum wage labor when it's not even enough to live on most of the time.
And by the way: all this labor is needed to keep this country afloat. Many people who haven't worked minimum wage jobs forget that their standard of living would cease to exist without the millions and millions of low wage workers propping up the American economy.