Snyder also talks about how, in Orwell’s 1984, the fictionalized totalitarian government worked on reducing the number of words in the language.
Having each of us become repeaters of Internet Triggers accomplishes the same thing by reducing our ability to have complex thoughts.
Here's how I experience these Internet Triggers.
Leading up to the 2020 election, I knew that if I Tweeted ideas for how to turn out the vote, hoards of people tell me there was no point. They'd cite "elections experts" . . .
. . . who said it was super easy to flip votes. They then called me naive for believing that their votes would count.
Now I know that if I Tweet about the ongoing investigation, people will respond with "what is taking so long," or "Garland is corrupt and doing nothing."
This short thread on Internet Triggers dovetails with the blog post I did this weekend:
In other words, even if big shots start turning on each other, these people will still be fighting for control of local election boards and local school boards. sacbee.com/news/californi…
Extremists won't give up even if Trump goes down.
They need to LOSE elections at every level.
The extremists, backed by outside money, are working to take over county leadership including local boards.
They want to oust conservatives who are not "conservative" enough. . . meaning they are not reactionary coup-loving extremists. thenation.com/article/politi…
These extremists know that Trump planned and supported that coup and they love him anyway.
They know he supports white supremacists and they love him anyway.
I want Trump indicted, but I don't delude myself into thinking indicting Trump will "save" democracy.
Screenshot so I don't give airtime to people who trade on despair, even though it seems stingy of me to deny people such an easy route to popularity and attention.
Facts:
🔹Nobody knows what is happening inside the DOJ except people who work there.
1/
🔹People who speculate on what is happening based on evidence are, well, speculating.
🔹One problem is distinguishing fact from speculation.
🔹Here's the shocker: Just because someone is a well-known lawyer doesn't mean they are right when they speculate.
2/
🔹Another shocker: Not all lawyers are smart or good lawyers.
🔹It can be very difficult to distinguish legal facts from legal opinions. If you're a nonlawyer, this is harder than distinguishing facts or speculation.
Some things are legal facts. Others are legal opinions.
3/
Me: 768 indictments so far, including Steve Bannon and a recent indictment for seditious conspiracy. . .
in an investigation that is ongoing. . .
in less than a year, during a pandemic.
Person: NONE OF THOSE COUNT.
⤵️The Trump Org, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Allen Weisselberg, George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, George Nader, Michael Cohen, Lev Parnas. . .
Two impeachments.
The Mueller team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and 3 companies.
But none of those count, right?
Wrong about what?
I've said what has happened already.
I make no future predictions.
I doubt Trump wrote it, but the argument is "why do they need to pass a law against what we tried to do if what we tried to do was illegal?"
This is the attitude he has always had toward the law, and it's the attitude his father had.
1/
I'm not saying this will work as a defense.
As I said earlier, in the criminal context, most defenses fail (ask any criminal defense lawyer).
I'm saying that it's not an admission of guilt. It's a convoluted argument that what he wanted Pence to do wasn't illegal.
2/
In fact, the law that Democrats and a few others are trying to pass is to clarify the Electoral Count Act so people don't get the idea the vice president can win the election.
As I said earlier, Trump usually loses in court.
This is for the Court of Right-Wing Opinion.
3/